International law is a world system of rules and principles, involving similarity between sovereignty states and their subjects. However, international law differs from differ from state based legal Systems the writer of this essay believes that some states comply with international law because they want to whilst others do not to. The first following going to briefly describe international law and two offers the reasons why some states obey international law while others do not. International law consists of the rules and principles of general application dealing with the conduct of states and of international organizations in their international relations with individual’s privacy and minority group.
International law is governed by a state, this means that members of a state are not put under an obligation to accept international law, unless it has been given a permission to a particular conduct. There are two main branches of international law, which are private and public international law.
Public international law relates to the body of laws governing relationship between different states On the other hand, private international law which is also known as “conflict of laws”, provides a framework for argue resolutions between non- state actors and companies from different jurisdictions.
International law comes from for sources which are; international convention, international custom, general principle and judicial decisions. Some states comply with international law because they are interested to, they fear being isolated, disorder avoidance, punishment and identification with international norms. State obey international law because it is in their interests to do so, if a person agrees to follow international law, a person get certain benefits.
For instance, if the state want to be able to fly airplanes to other states, they need to conform to international safety standard and to obey air traffic control, Otherwise the other countries won’t let that particular state in.
States are interested in having a predictable legal order with another subject of international, States show a tendency to adhere to international law because there is a fear of disorder, this may happen through negative reciprocity. However international law is not enforceable if one do not obey it, they get punishments, that why states obey international law. International law does not lack effective machinery or authority to enforce it is rule, international court of justice has compulsory jurisdiction and sanction behind international law are very strong. Some states do not obey international law because international law is not implemented by a particular state, but it is only Romans law that is not prohibited Is that international law favours government over people.
Correspondingly, government support international law in part because their concerning is given more weight than that of citizens. In addition, sometimes international law contains provision that are in intension with each other. Weak justice system is another reason of international law disobeyed, to demonstrate people won’t obey the law if authorities of the state are corrupted. Other thing is that there is no overall authority to bind. International law lacks effective law making authorities, many rules of international law are uncertain and it has failed to maintain order and peace in the world. The evidence above shows that states has it is own reason of international law obedience while others do not obey international law because of negative rule the international law have, the essay offers the reason why some state obeys international law whilst others do not.