Ethnographic Research Paper: Latino-American Immigration Experience Essay

The in-migration experience as a Latino-American is every bit diverse as the manifold cultures that the pan-ethnic individuality. Latino. purposes to subsume. With respects to the in-migration experience. Zavella ( 1991 ) lays an accent on the impression of societal location. The difference among Latinos in American society is embedded in their “social location within the societal structure” . in which individuality. or one’s sense of ego. is emergent from the intersected societal infinites formed by category. race/ethnicity. gender. and civilization.

In order to derive a sufficient apprehension of the individuality of the Latino-American immigrant.

it is necessary to see the subjective conditions under which single experiences have shaped behaviours and attitudes. Through analyzing societal location. this essay aims to uncover the significance that an single in-migration experience has had in determining a sense of ego in relation to American civilization.

In this essay. I discuss his in-migration procedure in visible radiation of subjects such as Latino individuality. assimilation. legal position. immigrant societal web in response context.

and household duties to show how Mr. Raya’s personal experiences have constructed his individuality as a proud American. In peculiar. I will see how these subjects contribute to his relation to the Latino community. how an active attempt to larn English and familiarise with legal boundaries constituted a sense of belonging. perspective functions in U. S. society. and the influence of household values on his behaviour. Latino Identity Suarez-Orozco. Marcelo and Paez ( 2002 ) explicate how the Spanish linguistic communication acts as the consolidative agent across Latinos in American society.

Get quality help now

WriterBelle

Verified

Proficient in: Ethics

4.7 (657)

“ Really polite, and a great writer! Task done as described and better, responded to all my questions promptly too! ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

The Latino population is made up of those whom originate. or are posterities from. a huge array of Latin-american states that ranges from Mexico. reaches oversea to the Caribbean Islands. and down through Central to South America. The cultural difference among immigrants and the manner in which American society receives them contributes to their societal location and differs greatly between persons of the Latino community. The cultural class of Latino is one in which the United States has adopted in an effort to racially specify a peculiar religious order of society.

The Latino individuality has been crafted by the U. S. overnment and additions its intending entirely in relation to the experience in U. S. society. Although Latinos are frequently misrepresented by their pan-ethnic rubric. “the Spanish linguistic communication generates a powerful gravitative field conveying them together. ” The assimilation experience as a Latino immigrant may be divided mostly by structural forces associated with cultural beginnings. nevertheless. the Latino individuality stands united under the Spanish linguistic communication. Originally from South America. Mr. Raya is a proud Peruvian who associates himself with others from Latin American backgrounds due to their common cultural usage of the Spanish linguistic communication.

Mr. Raya elucidates. “I want to get down by clear uping what the term Latinos means. So Spanish comes from Latin…so our roots are from Latin. That’s why our linguistic communication is latino. The linguistic communication. Not our race. Because I’m from South America. Rigo for case is from Mexico. but if you see us together so you can name us Latinos. Because it is the general thought. ” ( p. 1. l. 1-4 ) . Mr. Raya clearly states that his connexion to other Latinos. such as his colleague Rigo. is entirely due to their usage of the Latin-base linguistic communication. Spanish. Similar to the experience expressed in the literature. Mr.

Raya’s individuality as a Latino is merely in relation to his association with other Latinos life in America. Assimilation Chavez ( 2008 ) demonstrates how the assimilation procedure of Latinos migrating to the U. S. has been compromised and restricted due to the “Latino Threat Narrative” . He argues that the popularly held thought that the Latino presence in the U. S. challenges American ideals and society on the whole histories for the scrawny rates of assimilation among Latinos in America. Latinos are viewed as a menace because of a sensed “refusal” to absorb into the larger society due to the desire to continue their ain civilization.

One manner in which Latino immigrants are considered as resistant to American society is by their usage of the Spanish linguistic communication instead than what is preferred by the U. S. bulk. English ( Cornelius. 2002 ) . American disapproval of Latino in-migration has been expressed through the execution of in-migration Torahs. followed with a negative representation of Latino in-migration in the mass media. America’s defensive attitude toward Latinos have stigmatized them with being “illegal” . which in bend. alienates Hispanic immigrants due to racialization effects from unwelcoming attitudes held by the larger society Gomez. 2007 ; Martinez. 1998 ) . When first traveling to America. Mr. Raya barely knew a word in English. His initial battle to integrate into the U. S. societal order was on history his deficiency cognition of the English linguistic communication.

His capacity for effectual communicating was bound to the confines of the Spanish linguistic communication. He portions his experience. “I felt entirely. I couldn’t. good I say: Good Morning. How are you ; that was it you know. Even if person talked to me you know I was like a clam you know. I couldn’t. I didn’t. I didn’t want it. those things you know” ( p. 1. l. 3-25 ) . Mr. Raya’s experience stresses the separation from the American community felt by the Latino immigrants described in the Chavez survey. He explains how a shortage of the English linguistic communication contributed to a feeling of solitariness. In contrast to the literature nevertheless. instead than forcing him further off from his assimilation end. Mr. Raya became attracted to larning English. He explains. “So that’s why I went to school. I started analyzing English. and so I felt. I got Americanized instantly. ” ( p. 1. l. 29-30 ) .

Discontentment with his stray province. Mr. Raya recognized the importance of talking English. He credits larning English for his ability to absorb and how it lead to a gained sense of belonging as an American. Legal Status Abrego ( 2011 ) calls attending to the function that an immigrants’ legal consciousness dramas in the incorporation procedure. Research suggests that grownup immigrants with an undocumented legal position frequently live in a changeless province of fright due to menace of exile. The internalisation of the “illegal” stigma criminalizes undocumented immigrants and legitimizes the development of migratory workers ( Menjivar and Abrego. 2012 ) .

Their submissive attitude and inactive life style under subjugation is reinforced through the U. S. construction and finally prevents their accomplishment of assimilation. On the other manus. those considered as being “with the law” . that is. those with a strong legal consciousness. “are aware of their rights and are likely to do claims for damages or inclusion” . Immigrants aware of their legal rights under American statute law are shown to hold more successful rates of incorporation. Mr. Raya’s experience with using for U. S. itizenship portrays him as holding a strong legal consciousness. Although he is non an American citizen on paper. his consciousness of his contractual understanding made with the United States authorities provides him with the information to endorse up his assurance that secures his sense of belonging. Mr. Raya recalls his experience. “ When I went to use. when I went to use here. they told me. ‘you merely subscribe a paper. stating that you’re traveling back at that place. ’ After 2 to 3 old ages. I had to travel back at that place. But my societal security. I have a driver’s licence ; I’m legal here.

But if I go out. I can’t come back in 10 old ages. That’s one of the grounds why I ne’er went out. I ne’er went back at that place. back to Peru. ” ( p. 3. l. 1-5 ) . In line with the statement provided by Abrego ( 2011 ) . Mr. Raya’s legal consciousness of what he can or can non make under administrative edict. constitutes his sense of belongingness in American society. Mr. Raya farther explains. “I truly feel like America is my state. I miss Peru of class. but I’m okay. I’m merely like an American right now. So I play the regulations and everything” ( p. 2. 1. 16-18 ) .

He asserts his entitled right to populate in America. and affirms his entitlement through proper signifiers of designation. Because he is cognizant of his legal standing. he cautions himself of the repercussive effects of go forthing the state. He makes witting determinations based of the cognition that if he were to return to Peru. he would non be permitted back into the U. S. instantly. Knowing what is and isn’t available to him under the U. S. legal system has given Mr. Raya his assurance due to the liberty and control he has over his destiny.

Social Networks Menjivar ( 2000 ) argues against the “overly romanticized impressions of immigrant unity” that surround the image of Latino immigrant societal webs. Research analyzing Salvadorian immigrant societal webs provides grounds that refutes the stereotyped premise that latino household members already populating in the U. S. to offer unconditioned fiscal. emotional and material support for their migrating relations. The presence of bing societal webs with persons populating in the U. S. serves for an inducement and resource assistance for migration.

However. the manner in which societal ties receive friends and household upon passage is affected by context. In American society. perceptual experiences held among immigration societal webs have shown to reflect U. S. structural characteristics such as the labour market instead than the cultural norms of the societal civilization of national beginning. In many instances. societal ties were shown to weaken because of a low capacity for reciprocality. The inability to reciprocate assistance from response was particularly apparent when the participants in exchange had really limited entree to resources.

Social category interpolation. brought by immigrants and possible chances. demonstrated a important relation to an immigrant’s entree to resources and ability to help those within societal webs. Male immigrants tended to hold stronger and larger societal webs than females and the wisdom of immigrants from older coevalss offered more successful information that had been acquired with age. The immigrant societal web experience of Mr. Raya was shaped by societal category interpolation and reflects of the societal context under which he was received.

Now 63. Mr. Raya migrated at the mature age of 31 with a clear aim in head: to do money. Mr. Raya stresses the economic facet and demand for labour market engagement in American society. “everyone wants to come over here. because the general thought is like. you come here. and the dollars are on the street. they’re in the tree ; you know. its easier to do dollars. Its non easy the manner the manner we work here” ( p. 1. 1. 14-16 ) . Mr. Raya’s perceptual experience of America prior to in-migration embodies the same spirit of the American Ideal and depicts the impression of societal mobility as being touchable by agencies of difficult work.

When first migrating to the United States. Mr. Raya was welcome by a friend who had agreed to assist him acquire settled. nevertheless was expected to work and supply for himself. Mr. Raya explains. “when we come over here we become Americans in an economic manner. ” He farther explains. “ Let’s say you want to convey your sister or your brother ; you bring them over. and as an American. O.K. . you help them for 2. 3 months. you tell’em you got ta wage rent. you got ta pay your nutrient. But up at that place no. You can remain at your parents house forever” ( p. 2. l. 28-30 ) .

In line with the literature. Mr. Raya highlights the displacement of outlooks for societal webs as one makes the passage from Latin-american to American context. Mr. Raya’s experience has shaped his perceptual experience of the manner in which friends and relations looking to migrate should be received into American society. Family Obligation Abrego ( 2009 ) examines the ways in which migratory parents’ gender affects the multinational families’ economic public assistance. The term transnational is used to depict households where “members of the atomic unit ( female parent. male parent. and kids ) live in two different countries” .

Common among migratory parents of transitional households was their pattern of directing of remittals. Abrego argues that households with transitional female parents are more likely to see economic prosperity compared to transitional father-away. households in which households with transitional male parents frequently received limited or no remittals. Gendered parental duties imply that work forces prioritize themselves or new relationships set up in the United States over their household back place. while imputing a strong respect for household values with female parents of transitional households.

Mr. Raya’s adolescent old ages spent in Peru were marked by utmost poorness and its unfortunate eventualities. Destitute conditions foreshadowed a life in Peru that was inactive and nothingness of hope. In an effort to invert his destitute destiny for his household. Mr. Raya’s determination to go forth Peru was persuaded by the economic chances that America had to offer. Although his household was out of sight. they were ne’er out of head when it came to his fiscal addition while life in America.

In contrast with the literature exemplifying the male. father figure as being self -interested and self- helping. Mr. Raya expresses his duty to back up his household. I was be aftering to travel to college but I couldn’t because I had to direct money to my childs. and my childs were in Peru” ( p. 2. 1. 3-4 ) . Unlike the experiences described by Abrego. Mr. Raya holds a high respect for household values that transcends material goods. “we were hapless. We didn’t have a auto. we didn’t have a house. But the chief thing for me is that we had a family… that was the basic ; loving your household first” ( p. . l. 7-11 ) . Family values defined his end to supply fiscal support for his full household was his chief inducement for in-migration.

Mr. Raya describes his aim. “ That was my chief end: assist my people. Send money to them ; to my childs. to my parents. And that. that portion made me experience good. Even though I mean my childs they were non with me but. they. my childs they had a good education” ( p. 2. 1. 10-13 ) . Although the separation from his kids is difficult for him. cognizing that they receive a good instruction assures Mr. Raya that he has served his responsibility to his household. Decision In the concluding analysis. Mr. Raya’s in-migration experience demonstrates how the places he occupies within the U. S. societal construction has influenced his ultimate sense of an American individuality. His personal experience in America as a Latino immigrant reveals his peculiar societal location in which his Latino-identity. motive for migrations. desire to absorb. legal consciousness and outlooks for response all contributed significantly to his behaviour and perceptual experiences.

When analyzing his experience in visible radiation of research. Mr. Raya’s successful incorporation mirrors many theories held sing Latino assimilation into American society. Mr. Raya recognizes that his Latino profile is one in which linguistic communication is declarative of his relation to the Latino-American population. and that larning English is imperative to his assimilation procedure. An active battle with the U. S. egal system while finding his migrator position has allowed for a positive averment of legality and provides Mr. Raya with a confident sense of belonging. Furthermore. the cardinal characteristic of Mr. Raya’ experience is his strong will to absorb. Dissimilar with decisions of related research. duty to carry through his function as a male parent and back up his household was the drive motivation behind his successful incorporation.

On the whole. his societal location has shaped his attitudes and sentiments toward Latino-immigration in general. He stresses the importance one’s capacity for accommodation to the American structural context in order to accomplish assimilation. and hence reach economic. societal and political success. Through an analysis of the Latino-American experience of David Raya. this essay demonstrates the important impact societal location has had on the formation of Mr. Raya’s American individuality as a Latino immigrant.