Ethical Hacking and the Case of Jeremy Hammond

An ethical hacker is also regarded as a “white hat”. is an individual or groups of individuals who has great knowledge of computer and general internet security. This person is usually employed by a company or organization to test security destruction internally. They find ways to break into the company ’s own system so that they can develop ways to stop anyone else from breaking into the organization’s private information. In a sense the person is hacking their own company of employment with good reason.

In the case of supposed ethical hacker Jeremy Hammond, many did not consider his tactics morally sound. Jeremy Hammond was a political activist and ethical hacker who due to a major controversial event is now serving a ten year prison sentence. Hammond gained some notoriety through his website hackthissite.org. Hackthissite.org was a website that trained people in ethical hacking.

Hammond wanted people to use the website to gain skills in better security within the internet.

He stressed that the site was not to be used for hacking unethically or for your own gain to acquire information, assume someone else‘s identity or create a sort of terror on the web for your own personal reasons. Based on this definition of ethical hacking Hammond provided upon his creation ofthe site. Hammond did not follow his own advice. thus causing his arrest in 2012 by the FBI. The cause of Hammond’s arrest nearly two years ago was that he was involved in the email leak.

Get quality help now

Marrie pro writer

Verified

Proficient in: Crime

5 (204)

“ She followed all my directions. It was really easy to contact her and respond very fast as well. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

along with WikiLeaks. of important global intelligence files in the event named the 201272013 Stratford email leak.

This event occurred when in October 2012 private information in email form of the global intelligence company clients under Stratford were posted on the Wikiteaks webpage. WikiLeaks informed the government that the group Anonymous. which Jeremy Hammond was a member of, originally gave the site the stolen the information. Hammond and other members of anonymous were referred to by an FBI informant and arrested soon after. The manner of which Jeremy Hammond was sentenced was somewhat harsh. The subject of leaking information for personal gain is a serious subject. Hammond. if truly guilty of the actions he was accused of, was not in the right of his actions. According to law hacking and providing the information you found to another company to expose it is illegal in America, It does not matter if the company in question is conducting unfair or illegal practices you will be punished with the crime of infiltrating a company ’5 system without their permission. As mentioned previously.

However, the sentence of which Hammond was given was somewhat extreme. Hammond was given ten years. starting in 2013 and being supervised three years after. It seemed as though that because Hammond found a scratch in the armor of a major company, he was to be made an example out of as if he was person committing terror on the internet. The government seemed to have felt that so that they did not have to out rightly admit to their own error of not keeping watch on said company so someone else had to be the scapegoat. In conclusion, ethical hacking is best to be done by someone who is employed by a company or someone who conducts ethical hacking on their own system so that they there will not be a question of whether or not someone leaked certain information. In other words, as Jeremy Hammond advised ethical hacking must be used to help and not to help yourself.