The following example essay on “KS3 Strategy presentation” The has different types of informations, which could help them to solve different problems such as: helping under-achieving students, this could be done by helping them through whiechever way is best for the students and for the teachers.
This is a Powerpoint presention named “KS3 Strategy presentation”. When I firstly opened it, I had found it in the 97-2003 Presentation format. This is a powerpoint presentation made up of exactly 14 slides. It was given to me by my teacher, we just had to upload it from Fronter.
For example, in the whole presentation, the background is made up of a patterned pale green colour, which remains constant throughout the whole presentation. This shows us that it’s not actually suitable for children. This presentation has been created to give an overview about the different strategies that exists, the way they could be tackled, an overview of the national numbers, comparing datas and finally how parents and carers could do to help their children.
This presentation is simple, this is effective because it gives straight bullet points, nothing too complicated for the teachers, however there are a few words that could be misunderstood due to the fact that they are not common words used every day, an example for this would be “Dissemination”.
There are no photographs or cliparts in this Powerpoint presentation. The good side for this is that cliparts are not actually suitable for this kind of presentation, adults are not too keen on seeing cliparts, it might be childish for them.
The presentation also goes straight to the point, so no need for pictures. However the not so good feature could be that even adults can get bored sometimes, so without pictures it would make the whole presentation even boring. Appropriate photographs of students and teachers working together could be included. There are no buttons found on this Powerpoint presentation.
The good side for this is that it’s simple so it gets straight to the point. If the buttons were childish then they might not blend in with the rest of the presentation. However the not so good features is that simple buttons could actually look more professional. They don’t have to be in colour due to the fact that adults might not be too keen to see colourful buttons and it might not blend in with the background colour.
There are no animations found on this presentation. The good side for this is that it’s again simple, so it gets straight to the point, it looks more professional without having animations runnning all over th screens. It could also help parents to concentrate and follow what is being shown. However the not so good features is that suitable animations could actually help parents to lose concentration. They might be too colourful and inaproppriate, in other words, too childish.There were no drawn or computer graphics, the good side for this is that computer graphics, whatever the information might be, is seen as something little children do, it looks unprofessional and so there’s change again for the parents to actually loose concentration.
The colours used in this presentation is very limited. In this presentation, the background colour is a pale green patterned colour. In the text, the titles and sub-titles are in green, the normal writing has been written in black. The good features for this is that it does look professional and suitable for the target audience, it doesn’t have too many colours. On the other hand, the not so good features is that, just green and black could actually make the audience lose their concentration. It has nothing attractive to it.The text body throughout the presentation has been written in “Times New Roman”, font size 28. The good feature is that it’s visible even from a far distance, so an appropriate font has been chosen.
However, there are words that might be not be clearly understood, an example for this could be the word “dissemination”. Some teachers might know what it means but I don’t think that they would have really understood it’s meaning. The other thing is that there are a few spelling mistakes in the presentation, and this makes the prensentation look unprofessional. An example for a mis-written word is that “underattainers”. The information and the way it had been laid out, does look professional. The good features are that they have been bullet-pointed so it’s simple and goes straight to the point. On the other hand, the not so good feature is that uncommon words have been used, so the audience might not fully understand what is being shown.
There are no sounds in this presentation. The good features is that that it looks more professional without music and sounds. It is actually more suitable for the target audience this way. However, the not so good feature is that without music the presentation looks kind of tedious which might again make the teachers lose their interest in what is being shown. There are no videos in this presentation but a video is being mentioned on slide 11.
This is a good feature because it attracts the reader’s attention again after some texts. However the not so good features is that there are no links linking the video to the presentation. This may be seen as unprofessional. There’s actually nothing but the mouse clicks that actually lead you from one slide to another when on full screen mode, this is one of the put-downs. The other not so good feature is that it looks simple, nothing effective to keep tha audience or teacher’s mind focus on the prensetation. On the other hand, without any type of navigation and just simple clicks, it makes it more simple and makes it look more professional.
The presentation is suitable for it’s target audience, however in my opinion, there are a few changes that could be made to improve the whole presentation. There are a few obvious mistakes that could actually be spotted by teachers and which could lead them to confusion. A few of the major mistakes are that: the contents page is found on slide 12, 2 slides before the end, when it should have been found slide 2 after the title page. Another mistake is that slide 5, has a title “News from the LEA” but that’s about it. There’s no body text and no pictures or anything. It is effective and in my opinion the number of types of elements used is appropriate. However there could have been a few pictures inserted with a video or a video link as it was suggested. This would have grabbed the audience’s focus from time to time.
It does meet its aim and it is suitable for its target audience. However there a few things that could have been changed to make the whole presentation more effective, a few of those improvements are: adding a few pictures, have the slides in the right order, have no speeling mistakes and make sure that no hard words are used so that it meets its aim, if noone understands the words, then the text would not be understood, this means that the message would not effectively go through to the audience and so will not achieve its aim. The presentation does describe its purpose and who will benefit from it, but however as I had mentioned earlier on, the slides aren’t in the right order so it actually confuses the audience about what it what. If the slides were put in the right order and simple vocabulary was used, then everything would be clearly understood.
This is a presentation and most teachers do know how to use it, and introductory tip could actually be a put-down for the whole presentation. Powerpoint presentations do not usually need introductory tips, if any of the audience was stuck somewhere they could ask questions or check on the “Microsoft help” search engine. The presentation has been arranged in a very confusing manner, there’s also a slide with no body text on, which makes the presentation even more confusing. The contents page can also be found on slide 12 when it should have been on page 2. This actually gets the audience confused, so if it was put there for a purpose then it should have probably been stated more clearly.
The aims have been partially met but there’s spave for more improvements such as arranging it in order, addind pictures or a video, no spelling mistakes and so on. The aims have been partially met like I’ve said before, this is because even though the order is not logical, the text is still there, it is simple and understandable, in most occasions, in some slides it wasn’t really clear. Some slides are not in a logical order, some have spelling mistakes, not even one picture or a video had been included, the vocabulary is sometimes too firm and hard to understand. If these changes were made, then the aims would have been fully met.
KS3 Strategy Presentation. (2019, Dec 07). Retrieved from https://paperap.com/paper-on-powerpoint-presention/