The Second Amendment The Two Different Opinions on Gun Laws in America

The second amendment generally holds two different opinions on the gun laws that have been created over time. Having the right to bear arms is what amendment two is all about, but people have a lot to argue about with it. Although it seems short and simple when reading in the Bill of Rights, somehow there is still a huge issue with it. Considering many citizens are going to court for believing their right to the second amendment had been violated.

There are many problems with gun laws all over the country and not every state has the same laws, therefore some may violate the second amendment and some may not.

Confliction happens most time in the thought that we need to protect ourselves, but then there is another worry that a gun might go into the wrong hands. With such a small section of the Bill of Rights, there come many tough situations, of course, that’s why we have the court to decide what went wrong.

Some citizens believe that the right to bear arms goes for all individuals, making it able for people to own guns for protection and self-defense. On the other hand, many people believe that the right to bear arms only goes to the ones considered soldiers. Amendment two is all about gun laws, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”(Bill of Rights) and how the differing opinions come about will be explained further on.

Get quality help now

Marrie pro writer

Verified

Proficient in: Second Amendment

5 (204)

“ She followed all my directions. It was really easy to contact her and respond very fast as well. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

One of most known opinions lately comes from Barack Obama, which you may know already. However, even though the President has an opinion, many people disagree with him, there have been disagreements for a very long time now.

There was a case involving the right to bear arms where two different opinions did not cooperate. This was the District of Columbia v. Heller case in 2008 while Columbia didn’t allow handguns to be registered. Heller realised this when he wanted a handgun at home, “He applied for a one-year license for a handgun he wished to keep at home, but his application was denied.” although he wasn’t happy about it. Police officer Dick Heller had disagreed with the District of Columbia and felt he had a right within the second amendment. The conclusion to this case is that the votes came very close as they were 5-4 and the court believed that “militia” should not only mean those in relation to the military. The court also believed that banning a gun that is used for protection in an area that highly needs protection is violating the second amendment.

Most situations you find that an individual believed they had a right to bear arms because of the second amendment. Although the problem comes along when the area or district disagrees and makes owning a gun illegal in order to protect and keep criminals down. Every state decides in different ways how they want to handle firearm laws. An example of this would be “Massachusetts is one of five states that ban stun guns and Tasers for private citizens” (Eugene Volokh) where a homeless woman had been located with a stun gun. Jaime Caetano had been abused by her ex-boyfriend and was only carrying this around for her own protection, like most individuals. The reasoning for this not working out for Jaime is the fact she is homeless and has been carrying around a stun gun and even with her explanation, Massachusetts still didn’t allow the stun gun.

On a different hand, California allowed unlicensed and unloaded guns to be carried, this is something completely different to Massachusetts considering it isn’t a stun gun. For the court case of Peruta v. San Diego, “Mr. Peruta and the other plaintiffs were entitled to concealed carry permits.” (Joseph Greenlee) while the homeless woman in Massachusetts wasn’t even allowed a stun gun. Differing states are a huge impact in this country as the laws are different and some citizens are still trying to push for individual gun rights yet have the hardest time doing so. The people want to be protected but they want to be their own protection as they feel it’s the best decision. Both opinions are understandable and are in use for the same reason, protection. Our biggest problem is, how do we keep guns out of criminals reach?

With every problem involving the second amendment come two different opinions, is the right for soldiers or individuals too? These problems have not been solved clearly because even today gun rights is a huge issue and it may be forever a problem when it comes to guns. The most difficult part is keeping safety when an individual wants their right to own a gun it’s usually in need of safety for themselves and family. However, when a state decides to ban guns, this is also for safety because they feel it will keep criminals down as we see awful shootings too often. Although both sides want safety and protection, they clash like crazy and that’s where all the problems come from. Citizens want to own guns but don’t want criminals to get a hold of them and for any state that is extremely difficult.