Moodle and Blackboard: A Comparison and Contrast Paper
This educator Is to propose the potential learning management system (ALMS) for the School District. After much pondering, this educator narrowed the ALMS choices to either Blackboard or Model. With the intent to identify, which ALMS system would best serve the needs of the faculty and students, this educator examined both options and reached a conclusion. This educator recommends Model be designated as the sole learning management system for the School District.
These recommendations are based on how fiscally responsible this decision to choose either Blackboard or Model. Background Learning Management Systems Is a software system that delivers coursework online. The School District already provides an optional website though Dweeb 2. 0 (Web 2. 0 platform) and AERIES (Student Information System). The Instance has arisen for the School District to collaboratively evaluate and adopt an updated ALMS software for the 21st century, with either Model or Blackboard.
Introduction Both Model and Blackboard offer standard ALMS functionality, integrated learning outcome, a mobile polling app, an ISO course app, language localization, and a plug- in video-recording option. Additionally, both Model and Blackboard offer free Administrative Support, but charge for Secure Socket Layer (yearly fee), Hosting Fee (yearly fee), and Mobile Set-up (one-time fee). However, Blackboard is a Commercial ALMS that does not offer global support, but offers an Android course app.
Blackboard charges course delivery, test Instance, and content/community fees. On the other hand, Model Is an open source ALMS with global support and free course delivery, test Instance, and content/community. However, Model charges one-time fees and does not have an Android course app. This provides data to make an informed session about whether the School District should purchase either Blackboard or Model as its new Learning Management System; the systems were compared and contrasted.
This comparison and contrast features cost effectiveness, ALMS functionality, app support, product support, and instances of use. ALMS Options: Blackboard and Model Educational processes within a technology-based environment are managed by Learning Management System software. “The purpose of the ALMS Is toward consolidation and providing a single, common Infrastructure to manage and track learning and development initiatives across the multiple organization yester that delivers coursework online. Both Blackboard and Model are learning management systems.
These Alms are extremely popular. “For e-learning programs to work, no matter whether they are produced in print, multi-media, or on-line, designers and developers must build a course with a strong foundation in these three pillars of e-learning [androgyny (how well adults learn), support (what help do they need) and logistics (how to reach learners with timely learning resources and support)]” (Swan 2012). Both Blackboard and Model Alms focus on androgyny, support, and logistics. Blackboard and Model: A Comparison (yearly fee), and Mobile Set-up (one-time fee).
The comparison matrix is shown below in Table 1 gives a clear view of the similarities between Model and Blackboard. Features Blackboard Model Standard ALMS Functionality Mobile Polling App ISO Course App Language Localization Plug-Len Video-Recording Secure Socket Layer (500$) Administrative Support (free) Hosting Fee Mobile Set-up Fees Both Model and Blackboard offer a standard ALMS functionality. A standard ALMS includes student enrollment in courses, restricted access, customization enabled, ability to upload files (e. G.
Word docs, Powering, audio files), linking to external web sites, allows zip course, and provides on CD to students (Learning Systems Support 2009). Additionally, a standard ALMS is SCORE compliant, has a discussion forum, has synchronous chat, has testing, has a drop box, has course calendar, has grades, allows for monitoring student participation, allow for copy course over from semester, and has customized template (Learning Systems Support 2009). Important features both of these Alms offers are integrated learning outcomes and language localization.
Integrated learning outcomes establish the foundation and direction for the program. In addition, language localization allows students to learn in their native language. Additionally, they offer optional plug-in video recording and mobile APS. Moreover, both of these Alms require similar security, hosting, and mobile fees. Finally, Model and Blackboard offer free administrative support. Blackboard is a Commercial ALMS that does not offer global support, but offers an Android course app. Blackboard charges course delivery, test instance, and content/ community fees.
On the other hand, Model is an open source ALMS with global purport and free course delivery, test instance, and content/community. However, Model charges one-time fees and does not have an Android course app. The contrast matrix is shown below in Table 2 gives a clear view of Blackboard and Model’s differences. Commercial ALMS Open Source ALMS Global Support Course Delivery Fee Test Instance (free) Content/Community Fee Android course app One-time fees Cheaper Overall Price Both Model and Blackboard represent two different types of Alms: open source and commercial.
Open source Alms are software available to the public and the code can be modified. Open Source Alms are flexible and customizable, with no license or hardware costs. Most can connect to both social media sites and mobile platforms. On the other hand, Commercial ALMS are software available to the public, but the code is not public. Commercial Alms are flexible and customizable, but have license and hardware costs. One important feature that Model offers is global support, which Blackboard lacks.
Global support means that that software and any technological issues are solved quickly. Additionally, Model offers free test instance, but Blackboard charges a fee. Test instances means how quickly the test is able to e accessed quickly. One important feature that Blackboard has is an Android course app, and Model does not have this app. Moreover, Blackboard and Model fees differ. Blackboard fees include a course delivery fee, a test instance fee, and content/ community which cost a school 34,600$ a year. However, Model requires one-time fees of 5,150$.
Key Considerations According to the CSS Channel Island’s Academic Technology Services (TATS) Dare to Compare: Blackboard 9 to Model: A Learning Management Systems Evaluation Annual Pricing: Secure Socket Layer (500$ a year), Administrative support (free), Testing Instance (free), and per-user price to host and deliver Meddlesome power 2011). Additionally, there are one time Fees: Flex page (3,400$), setup and configuration (1750$), mobile set-up (7,600$), Course conversion (175,000$), single Sign-on integration and Course integration (6,700$) (TATS 2011).
This study can be misleading because the school is converting courses from Blackboard, so otherwise it is 40,850$ (TATS 2011). Furthermore, according to the CSS Channel Island’s Academic Technology Services (TATS) Dare to Compare: Blackboard 9 to Model: A Learning Management Systems Evaluation Report, Blackboard costs for 400 students about 177,484$ for 2 years. Blackboard includes Annual Pricing: Administrative support (free), Course Delivery (11600$), Hosting (46,642$ ), Test Instance (13,000$), Secure Socket Layer(500$), Content/Community (10,000$ ), and mobile set-up (7,000$).
Recommendations This educator strongly recommends Model be designated as the sole learning management system for the School District. These recommendations are based on how fiscally responsible this decision to choose either Blackboard or Model. The overall cost of Model is more cost effective than Blackboard. Blackboard and Model cost different. Model costs upfront 23,450$ and 10,700$ a year on for 3,400 students, while Blackboard costs upfront 88,742$ and 88,742$ a year on for 3400 students. Upfront Model’s cost per student is about 6. 90$ upfront and 3. 5$ a year on, Blackboard costs per student is about 26. 10$ upfront and 26. 10$ a year on. Conclusions Blackboard includes a standard ALMS functionality, integrated learning outcome, a mobile polling app, an Android/Los course app, built-in video-recording (it’s a plug- in), and language localization. Blackboard does not offer both Android/Los grading app, and global support. On the other hand, Model offers standard ALMS nationality, integrated learning outcome, a mobile polling app, an ISO course app, language localization, built-in video-recording (it’s a plug-in), and global support.