The United States can tighten gun laws and regulations without repealing the Second Amendment by increasing penalties, strengthening communications, and increasing wait time to purchase firearms. For hundreds of years, Americans have had firearms for sports or for protection. According to the Second Amendment to the Constitution, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This is based somewhat on old English law and English Bill of Rights of 1689. However in the last few years, there have been many incidents where firearms have been involved with multiple killings or injuries.
This list includes the shootings at Aurora, Colorado, Newtown, Connecticut, and Washington D.C. As a result, some have suggested repealing or changing the Second Amendment.
Each state has laws pertaining to the sale, purchase, and registration of firearms. Some states may have stricter laws than others. The enforcement of existing laws may also vary by location. Some state and local officials may not or cannot strictly enforce them.
Authorities can increase penalties for people caught violating the laws.
Local officials may not have modern or updated equipment to check the background of people trying to buy firearms. They need to rule out a criminal background or a history of mental health problems before purchasing. Communication and data sharing between states and between state and local officials may be an issue. A person with a conviction of a crime could go to another state and try to purchase a weapon. You could provide funding locally for technology upgrades.
That way, a person applying for a handgun in a town can be checked out thoroughly and would have the technology to pick up anything. There needs to be some sort of national database where state and local officials and firearm dealers could get and share information on buyers and purchases.
The wait time to purchase a weapon varies from state to state. Some wait times are short and do not allow enough time to properly check for past criminal or mental history. A person with a violent criminal past in one state may get approved in another. Setting a longer waiting time to obtain a weapon could give everyone a chance to investigate any criminal background or any history of mental health problems. Therefore, you lessen the chances of someone who should not have a weapon slip through the cracks.
In conclusion, the Second Amendment to the Constitution should not be the subject of elimination. It was created by the founders of our country as a way to protect the law abiding citizens. If you repeal the Second Amendment, this would not stop criminals from obtaining firearms. A repealing would cause a large disapproval from a fairly substantial part of the population. There are ways to support and adjust existing laws regarding the sale, distribution, and use of firearms without an outright revoking of the Second Amendment.
Keep the Second Amendment. (2023, Jan 12). Retrieved from https://paperap.com/an-argument-against-repealing-the-second-amendment-in-the-us-on-the-issue-of-gun-control/