Stem Cell Policy Changes

What is the Problem the public policy seeks to solve? This policy hopes to accomplish the ability for federally funded researchers to research more Embryonic stem cells that George Bush restricted. To allow for more research to be done on stem cells will create a heather and more efficient medical treatment to regenerate muscles and organs. With the research there is now stem cells have the ability to cure 10 diseases with many more to come with more research. Allowing research done will improve the community’s health and happiness.

How does the policy work? This policy is a modification to President Bush’s Stem cell policy form August 9, 2001, and will allow for an increase in the federal research on hundreds of viable Embryonic cells that got restricted.

This will allow for researchers the ability to have a better understanding to treatment certain disabling diseases and conditions. The Secretary of Health and Human Services has the responsibility to conduct worthy stem cell research.

To ensure that the federal funding is being used appropriately in research. This will include human embryonic stem cell research as well. Also, the Director of the NIH will have to review exciting guidelines on stem cell research to make sure that there is not anything that the new policy does not include. The Director will also need to create new safeguards and create new guidelines to ensure the consistency with other ES cells. The Secretary will also need to periodically review and update these guidelines. Lastly, the policy will not allow the limiting of federal funding on research that involves ES cells.

Get quality help now

Prof. Finch

Verified

Proficient in: Policy

4.7 (346)

“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

What is the budget implication of the policy?

According to the NIH, it states that the united states allow for roughly $745 million annually to Nonembryonic-Non-Human, about $516 million to Nonembryonic-Human, about 83 million on research like umbilical cord blood/ placenta for humans and non-humans in 2017. The states can fund their own private research. Some like California spend up to $500 million annually. The funding will come from the federal reserves with an increase in federal tax revenue and states funding will come from their own funds. What evidence do you have that the policy will improve one or more of the scoring dimensions? What counter-evidence exists? This policy has been successful for that the allowance to more research which improves the health of the people and non-humans (test subjects really). The policy creates a better compatibility with the use of stem cell transfusions then traditional methods like bone marrow transfusions.

This creates a higher success rate for the patients and improves their time of recovery. According to GAO, they state, “15,000 U.S. patients requested preliminary searches for the Registry form 1997 through 2000. This number represents 34 percent of the 44,740 patients estimated to be in need of stem cell transplants…” This shows the dire need for the research to be done to allow these penitents to get the best treatments that they desire. The increased number of penitents requesting for stem cell transfusions creates an even more need for stem cell donators. The GAO states that there are only 44,740 donors available to donate with only 1,550 of the donors’ cancels. With the donors to patient’s ratio being basically the same, there would need to be a creation of a better donator process to try and get more people to come and donate their stem cells. With more research on stem cells, the Elsevier came up with a hypothesis that with the use of hMSCs. They believe that they can use the stem cells to with therapeutic effects.

They ran some tests on rats and saw the difference in functional recovery when they use hMSC compared to other methods. With this in mind, stem cells could have the ability to help patients with ischemia. According to research done by Rita Anzalone who associates with Stem Cell Reviews and Reports shows that with the use of stem cells there could be a correlation with the treatment for type 1 diabetes. This could improve 1.25 million Americans who have this disorder. A negative thing that the policy has is the restriction of funds to all research. President Obama when revoking Bush’s policy and implementing the new one. He did not reverse the Dickey-Wicker amendment which is a law passed by Congress in 1996. In the law, it states that it has the ability to restrict the use of federal funding for creating, destroying, or knowingly injuring human embryos. So, this does not allow researchers the ability to fully engage in their research for that they are not able to get fully funded.

Work Cited

1. “Embryonic Stem Cell Research: A Decade of Debate from Bush to Obama” YJBM, September
2. 2009,https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2744932/
3. GPO “Executive Order 13505—Removing Barriers to Responsible Scientific Research Involving
4. Human Stem Cells Memorandum of March 9, 2009— Presidential Signing Statements Memorandum of March 9, 2009— Scientific Integrity”, Federal Register, March 11 2009, https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2009-03-11/pdf/E9-5441.pdf
5. “Estimates of Funding for Various Research, Condition, and Disease Categories (RCDC)”,
6. RePORT, May 18, 2018, https://report.nih.gov/categorical_spending.aspx
7. GAO “Bone Marrow Transplants Despite Recruitment Successes, National Program May Be
8. Underutilized” United States General Accounting Office, October 2002, https://www.gao.gov/assets/240/236082.pdf
9. “Therapeutic benefits of angiogenetic gene-modified human mesenchymal stem cells after
10. cerebral ischemia” Elsevier, March 2009, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014488608004329
11. Wharton’s Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cells as Candidates for Beta Cells Regeneration: …” Stem
12. Cell Reviews and Reports, October 23 2010, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12015-010-9196-4
13. “Dickey-Wicker Amendment, 1996”, The Embryo Project Encyclopedia, 2010-08-27,
14. https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/dickey-wicker-amendment-1996