Myers-Briggs Personality Test

Abstract

Many of us have personalities that are quite unique. However, there may be some order to personality types. Jung (1923) suggested that humans may be alike in many ways but differ in perception and judgment. Thus, we may perceive different conclusions to situations. As a result, we may show differences in our reactions, values, needs and motivations (Jung, 1923; Jung 1998). This affects our worldview and how we make sense of our life and our relationships with others (Fischer, n.d.). Most importantly, our personality differences may influence us occupationally, suggesting it is important to consider personality types in the workplace (Kroeger, Thuesen, & Rutledge, 2002).

This paper will discuss my personality type from the Myers-Briggs Personality Test as it relates to Jung’s theory, our worldview lecture, and my occupation in the medical field.

Step 1

E-Extraverted

The first letter of my type is E for extraverted (Jung, 1998). My personality has always driven me towards caring for others. As a healthcare professional, I have made great use of the trait of extraversion.

I am very hands-on and patient-focused when working with staff, patients and colleagues. I love to connect with others. For instance, I like to build rapport prior to treating my patients. I call it “building a bridge.” When we form bridges, we can build a solid connection with others. For example, I may identify something within another person that interests me and have a discuss this before I consider treatment or therapy.

For example, I recently formed a solid connection with had a patient due to my extrovert-like nature.

Get quality help now

Prof. Finch

Verified

Proficient in: Behavior

4.7 (346)

“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

I entered the patient’s room and noticed they had a few books on the window ledge. I began asking him about what he likes to read, and what interests him about these particular books. Eventually, I was able to form a connection, or “build a bridge,” with him. This allowed him to feel more comfortable with me. I was then able to discuss treatment options for his chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). I feel that my source of energy is mainly in the external world, as I feel energized when connecting with others (Jung, 1998).

Furthermore, I take great pride in creating a pleasant atmosphere for my staff and colleagues. Being extraverted has always help me to succeed in creating a welcoming environment at work. The lecture, A Worldview Perspective on Organizational Behavior (Fischer, n.d.), reminded me that I see my life through the lens of being an extrovert. I notice that I constantly put effort into spending a small amount of time the morning talking and listening to my staff. This enables the staff to start off their day on a positive note. I feel satisfaction when others express themselves and feel heard. I believe that our ability to connect with one another originates from having conversations and listening others (Fischer, n.d.; Jung, 1998).

There are a few weaknesses associated with being an extravert, which include easily bored, trouble connecting with introverts at times, and disliking being alone. Although these are difficult to overcome at times, I compensated for these weaknesses by entering a helping profession. My job really helps me fuel my need to connect with others. I am confident that when I arrive at work, I will be able to talk and connect with others.

I- Intuitive

The second letter of my type is N for intuitive (Jung, 1998). I noticed that I have always had a keen sense of trust in my decisions. This was evident even during my military career. For example, I was in officer training school and my training officer said, “you seem to stay calm under fire and trust your intuition.” Although I had to make some choices that scared me, I persisted and stuck to them because I believed in my gut feeling.

The same would applies in my work in the medical field. For instance, placing an arterial line can be difficult if you are unsure that it is the correct location. If it is not the right location, it may not lead to the appropriate artery. Although I may not always have the right instruments or materials when performing this procedure, I typically rely on my intuition to guide me as I feel for the pulse. I may visualize the angle of the needle entering the patients arm as it reaches the artery. Although I have extensive training in this area, I have to trust my technique and my intuition for this procedure.

I tend to view the world with respect to my intuitive nature (Fischer, n.d.). The lecture suggested that our worldview incorporates an emotional framework for how we apply meaning to our life. This is evident for me; I tend to use my “gut feeling” and intuition to facilitate decision making and guide me in the right direction. However, a weakness of this type is that there is no concrete evidence to conclude a reasoning for my decisions at times. I may trust my intuition, but this is difficult to explain to someone else if they inquire about a decision.

T-Thinking

The third letter of my type is T for thinking (Jung, 1998). My mind is constantly active, and I tend to use logic to guide my decision making. Although I am intuitive by nature, I rarely make decisions based solely on emotion. I am always thinking of things I can do to better myself, family, lifestyle. I am always planning for the future and try to be as organized as possible.

An example of my thinking nature can be seen at work. We may be short-staffed, which can cause major detriments for patient-care and workplace flow.I have a tendency to proactively conspire ways of compensating for the gap in workforce. I have contracted agency workers that I can call upon at a short notice. I may look at the schedule for days that are likely to be short and recruit for help as a preventative action. I tend to problem solve and I focus on prevention and preparedness. This is another way in which I view the world (Fischer, n.d.). I believe that when we act from a logical point of view it creates a better atmosphere for everyone around us.

Conversely, there are weaknesses associated with a thinking nature. Sometimes I have difficulty interacting with those who make decisions purely based on emotion. It is hard for me to relate and sometimes I do not understand where they are coming from. However, being aware of my personality type is crucial so I am able to interact with those who have the Feeling (F) personality type.

J-Judging

Finally, the fourth letter of my type is J for judging (Jung, 1998). Judging refers to how we implement information from the outside world (Jung, 1998). As discussed earlier, I have a tendency to become very organized and act according to my original rules or plans. At work, I tend to analyze the work load to refine and customize it to accommodate the need of our patients and staff. I am a planner by nature and do not typically endorse spontaneity, especially at work or when interacting with patients.

For example, I can be a bit critical of my team’s performance at work. Our patient-provider bedside customer service survey reached an 83% rating. While 83% is adequate, I want to continue to grow as a team. We are constantly training and actively researching on how we can better address our patient’s needs. A score of 90-100% on our survey is probable; we simply have to do our best to reach our goal. This is the plan, but if someone had a different idea or did not want to stick to the plan of improving, I may have difficulty with this decision. This would be considered a weakness. Overall, these four types combine to create my personality type of ENTJ.

Summary of Personality Type: ENTJ

My personality type is an ENTJ (Myers, 1962). On an individual level, each letter applies to me appropriately. Taken as a group, the sum of the letters works together very nicely to form the ENTJ personality type. Overall, I tend to be organized, logical, and tend to plan ahead of time. I enjoy connecting with others and feel energized after having a conversation or discussion. I know what needs to be done and I execute on the plan. In other words, I am very decisive.

Additionally, my temperament type is NT, which is a rationalist. I have a propensity to value logic, knowledge, and make sense of the world around me. This is completely accurate. This personality type is especially complimentary for my career in the medical field. Patients look to providers who are stable and decisive when working.

Step 2

Personality may influence one’s role in an organization or have an impact on workplace flow (Kroeger et al., 2002). I have learned a lot about myself and my personality as it relates to my organization and workplace. Ultimately, these lessons and learning about my personality type with respect to organizational behavior will help me become a better employee. I learned that I tend to use logic and organization to make decisions.

Conclusion

I learned a lot about my personality type as it relates to my occupation in the medical field. Although most of us have unique personalities, these characteristics can be formed into certain types (Jung, 2913; Jung 1998). These personality types have an effect on us as individuals but can also affect our workplace performance (Kroeger et al., 2002). My type is ENTJ, suggesting that I am a planner, organizer, and enjoy sticking to the rules to help bring order to my life and the workplace (Myers, 1962). Knowing my personality type will help me become a better employee.

References

1. Fischer, K., PhD. (n.d.). A Worldview Perspective on Organizational Behavior. Lecture. Retrieved from: 1/index.html
2. Jung, C. G. (1923). On The Relation Of Analytical Psychology To Poetic Art 1. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 3(3), 213-231. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1923.tb00450.xJung, C. G. (1998). Jung Typology Test™.
3. Jung, C. G., & Briggs-Meyers, I. (1998-2017). Information About Personality Type.
4. Kinicki, A., & Fugate, M. (2018). Organizational behavior: A practical, problem-solving Approach (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Education.
5. Kroeger, O., Thuesen, J. M., & Rutledge, H. (2002). Type talk at work: How 16 personality types determine your success on the job. New York: Dell Pub.
6. Myers, I. B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual (1962). Palo Alto, CA, US: Consulting Psychologists Press.