Free essays on justice provide insight into the legal, social, and ethical principles that govern the concept of justice. These essays explore the complexities of justice and examine various perspectives on the topic, offering analysis and critical evaluation of major issues such as human rights, social justice, and criminal justice systems. These essays may discuss various philosophical and theoretical approaches to justice, including distributive justice, retributive justice, and restorative justice. Overall, free essays on justice offer valuable information and perspective on this vital aspect of society.
The 8th Amendment Simplified: Protection Against Cruel and Unusual Punishment
The 8th Amendment to the United States Constitution is an important part of the Bill of Rights, meant to protect people from cruel and unusual punishment. This amendment, ratified in 1791, illustrates the Founding Fathers' dedication to ensuring that the government does not impose harsh or humiliating penalties on its people, regardless of offense. The 8th Amendment protects human dignity and is a monument to the values of justice and fairness. The phrasing of the Eighth Amendment is simple yet…...
Justice
Marbury v. Madison: A Landmark Case Shaping the Power of Judicial Review
One of the most significant turning moments in the history of the US Constitution is regarded to be the Marbury v. Madison case. The judicial branch's strength and authority were significantly impacted. The Supreme Court of the United States rendered this landmark judgment in 1803, which was crucial in establishing the concept of judicial review. According to this idea, the courts have the authority to interpret the Constitution and determine whether or not laws passed by Congress are legitimate. The…...
Justice
The Issues Surrounding the Use of Drones by the Military
In this essay it talks about how drones take a lot of hate due to all the bad things they can due and not the good. There are beliefs that this laws on drones are meant for the purpose of keeping people from spying or doing illegal things but it is obviously hard to enforce. Whats to stop people from spying on people or potentially harming innocent civilians in some way or form.Drones should be used for the good of…...
DronesJusticePolitics
Save time and effort. Get incredible results with the help of our writers.
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My
Paper
The Controversial Issue of Death Penalty
The death penalty has been around for over 150 years, killing criminals and even innocent beings. It is practiced in 31 states in the US, along with other countries. There are many different ways for capital punishment. For example, most places have done away with hanging people in public. The most popular way to go through with the death penalty is now lethal injection. Many believe that this is the least painful, and the least disturbing for the witnesses. Although…...
CrimeIs The Death Penalty EffectivePunishment
The Main Arguments in Favor of the Death Penalty
As a form of punishment, the death penalty is one of the oldest forms of punishments meted out against criminals guilty of grave crimes. In the modern world, many nations practise death penalty as the ultimate form of punishment for heinous crimes. Despite the widespread use of death penalty as a form of punishment, however, a critical look at death penalty shows that death penalty is not an effective form of punishment. This is because studies in social sciences have…...
CrimeIs The Death Penalty EffectivePunishment
A Debated about Whether Death Penalty of Juveniles Is Right or Not
In October 1989, a month after turning seventeen, Dwayne Wright went on a violent crime spree that lead to a robbery, attempted rape, and shooting of thirty-three year old Saba Tekle. When caught the next day, Dwayne confessed to the police and was tried in 1991. Before this crime, Dwayne grew up in a poor family and lived in a deprived neighborhood. He was exposed to criminal drug activities along with witnessing habitual gun violence and murder. At the age…...
CrimeIs The Death Penalty EffectivePunishment
The History of Death Penalty Dates Back to the Days of Hammurabi
Many people support the death penalty, and a lot of them use the defense that comes from the Bible: an eye for eye, and a limb for a limb. I on the other hand believe otherwise. Punishment by death, in my opinion, is 2500 prisoners are executed in at least 37 different countries, on an annual basis. There will be various statistics, opinions, history, and background information discussed throughout the residuum of this thesis. The history of the death penalty,…...
CriminologyIs The Death Penalty EffectivePunishment
The Unpredictability of the Death Penalty as a Crime Deterrent
Going into this paper I was very much in favor of the death penalty. Researching this subject has some what changed my mind. The first point that caught my attention was the cost of capital punishment, versus the cost of life imprisonment without the possibility of patrol. Also is the death penalty helping prevent or even lowering the number of homicides in this country? Also is the death penalty morally right, and what if we get the wrong person? Many…...
Is The Death Penalty EffectivePunishmentSocial Issues
The Theme A Jury Of Her Peers of Law in Triffles, a Play by Susan Glaspell
Trifles is a play that revolves around the law, Written by Susan Glaspell, a prominent leader of the American feminist movement, it highlights the gender biases within the law and the need for a fair jury in any case. A subsequent short story of Glaspell’s was published in 1917; it was based on Trifles and was appropriately entitled, A Jury of Her Peers. The term, “trifles”, has an important role in law, referenced to in the phrase, de minimis non…...
A Jury Of Her PeersGender EqualityJusticeSocial Issues
A Comparison of Geoffrey Chaucer’s the Miller’s Tale and the Wife of Bath’s Tale
In The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, Chaucer is both a pilgrim on the journey and the writer of the book. Chaucer’s point of view of society and humans in general is best illustrated through the similarities and differences between “The Wife of Bath’s Tale and The Miller’s Tale" where the treatment of women in the fourteenth century, the justice system in the fourteenth century, and the behavior and justification of that behavior by men emerge at every turn throughout…...
CrimeJusticeRapeWife Of Bath
A Summary of The Wolf of Wall Street, a Movie by Martin Scorsese
The Wolf of Wall Street (2013 film) is a film featuring the career story of Jordan Belfort, who start his career as a stockbroker in New York City in 1987. Jordan Belmont, an adult, the son of the two accountants who reside in Bayside, Queens. At the age of 22 years, he joined Wall Street as a broker and he had a wife Teresa Petrillo, the film show that Jordan Belfort was an employee of L.F Rothschild and work under…...
CrimeJusticeLawWall Street
The New Obstacle of the Occupy Wall Street Protest in Zuccotti Park
On October 13, 2011, an article by Anemona Hartocollis was published in the New York Times about a new obstacle of the then-month-long Occupy Wall Street protest. Having made arrests throughout the streets of New York on terms of “public safety Violations,” law enforcement officials have yet to intervene in the biggest protest zone of all: Zuccotti Park. Here protesters have set down camp and maintain a constant presence The park is privately owned by Brookfield Properties but open to…...
Human RightsJusticePoliticsWall Street
Freedom for Hester Prynne
As a Contemporary Magistrate, I understand the complexity of moral systems developing through time, but I believe that the values outlined in the United States Constitution and assessed by the Supreme Court are of utmost importance in as. ssing a government‘s ability to pass certain laws and determine punishments for the accused. In addition to assessing the constitutionality of law and penalty, the treatment of the accused should also be addressed under current moral standards of punishment and recent viewpoints…...
GovernmentHester PrynneJusticeLaw
Articles on Hate Speech Court Cases
This first article, about Hate Speech, summarizes a few different court cases in which the defendant was charged for Hate Speech. Because the first amendment protects all speech, most of the defendants got away with their words, but not all. There are cases in which the defendant produced true threats towards another, whether at the president or someone of another race. In these cases the defendant were charged, because the first amendment does not protect acts of violence I was…...
HateJusticeLawPolitics
An Argument in Favor of the Verdict in the Case of Brown vs. Board of Education
A Case of Emotional Impact The Brown vs. Board of Education case was a difficult task for Earl Warren, while he serve as a justice in the Supreme Coun, Earl Warren gives his account of what he went through to get the decision to pass unanimously and the pressure he dealt with. With, especially those who disagree with him, the decision involved segregation of blacks and whites in public schools, and the idea that "separate was not equal," The issue…...
Brown Vs Board Of EducationJusticeLawPolitics
Ethical Hacking and the Case of Jeremy Hammond
An ethical hacker is also regarded as a “white hat". is an individual or groups of individuals who has great knowledge of computer and general internet security. This person is usually employed by a company or organization to test security destruction internally. They find ways to break into the company ’s own system so that they can develop ways to stop anyone else from breaking into the organization's private information. In a sense the person is hacking their own company…...
CrimeEthical HackingJusticeTechnology
International Law’s Components & Their Impact on Relations
In the world today, there has been a new phenomenon of countries interdependence of one another due to globalization Nations rely on each other economically and politically, which creates a great need for International Law. International Law is a body of rules that binds states and other agents in world politics and is considered to have the status of law. International Law is essential to the peaceful interactions between nations due to the body of rules that binds states and…...
International LawJusticeLawPolitics
The Reasons Why States Follow International Law and Why Others Do Not
International law is a world system of rules and principles, involving similarity between sovereignty states and their subjects. However, international law differs from differ from state based legal Systems the writer of this essay believes that some states comply with international law because they want to whilst others do not to. The first following going to briefly describe international law and two offers the reasons why some states obey international law while others do not. International law consists of the…...
International LawJusticeLaw
An Analysis of Gender in the Juvenile Justice System
Juvenile delinquency is a legal term that describes the behavior of children and adolescents that would be considered criminal of adults. What people consider to be juveniles varies throughout the United States. In some places the maximum age for a juvenile is 14 while in others places it is 21. Juveniles between the ages of 16 and 20 have the highest rate of the most serious crimes. A high number of adult criminals have a juvenile delinquency record. The most…...
Juvenile Justice
Americals Juvenile Justice Dilemma by Brandon Lance
Juvenile Crime has been on the rise for some time now, and the legislature has yet to find an effective way to deal with the issue. This has been a problematiC ISSue for decades. somebody must step forward to defend our society against the violence of uncivilized juveniles. I am not suggesting that the offenders be put to death, but an effective plan must be put into action to stop the growing number of violent acts committed by minors. The…...
Juvenile Justice
A Critique of the Juvenile Justice Policy Reform
Juvenile Justice Policy Reform It is a disturbing fact that the number of delinquency cases handled by juvenile courts increased 43% between 1985 and 2000 (Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency Prevention, 2000). According to Snyder (2000), "Delinquency offences are acts committed by juveniles that would be crimes if committed by adults." (OJJDP, 2000). Here is the question to discuss. VWhat causes these youth to behave the way to get involved in the illegal acts, and who and how to deal…...
Juvenile Justice
A Discussion on the Role of Multiculturalism in Shaping the Canadian Identity
Multiculturalism had played an important role in defining Canadian identity. Canada's diverse population makeup displays how multiculturalism differentiates from the rest. Canadians are recognized worldwide for their diversity, and are perceived to be highly tolerant when it comes to multiculturalism and immigration. Most fail to recognize that Canada was fostered by immigrants from across the globe. Canada is not composed of any single nation but rather compiled of people from different nations and cultures. The purpose of multiculturalism is to…...
CultureHuman RightsJusticeMulticulturalism
Media’s Impact on Child Abuse Awareness
The media plays a significant role in creating awareness on child abuse. The way the media structures its reports on the vice creates awareness to the general public on the extent to which it is engrained in society. Significantly, the media has in the past been used to voice concerns over child welfare. Although there are other negative aspects associated with the press, it is also commended on its positive impact. The different articles on child abuse and neglect are…...
AbuseChild AbuseInjusticeJustice
The Connection Between Mass Shootings and Domestic Violence
One of the first articles I decided to look at is “Ms. Urgent Report: The Fight is Bigger than Kavanaugh” written by Amanda Hollis Brusky. Some of the main points in this article are: the Supreme Court is becoming strongly Republican with the appointment of Brett Kavanaugh, which is backed up by the history of additions to the Court like Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia; the lower federal courts are more important when it comes to laws and rights for…...
AggressionDomestic ViolenceJusticeViolence
Racism in Criminal Justice & Police Relations
I would like to address racism in the criminal justice system because to build a relationship between the police and the public you need a good foundation and that is far from what we have built. This stems back to the 1880's when Jim Crow laws was made legal, and even though the law was later abolished in 1964 we still have a huge problem with profiling and racism. Per Ghandnoosh and Higginbotham, "African Americans and Latinos constitute only 30%…...
Black Lives MatterJusticeSocial Issues
Character Analysis of Achilles Using the Philosophy of Plato
Many of the citizens, especially the younger men, always looked up to Achilles as a role model. They admired his courage and bravery on the battlefield and longed to be like him. Socrates seems to side with Achilles's admirers at first, however, things take a turn when he presents himself as the new model for righteousness and virtue. He addresses the nature and problems of justice, while pointing out the problems in Homeric poetry. Based on the claims he has…...
AchillesJusticeSocrates
“To Kill a Mockingbird” Atticus Stands For Justice
Andy Biersack once said, “stand up for what you believe in even if that means standing alone” (Goodreads). Often times in novels, characters go to extreme measures for something in which they take pride. In To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee, Atticus Finch, a lawyer, and father, stands up for his beliefs. Atticus believes everyone should be given a fair chance, no matter the situation. Despite the challenges Atticus faces, he still treats everyone equally. Atticus helps others because…...
EthicsFairnessPhilosophyTo Kill A Mockingbird
Achieving The Three Goals of Justice
While an increasing number of firms are scaling back on their use of performance evaluations, Facebook has decided to continue utilizing them. Their reason being that formally doing away with performance evaluations doesn’t stop the superiors from subconsciously assessing their subordinate’s performance and also deprives the employees of valuable feedback when they need it the most. Thus, Facebook is willing to make the necessary trade-offs to achieve the three goals of fairness, transparency and development associated with performance evaluations. Fairness…...
BusinessEmploymentFairnessPsychology
How Vouchers Support Liberty of Preference, but Shrinks Fairness of Education
This annotated bibliography brings to light ten scholarly sources on school voucher issues assessed comprise of a number of voucher systems, the significance of augmented parental supervisory and nonrvoucher method of educational choices. It also discusses how vouchers support liberty of preference but shrinks fairness of education, end product of a voucher stratagem on racial isolation, and the contribution of sectarian school in voucher agendas. The rise in the distribution of school vouchers has not necessarily been accorded to the…...
ChildEducationFairnessLearning
Fairness in Criminal Procedure
The suspected and charged individual is often disadvantaged as compared to the state in terms of available resources. Therefore the criminal procedure ought to ensure fairness and equality in its dealings. First the criminal procedures can be divided into stages and assigned to various bodies the investigating trying persecuting. deciding guilt. sentencing and execution of the sentences can be assigned to different independent bodies. This step is known as the separation of powers so as to avoid biases if only…...
CrimeCriminal LawFairnessLaw
An Overview of Fairness Doctrine
Fairness Doctrine as the name suggests is a system of the federal communication commission (FCC). The system was introduced in the year 1949 the reason for this policy was in order to convey conditions to the production and owner of the broadcast license to arrive. In a clear way the disputed issues, the policy obliged the holders to circulate in a fair and reliable way. It had its positive and negative effects the effects were noted during and after it…...
CommunicationFairnessLawPolitics
Frank Lucas in American Gangster by Ridley Scott
Andre Williamson At first when I chose my major in Criminal Justice I was really sure that I wanted to do it. This semester has really driven me closer to it the probation officer that I met has a lot to do with it and the movies that I have recently watched are getting me interested also. I just recently saw American gangster a documentary film about the notorious Frank Lucas. Throughout the entire movie, I was putting the evidence…...
American GangsterCrimeCriminal LawJustice
A Comparison of the Differences Between the United States and the Netherlands
Let us go for a visit to the Netherlands, home of never-ending beautiful canals, windmills, old wooden clogs, and most famously known for their cheeses. Most adults from the United States understand the punitive laws about “soft drugs” like marijuana and “hard drugs” like Cocaine, Heroin, and Opiates that the United States enforces. In the Netherlands, their views and laws about “soft drugs” and “hard drugs” are much different from the United States. Let’s head into one of their many…...
HealthJusticeLawThe Netherlands
The Torture of Negligence in Relation to Medical Malpractice
One of the most well known torts is negligence, specifically how it relates to medical malpractice, Medical malpractice is one area where tort reform is argued most heavily, Often time those in favor of tort reform argue that the fear of a malpractice suit prevents those in the medical field from performing theirjob at a high standard, whereas those in favour of tort reform argue that victims of medical malpractice should not be limited by what they can receive as…...
AbuseHealthJusticeMedical Malpractice
Socrates vs Hobbes
It is better to mention that Socrates is a philosopher and jurist that lived, while Thomas Hobbes lived between (1588-1679). Both jurist lived on the different era and time line and both of them are exposed to different kinds of legal system and philosophy It is justifiable to say that both of the jurists have different opinion of theories on their own on the aspect of the Law, how and why the law come into being. However, an analysis of…...
JusticeLawPoliticsSocrates
A Comparison Between the Works of Assata Shakur and Socrates
Assata Shakur and Socrates are both legends in their own aspectsiSocrates’ story comes from the past and Assata Shakur‘s life and incidences happened more recently. However, their stories are extremely similar to one another. They were both placed in predicament of being unfairly imprisoned Although for different reason. Shakur and Socrates also chose different ways to go about solving their problem Socrates chose to follow Athen‘s government decision of death instead of giving in to his supporters ideas to escape…...
EthicsJusticeLawSocrates
UK Copyright Private Use Exception Problem
Copyright is the array of legal rights which assign to creative works around the world, grants creators the exclusive ability to restrict their works and permits certain uses by others1. Nevertheless, these exclusive rights are not absolute yet restrained by exceptions and limitations to copyright law, which listed in the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (hereinafter CDPA 1988)2. The legislative intent aims to strike an appropriate balance between the legitimate interests of copyright owners and those desires of users…...
CopyrightCopyright LawJustice
Path To Forensics
Edmond Locard brought several contributions to modern criminalistics, but one of the most important ones is Locard's Exchange Principle. This principle states that anyone who comes into contact with the crime scene will bring something new to it and take something away from it. Locard's work and research in the areas of death, injury and criminal investigation lead to a form of legal medicine which involved many people such as physicians, statisticians, anthropologists, and mathematicians to contribute to police cases…...
Criminal JusticeCriminologyForensic ScienceScience
The Theme of Revenge in Cask of Amontillado by Edgar Allan Poe
In the Cask of Amontillado, Edgar Poe shows the cold reality that an offended man will go to, happily upholding his dark family tradition and motto. Montresor murdered his friend Fortunato for a family value; no man will cross a Montresor without being punished. This tradition is a foil to Montresor, showing what he will do if he wants to uphold his legacy. This is revealed in the text and through the actions of the characters. In the story there…...
EthicsJusticeRevenge
An Essay on the Censorship of the Internet in America
Censorship of the internet by the US government has been an important issue for the past several years. Each time a new bill is put before congress involving stricter internet censorship, it ends up being shot down, due to a massive public outcry against it However, internet censorship is a must. Just as there are laws in real life keeping people from committing murder, or possessing illegal firearms or substances, the internet requires certain measures to keep people from dealing…...
CensorshipInternetJusticePornography
We've found 435 essay examples
on Justice
24/7 Support