A very popular debate in the world today is the effect of homework on students So, this raises the question, “is homework a good or bad thing? Is it positive or negative?” Homework is sent home with students on a daily basis. These students are already weighted down by extracurricular activities, social events, and events happening at their home Many children do not complete their homework, because they feel the weight of their obligations The older the children get the more homework they receive, and more is asked of them in everything drey do.
Life becomes more demanding with jobs, payments, sports, and more homeworkt Do children really need more homework, or is there something that could replace homework? The Flipped Classroom is the solution to the homework debate in the United States, but is it a good or bad thing? Does the flipped classroom really serve its purpose? More people say yes than no, but the arguments are astounding Despite the arguments, the ﬂipped classroom does serve its purpose, and it is effective if it is applied correctly.
The Flipped Classroom changes the normal teaching methods by integrating online lessons outside of the classroom and moving homework inside the classroom. So, basically, it is the opposite of a traditional classroom setting. The ﬂipped classroom uses many form of technology to teach and present the children with homework, “there is no doubt this is the future of education” (Gorman). The flipped classroom idea was created by Aaron Sams and Jonathan Bergmann in 2007, so it is a relatively new approach to teaching and learning.
They are two Chemistry teachers who stumbled on the idea because of the attendance rate in their Class. They decided recording their lectures and placing their notes online for the absent children would be beneficial. They also figured the other children could rewatch the lectures and review teacher notes, so the children would be able to relearn the material ii they must.
One of the major problems with the flipped classroom is the students ability to access the internet at home. No, not all children have computers or Wi-Fi at their home So this presents a major problem; is the flipped classroom a beneficial to all or does it give privileged children an advantage? Maybe those children should be provided with a computer or tablet from the school, so they have the same advantages other children do. Another major problem with the flipped classroom is the students actually watching the lectures. Will the students benefit more from actually watching the lecture, or will they benefit more from being taught in class? The students could be at a total loss during a quiz or test over information they had to watch, because they did not learn the information or watch the lecture. This approach requires the student to take responsibility and ownership for their learning. The teachers must trust that the students are doing what they are supposed to be doing, and if the students fail to do as they should it effects their grade while giving the teacher important feedback on individual Students.
The advantages of the flipped classroom range greatly One of the advantages is not all students learn at the same pace. Therefore, the students have the ability to pause, rewind, or fast-forward the lecture without the fear of their peers knowing they might not learn at the same pace as others. The students are free to spend as much time as they need studying the lecture. The students can also watch the lectures comfortably. They can lie in bed or eat while watching the lecture. Another advantage is, “it frees faculty to use their time with students in a learning environment more consistent with what we know about effective pedagogy: active students interacting with their instructor and fellow students rather than passive students sitting in a lecture hall” (Hill). The teacher has the ability to engage in a full classroom discussion, and they also have more time to answer questions the students might have about the material without having to complete a whole lesson. The classroom becomes more interactive while using this approach. “Faculty can then devote.
Lime to helping students develop synthesis and explore application during class time through: experiential exercises, team projects, problem sets, and activities that previously had been assigned as independent homework” (Hill). So, the teachers are able to be of more help to the students during class time. The students can have more hands-on activities in the classroom, and The lectures can be various amounts of time, but they are typically shorter than the actual class time. The flipped classroom also allows the teachers to learn about their students more easily. They are able to examine the different teaching styles mat certain students may find to be more successful. The flipped classroom has been tested in many school systems across the country. Overall the flipped classroom approach has a positive outcome. “Before the flip +50% of freshman failed English and 44% of freshman failed math, but after the ﬂip 19% of freshman failed English and 13% of freshman failed math”
That is just one of the many positive examples presented by the flipped classroom, but “To date, there’s no scientific research base to indicate exactly how well ﬂipped classrooms work. But some preliminary nonscientific data suggest that ﬂipping the classroom may produce benefits, in one survey of 453 teachers who ﬂipped their classrooms, 67 percent reported increased test scores” (Goodwin and Miller). The flipped classroom has been used for a short time, but it has made a major impact in most school systems who have attempted the ﬂipped classroom approach. A very interesting way of thinking toward the flipped classroom is, “What inverted classrooms may really be flipping is not just the classroom, but the entire paradigm of teachingiaway from a traditional model of teachers as imparters of knowledge and toward a model of teachers as coaches who carefully observe students, identify their learning needs, and guide them to higher levels of learning” (Goodwin and Miller).
This approach to the ﬂipped classroom sheds a light on society in a few ways The government creates new learning standards each school year. A major requirement now a days is the critical thinking aspect. By thinking more in depth and on a higher level, students can challenge themselves to solve questions they normally would not. A teacher acting as a coach is also not a bad idea. Coaches push their players to excel and be the absolute best they can be. Coaches make their players work hard to achieve goals and get better. So, if all teachers were more like coaches students would be pushed harder to do better in the classroom The students would get a better work ethic installed in them that would help them excel in life after all their schooling is completed.
Coaches also identify the student’s strengths and weaknesses, and come up with various methods to strengthen their weaknesses. A teacher acting more like a coach would help students out tremendously in the short-term and long-term. In conclusion, the flipped classroom is overall effective, but is still not a perfected approach; there are still many ﬂaws in the ﬂipped classroom. The ﬂipped classroom is used by many school systems across the country, and more systems try it out each year. The ﬂipped classroom is the educalion of the future for sure, but all the kinks need to he worked out before it can be considered the “official new education”. Some of the disadvantage of the flipped classroom can be worked out in the long run, and once that happens the flipped classroom will be a better approach to teaching in a classroom setting The advantages ourweigh the disadvantages of the ﬂipped classroom. Despite the arguments, the ﬂipped classroom does serve its purpose, and it is effective if it is applied correctly.