Case study2 is about a professional incident in which an employee

Case study#2 is about a professional incident in which an employee whom was promoted to Head Office was new to his role and within a short time within his role he was advised to attend to the meeting which his boss Mr. Ketan could not attend as he was absent. Within this meeting of all Product Managers were called to attend. Satish which was the newly promoted employee was scrutinized by the VP, Mr. George whom Mr. Preet made clear at the introduction of this meeting he was new.

During this meeting, Satish was address by Mr. George which practically embarrassed him in the spot light and made a smart comment to insinuate that Mr. Satish was not current in his reporting’s. Needless to say, when the meeting was over MR George decided to meet with Satish about his behavior.

MGT- 438 Case Study 2

The following information will discuss the details of how the scenario could have or should of been handled and what is your personal opinions of you were in Satish position

Was it at all necessary for George to apologize to such a junior employee like Satish?

I certainly do believe it was necessary for George to apologize to Satish.

The act of an apology shows Satish that he is surrounded by a reasonable and intelligent man whom is not just solely concerned about the work being completed but a VP whom can accept when he is wrong and how sympathy and consideration that he was new to the position and did not have adequate time to prepare.

Get quality help now

KarrieWrites

Verified

Proficient in: Case Study

5 (339)

“ KarrieWrites did such a phenomenal job on this assignment! He completed it prior to its deadline and was thorough and informative. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

If you were in Satish’s place, how would you to respond to George’s apology?

If I was Satish, I would have responded the exact same speechless however if I was required to address my concern with the matter, I would have told Mr. George that I accept his apology. Then I would have proceeded to tell Mr. George that I look forward to working hard within this position and today would be the last day that I am unprepared for any and all future meeting because I am a dedicated and hardworking employees and I intend to super cede any expectations of me. I would close by stating that I take this promotion very seriously and thank you the opportunity and I look forward to making a difference.

Was George correct in saying that Satish is there to correct the “stupid mistake” of his boss and George?

George was very unprofessional for making such comments to Satish because as VP. This would indicate that he has encountered Keatn; Satish boss making mistakes prior and even send the message of Ketan incompetence to handle the position that he holds. In addition, it portrays that George may have a personal vendetta with Ketan because of how he chose to express that particular thought so loosely without considering the environment that he was in.

Would you employ George in your company?

I don’t believe it would be a questions of if I would employ George in my company. Because Georges’ position that he holds can be the result of his hard work and dedication and any sensible individual would be honored to have someone which such determination and knowledge to hold such a prestige position. So the answer to the question is yes. I would employ George at my company because of his work ethic and his commitment to what he does and I would ensure that he receives the proper training and leadership skills to manage individuals not in a senior positon like himself.

Did Preet make a mistake by not intervening during the meeting and correct George’s misconception about Satish?.

I honestly believe that Preet handled the situation with professionalism and poise. I certainly do believe that if Preet did interrupt Mr. George and correct him in front of the other Product Manager it would have been a display of disrespect and disregard for authority. As a result, sending a bad message to Satish and all other person present.

As an HR man, how would you define the character of George – bullying but later

regretting? Does his attitude need to be corrected? As an HR man, I would define the character of George to be focused solely on the product. Yes, I can agree that focus can bring about growth and development for the benefit of the company however George did not stop for a second and think before reacting. Causing Satish to be embarrassed and angered by his approach. I do commend George for recognizing his actions and seeking to make restitution quickly to avoid any workplace conflict arising and even displaying to Satish an image of leadership that is negative. I do not believe that George behavior was intentional to hurt or offend Satish but I certainly do agree that it was harsh. George character speaks of one who is focused on his duties and responsibilities.

Would you be happy to have George/Preet as your boss?

I would be happy to have Preet as my boss because he displayed professionalism at all cost even when he wanted to address the situation at the present moment. I admire the fact that he is a reasonable and logical man. He would make a great leader and an example of what managerial leadership should reflect and he would certainly receive more positive feedback from his colleagues and employees because of his tactfulness and professionalism. I would not disapprove of George as my boss because he did self-reflect and made an immediate attempt to right his wrong and that is not only commendable for a man but speaks volumes to his potential as a leader. I do agree that he may need more training when it concerns his communication, delivery and so forth but his drive is what will produce the results that the company need.

References

Flemming, Barbara. (2019). Case Study 2. Retrieved from