An Introduction to the Analysis of Rostows Theory

Rostow’s theory is arguable the most successful outline that countries need to follow to become developed. The green revolution is a perfect outlet point to apply this plan of progress. Taking place mainly between the 1940s and 1960s the green revolution increased agricultural production worldwide and saved many people from starvation. Countries that were not as developed as the US leaned towards Rostow’sfive-step plan to provide for their countries and to grow economically. The green revolution was a great way of using the natural resources provided to economically develop a country.

Third-world countries combined Rostow’s five-point plan with access to resources to further develop. This method proved very successful for countries that followed it closely. Rostow says that to become developed you must spend sufficient time on each level of development. Some longer than others depending on your current economic success. Short term the green revolution was a great f the progress of some countries but long term I believe the revolution has caused bigger problems that we are beginning to see.

Of course short term there was a dramatic increase in the yield that farmers were getting which helped their economic situation and eventually improve their quality of life. Another plus side of the green revolution was better farming technology by employing two or three crop patterns. Along with the new technology for farming newer more developed seeds were produced that produce a better yield and that are more resistant to diseases. This was very new technology but with the new seeds comes new chemical fertilizer that was harming the land.

Get quality help now

KarrieWrites

Verified

Proficient in: Green Revolution

5 (339)

“ KarrieWrites did such a phenomenal job on this assignment! He completed it prior to its deadline and was thorough and informative. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Short term this was not a big deal but now a lot of the land that has been farmed is drying up making it unusable for future produce. This is becoming a big problem because during the green revolution the land was never able to rest and now countries that were producing so much are seeing major problems. A good example of how these new farming technologies are hurting the earth comes from the video about the green revolution in Argentina. Chemicals are being used in farms that go down and contaminate groundwater affecting our children’s health. Pesticides are also being sprayed that are causing birth defects in the young. That makes you think is it worth it, using up every single natural resource for capital, or do the negatives that come along with this outweigh the positives. For states or countries that do not have the technology for an industrial revolution, they have figured out how to apply RRoslow’sfive stages of growth and combined it with the natural resources they are given. In the short term, this is a great way to develop but it can bring you so far economically with very high ecological cost. Even wildlife like birds and many other insects are being killed off by these strong chemicals, which is a huge loss in the long term.

Modernization at this level des a hard effect on the environment. It makes you think about the short-term positives vs. the long-term negatives. A country can have this short-term economical progress but ecologically destroy the environment they live in. Overall the green revolution made food production easier it created a time to get food cheaper than at any point in history. But again in the long term the incorp, oration of industry in agriculture has brought about some alarming ecological consequences that are irreversible. Farming has turned into a race, a race to keep food production ahead of population, which unfortunately requires taking every possible natural resource from the earth, an extraction that cannot be replenished.