'The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas' Analysis

 The narrator in Ursula K. LeGuin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” is communicating that happiness is possibly more complicated than suffering and is more worthy of continued analysis; The author also contrasts our own society and way of life to the society of Omelas, where happiness governs. The narrator disputes that in our society happiness is something that isn’t hugely valued and is deemed as something that is “stupid.” We consider such things like evil and pain as particular and special.

The narrator contends that the huge problem of artists is that they deny to recognize that pain and evil are truly somewhat boring. 

The passage states “if you can’t lick’em join’em. If it hurts, repeat it. But to praise despair is to condemn delight, to embrace violence is to lose hold of everything else. We have almost lost hold; we can no longer describe a happy man, nor make any celebration of joy.

” The author is stating that the treason of the artist is that they view evil as extremely fascinating. Artists appreciate pain and anguish as they drive originality in artistry. Artists don’t see the everyday or regular nature of evil. They regard evil as extraordinary and significant in forms of art to make a show of, to write about and centralize stories. Evil is evident in many things today such as movies, games, books and more. In a sense, all this esteem and regard for evil exalts evil as though it is remarkable or noteworthy and could be classified as novel and original.

Get quality help now

Writer Lyla

Verified

Proficient in: The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas

5 (876)

“ Have been using her for a while and please believe when I tell you, she never fail. Thanks Writer Lyla you are indeed awesome ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

The narrator argues that there is nothing unusual about evil or pain. They are both fairly normal to our society and to our state in society. 

Consequently, the treason of the artist is to reject to view evil in this mindset. Artists admire our world. They see society as a place that shouldn’t contain pain and evil. For that reason, they resume their treason regarding evil and pain as more appealing over happiness and as something worth analyzing in life. Pain and evil are the main attractions. Our defiance to them, why and how we refuse to accept them, takes over our creative power as we compellingly contemplate over these basic components of our lives. For the duration of the story, the narrator is attempting to persuade the reader that Omelas is the ideal place even by referring to it’s “bad habit.” The narrator states that pain and evil are boring because even though one child is forced into everlasting unhappiness to guarantee the happiness of the general society, the remainder of the society is a captivating utopian place. Those who leave Omelas after finding out the truth have to be the people who don’t actually find the misery of one child boring or banal. 

The narrator is attempting to highlight the happiness of the people of Omelas through trying to predict our responses to it and contend that our own preference in our world for suffering and pain shouldn’t aid us in underrating the happiness of the citizens of Omelas or believe that they are by some means less sophisticated or dissimilar from ourselves.