The Origins Of Community Care Social Work Essay

The beginnings of community attention day of the month back the Griffiths Report in 1988, peculiar Community Care: Agenda for Action and the authorities White Paper Caring for People. ( Guthrie ; 2011 ) The documents emphasised pick, independency and involvement service users and carers. A series of switching schemes and precedences developed such as ; move from institutionalisation to advance independent life within community, from service led to demands led proviso. ( Petch ; 2008 ) In 1990, the NHS and Community Care Act ( NHS & A ; CCA1990 ) was introduced that draws attending to the term “ attention in the community ” which for many service suppliers opened door to market of services, taking to denationalization and managerialism.

( Ferguson & A ; Woodward ; 2009 ) Although community attention was introduced by the NHS & A ; CCA1990, this operated in Scotland to amend the Social Work ( Scotland ) Act 1968 ( SW ( S ) A1968 ) . The add-on of subdivision S12 ( a ) into the SW ( S ) A1968 created a responsibility to measure the demands of the person who may necessitate services.

Potentially the statutory statute law that could be used in the instance of Mrs.

Sheerer are ; Mental Health ( Care and Treatment ) ( Scotland ) Act 2003, ( MH ( C & A ; T ) ( S ) A2003 ) , Adults with Incapacity Act 2000 ( AWI ( S ) A2000 ) , mentioned above SW ( S ) A1968 amended under subdivision 13 ( za ) and Adult Support and Protection ( Scotland ) Act 2007 ( ASP ( S ) A2007 ) . ( Mackay ; 2008 )

It seems to be really improbable to utilize MH ( C & A ; T ) ( S ) A2003 because there are no clear grounds that Mrs. Sheerer suffer a mental upset, defines as ; a mental unwellness, personality upset or acquisition disablement which is caused or manifested S328 ( 1 ) of MH ( C & A ; T ) ( S ) A2003.

Get quality help now

Writer Lyla

Verified

Proficient in: Human Rights

5 (876)

“ Have been using her for a while and please believe when I tell you, she never fail. Thanks Writer Lyla you are indeed awesome ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

She besides based on information provided, does non look to set herself or others on important hazard and her determination devising is non evidently impaired. It is deserving observing that the act is really controversial due to impact of stigma, coercion and breaching of human rights.

The AWI ( S ) A2000 could be used on the evidences that Mrs. Sheerer is deemed to miss capacity to do determination in relation to her hereafter attention demands, S1 ( 6 ) of AWI ( S ) A2000 states “ incapable means incapable of doing determination ” and this seems to be relevant to the instance. It is of import to observe based on statute law that if Mrs. Sheerer is unable to do determination in some countries, she is likely to take determinations in others. In Scots jurisprudence, there must be clear grounds that a individual deficiency of capacity before any action will be permitted. ( Scots Government ; 2008 ) However, in England and Wales the same regulation is statutory, the grownup must be assumed to hold capacity unless proven otherwise as stated in S1 of Mental Capacity Act 2005 ( MCA2005 ) . It may be questioned if Mrs. Sheerer really deficiency of capacity, based on individual SMART trial in hospital status. Hospital could worsen confusion, as a consequence of strangeness, deficiency of slumber, medicine or hurting. When step ining in Mrs. Sheerer live, the rules defines in S1 of AWI ( S ) A2000 must be taken into history such as ; intercession will profit the grownup and will be least restrictive option in relation to the freedom of Mrs Sheerer. Account shall be taken of the present and past wants and feeling of service user and the positions of other relevant people. It is deserving observing that rule three merely requires positions are taken into history but it does non intend they are given consequence to. The principle four of the AWI ( S ) A2000, to advance the engagement in determination devising, is somewhat different in England and Wales, where determinations being taken in the best involvement of and grownups harmonizing to S1 ( 5 ) of MCA2005. It is of import to look into if Mrs. Sheerer did non take advantage of the options such as ; negotiorum gestio, which allow the authorized individual to move on the behalf of an incapable grownup, lawyers or defenders to take determination on behalf of an grownup. An lawyer is appointed by the individual before doomed of capacity, at the presence of the canvasser whereas, a defender is appointed by the sheriff tribunal. ( Guthrie ; 2011 ) Application for a care order when Mrs. Sheerer is in hospital ready to dispatch, could do unneeded procedure known as delayed discharge codification 51X. ( Scots Government, 2010 ) The holds in care order could be caused, by troubles in obtaining legal assistance by relations. If societal worker felt the hold in discharge consequence in negative effects for Mrs. Sheerer, it would be considered taking over the guardianship application. To use a guardian Mrs. Sheerer harmonizing to S57 of AWI ( S ) A2000 must be incapable and it must be likely that incapacity will go on. Therefore, the application for the defender could be irrelevant in a state of affairs of Mrs. Sheerer because there are no groundss of continuity of incapacity and the current province can merely be impermanent. If Mrs. Sheerer was non able to do determination, merely for a short period of clip, sing her public assistance or finance, where determination had to be made rapidly, a societal worker of behalf of local authorization has responsibility to use for an intercession order under S53 of AWI ( S ) A2000. Potentially AWI ( S ) A2000 could be used to imposed attention at place or residential attention to Mrs. Sheerer.

Assuming that Mrs. Sheerer does non hold appointees and deficiency of capacity to do determination about future attention demands, it would has to be considered if the application for an order under the AWI ( S ) A2000 is necessary or instead use the power of the SW ( S ) A1968 amended under subdivision 13 ( za ) . This subdivision, give societal worker a power to supply community attention services that has been assessed as needed to Mrs. Sheerer due to incapableness to accept having such services. In conformity with S13 ( za ) of SW ( S ) A1968 Mrs. Sheerer could be move to care place or hold with proposed attention intercession. Before utilizing any of those two Acts of the Apostless, the issues to discourse are ; acceptance of rules, want of autonomy, appraisal of demands and hazard every bit good as fiscal agreements.

The last but non least legal option to see is ASP ( S ) A2007, the act refers to the jurisprudence that concerns non lone protection but supplying support to advance independency and public assistance of service user. Mrs. Sheerer meets two status of the act to be applied such as ; she is at hazard and may necessitate protection of wellbeing, due to her deficiency of capacity, hapless nutrition every bit good as hazard of falls. The ASP ( S ) A2007 gives societal worker working on behalf of local authorization responsibility to look into and measure Mrs. Sheerer. Most of appraisals are undertaken on a voluntary footing but the act gives power to measure without consent of service user and is known as the first of three “ protection orders. ” ( Mackay: 2008a ) The act besides established a responsibility to collaborate between bureaus and creates multi-disciplinary Adults Protection Committees to implement, proctor and back up the work.

One could imagine that the usage of ASP ( S ) A2007 seems to be the most appropriate option because is the less restrictive harmonizing to Mackay ( 2008 ) pyramid of statutory intercession. What is more, the act itself does non stigmatize, the least breach human right or freedom. It will give societal worker clip to acquire know and construct better relationship with Mrs. Sheers. Consequently, it will ensue in holding more information and better image of state of affairs. When utilizing ASP ( S ) A2007 one assume Mrs. Sheerer ‘s state of affairs could be caused by sing some troubles in her life or even suffer hurt such as mourning, lost or maltreatment. The intercession in Mrs. Sheerer live will depend on many factors to be discussed ; service user ‘s sentiment, adaptability of house to current demands, the status of house and handiness, sentiments of other professional and relations. One might anticipate that Mrs Sheerer, irrespective of age but due to femur break will necessitate intense place attention services or version of the house such as ; raised lavatory place, grab or lifting grips, community dismay, infirmary bed or others. The application of the above will be possible under S13 ( za ) of SW ( S ) 1968 imagining that Mrs. Sheerer expresses consent to such services to be provided. Social worker has responsibility to measure the demands of Mrs. Sheerer under ASP ( S ) 2007 but the consent to supply services is needed to utilize S13 ( za ) of SW ( S ) A1968. Otherwise, societal worker could take action under AWIA ( S ) 2000. The rules of these Acts of the Apostless required to take the position of Mrs. Sheerer and carers if involved, into history when make up one’s minding what services to supply, this is besides in conformity with Community Care and Health ( Scotland ) Act 2002 ( CC & A ; H ( S ) A2002 ) amended under S12 ( a ) of the SW ( S ) A1968. It is deserving indicating out that Mrs. Sheerer was nutritionally compromise but had home attention services and limited household intercession. This raises the inquiries of why it was non noticed, how adequate is the consequence of SMART trial in infirmary conditions and how this had affected Mrs. Sheerer. There are a batch of guesss and factors to see but taking into history the limited information that were given and presuming societal worker investigates this instance for the first clip, it seems be discriminatory to utilize other statute law. One must retrieve that legislative context of intercession, chiefly, is driven by the relationship between societal worker and service user, which is a nucleus component to success intercession in societal work. It is an of import beginning of information to understand the world behind the state of affairs and how best to assist. Wilson et Al. ( 2008: p.7 ) mentioning to relationship-based pattern called it “ the medium ” through which societal worker can prosecute with and step in in the complexness of internal and external universe of service user.

This portion of the essay examines duties, rights and function of people involved. The statute law gives the societal worker moving on behalf of local authorization a general duty to advance good being, to understate the consequence of intercession and give an grownup the chance to take as normal live as possible. Local authorization is responsible for measuring demands for community attention services, set uping and supplying these services every bit good as cooperation with other professionals such as ; occupational healer, lodging officers, GPs. This is harmonizing to the integrating docket between wellness and societal attention services. ( Age Scotland, 2011 )

Social worker has statutory responsibilities underpinned non merely by the jurisprudence but besides professional codifications and values. Expectation of societal work profession is presented in codification of moralss issued by British Association of Social Workers ( BASW ) and codification of pattern represented by Scots Social Services Council ( SSSC ) . Social work values grew on the thought of regard for the equality, worth and self-respect of all people. Human rights and societal justness are at the bosom of societal work intercession. The five rules indicates by BASW ( 2012 ) sing human rights are ; to advance and esteem good being, support people to do ain picks and determinations, promote engagement, engagement and authorization of people utilizing services, handling each individual as a whole to recognize all facets of service user ‘s life, placing and developing strengths. While, codification of pattern ( SSSC ; 2007 ) requires ; to protect the right and advance the involvement of service user, maintain the trust and assurance, promote independency while protecting from injury and danger, respect the rights of service user.

The Scots Parliament and public governments are required to continue the European Convention of Human Rights, incorporated into the UK jurisprudence through Human Rights Act 1998. ( Johns ; 2008 ) It can be in some instances that the jurisprudence can transgress human rights. Therefore, in relation to Mrs. Sheerer societal worker most of all has to esteem, Mrs. Sheerer ‘s right to liberty and security, the article five established three conditions to be met before it will be breached such as certified mental upset within important grade and doggedness. Article eight provinces that Mrs. Sheerer has the right to privateness, household life, place and correspondence. ( Johns, 2008 ) She besides has the right to entree a canvasser or protagonism included under S6 of ASP ( S ) A2007.

The function of societal worker will be to guarantee Mrs. Sheerer understand legal procedures and if she is cognizant of her rights. The statute law model is complex, accordingly ; information given must do sense and be apprehensible for service user, the function of societal worker is to take clip to explicate and reply inquiries. Social worker must utilize appropriate and effectual method of communicating and accomplishments to understand and to be understood. The purpose is to back up Mrs. Sheerer to do informed picks every bit far as possible. Social worker must guarantee that Mrs. Sheerer ‘s positions are heard and she understands a state of affairs. There are six core functions of societal worker such as ; instance worker, advocator, spouse, assessor of hazard and demands, attention trough, agent of societal control. The above functions are affected by alterations in wider societal context, public assistance policy and political orientation like for illustration demographic alterations, communications engineerings, consumerism etc. ( Scots Government ; 2005 ) Social worker function is to work together with Mrs. Sheerer to help her to turn to personal issues, supply information and protagonism. Supply services to run into the demands of service user and non to seek to repair Mrs. Sheerer to services available.

This portion of the essay efforts to demo the chances of anti-discrimination, engagement and authorization in societal work. Social worker is obligated by jurisprudence, values and moralss to back up and work with service user in anti-oppressive and anti-discriminatory manner. Knowledge and apprehension of professional codifications such as ; BASW and SSSC is important in being cognizant of anti-discriminatory pattern in societal work by specifying rights and duties. The anti-discriminatory tendencies in societal work values and pattern are profoundly rooted in extremist societal work that aims to work towards a society based on equality, justness and engagement. Harmonizing to the axiom popularised by Marx “ from each harmonizing to his ability, to each harmonizing to his demands. ” ( Doel ; 2012, p. 27 ) Social justness is still a basic value in societal work pattern. Dalrymple and Burke ( 2006 ) refer to emancipator issues that driven modern-day societal work such as societal justness, authorization, partnership and minimum intercession. Participation is a cardinal component in the development of anti-discriminatory pattern. Wilson ( 2008 ) refers to engagement of service user in societal work pattern based on partnership and authorization. The term partnership is used to mention to pattern, based on working with service users, towards together agreed ends, instead than making things for them. ( Thomson, 2011 ) Dalrymple and Burke ( 2006 ) defined partnership as procedure of information sharing and engagement in decision-making. Taking the above into history societal worker have to affect Mrs. Sheerer in the procedure of determination devising and intercession such as specifying demands, make up one’s mind how best to assist, implementing, holding and measuring. Authorization is non merely a affair of easing or enabling. It besides involves taking history of the disadvantage and subjugation that are so characteristic of the service user twenty-four hours to twenty-four hours experiences. ( Thompson, 2008 ) Work in anti-discriminatory manner means to see Mrs. Sheerer within her broad societal context include environmental, social and cultural factors such as race, gender, ethnicity, age, sexual orientation, disablement and so on.

The last subdivision of the essay assesses societal policy that inform legislative context of this instance. It is seems to be clear that societal worker demands to work in integrating with other professionals within all facets of appraisal and intercession procedure. The statute law defines duties in societal work but societal policies outline a program of action, a set of regulations that guide pattern.

The first important policy in footings of advancing partnership working across wellness, lodging and societal attention is Joint Future 2000. This is a alone partnership between the Scottish Executive, the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities ( CoSLA ) and NHS Scotland that focus on to better joint working through funding articulation services, direction and resources. A cardinal constituent of Joint Future has been development of Single Shared Assessment ( SSA ) that aims to shorten and better flow of information between professionals and bureaus, avoid duplicate, provide faster entree to back up with less bureaucratism. ( Age Scotland, 2012 )

The policy Changing Lifes 2006 has concerned on anti-discrimination, to make non look at service user in the context of exposure but to concentrate on strength and edifice true relationship. The purpose set out through study were advancing engagement ; taking a whole-person attack ; understanding each person in the context of household and community. ( Scots Government ; 2006 )

The another policy that seems to be of import in relation to scenario, with the premise of that Mrs Sheerer is an older individual because the policy aims chiefly to older people, is All our Future. It supports older people to remain at place every bit long as possible by supplying free personal attention, telecare development programme, attention and fix, travel strategy ; free coach travel etc.. ( Scots Executive ; 2007 ) It is notable that Mrs. Sheerer may be entitled to liberate personal attention that was introduced by the Sutherland study and statutory implemented through the CC & A ; H ( S ) A2002. ( Guthrie ; 2011 ) In Scotland every individual over 60 old ages is entitled to liberate personal attention in other instances it will depend on demands, precedence and classs of hazard. The policy Reshaping Care for Older Peoples ( SCSWIS ; 2011 ) focuses on the “ 3R ‘s ” rehabilitation, re-ablement and recovery to optimize the independency of people at place. The reablement is a new service, ab initio aims at people coming out of infirmary. In Glasgow it is a partnership between Social Work Services, Cordia, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. If Mrs. Sheerer lives in the country, she will be provided with services up to six hebdomads, the reablement aims to construct assurance by assisting to recover the accomplishments to make what Mrs. Sheerer can and desire to make for herself at place. ( Glasgow City Council: 2011 )

Recent audience on integrating docket, set out proposal to inform and alter the manner that the NHS and Local Authorities work together and in partnership with the 3rd and independent sectors. This includes incorporate budget and joint answerability. The proposal extends the services proviso to all grownups and non merely older people, so the guesss sing the age of Mrs. Sheerer would non be needed. The Integration of Adult Health and Social Care Bill will convey forward statute law to make Health and Social Care Partnerships, which will replace Community Health Partnerships and will be the joint and equal duty of Health Boards and Local Authorities. ( Scots Government ; 2012 ) Ineffective partnership between wellness and societal services is a existent quandary of modern-day societal work pattern. On the one manus, the job is finance and the ageless inquiry ; who are traveling to pay for services? On the other, the issue of happening appropriate resources that will run into the demands of Mrs. Sheerer, both procedures are clip devouring. Consequently, Mrs. Sheerer can be detained in infirmary thirster that necessary that can impact her emotional and physical status, which normally will deteriorate. Other issues are ; blocked bed and retained the flow of a new patient. One strongly believe that new integrating docket of wellness and societal attention such as one budget and amalgamate partnership will do a difference in new societal services. The new societal policies and statute law present a broad scope of possible options and picks such as ; personalised services and autonomous support. It this hebdomad authorities has been discoursing the Social Care ( Autonomous Support ) ( Scotland ) Bill ( SDS Bill ) that has been passed phase three on 28th of November 2012. ( Scots Parliament, 2012 ) What that means for societal work today is a displacement from service led to outcome led proviso, The Talking Points: Personal Outcomes Approach promoted by the Joint Improvement Team will alter the procedure of appraisal of demands that now will be more focal point on marks. Based on SDS Bill societal worker will hold a responsibility to offer ; direct payment to Mrs. Sheerer in order that she will set up her support ; can do agreement for services that have been chosen by Mrs. Sheerer or can choose appropriate support and do agreement. ( IRISS ; 2012 ) One could earnestly oppugn if Mrs. Sheerer will hold accomplishments and cognition to pull off these assortment of options such as ; possibility to use ain carers or purchase ain services, if she have non done earlier. It seems to be clear that the function of societal worker will hold alteration signifier procedural attention direction towards support and securities firm.

To sum up, modern-day societal work pattern floating off from paternalism to seeing service users as experts of ain life an illustration of this is work in partnerships, service user engagement or SDS. There is no uncertainty that relationship between societal worker and Mrs. Sheer is a key in the procedure of intercession. It is important to speak to and listen to serve user. The more clip spend, the more societal worker will understand Mrs. Sheerer within wider societal context. One must retrieve that when step ining in person ‘s life taking no action is an action, otherwise the option of minimum intercession or less restrictive option must be put in topographic point.