Article Analysis Thomas Mappes

The following sample essay on “Article Analysis Thomas Mappes” talks about coercion and deception among individuals who are guilty of using another person without their informed voluntary consent. He tries to determine when it is wrong for one person to use another as a means to benefit the user and when one is guilty of sexually using another person.

Mappes says that using another person is acceptable when that both parties have given their voluntary informed consent. Information must be presented to enable persons to voluntarily decide whether or not to participate.

It is to ensure respect for persons through provision of thoughtful consent for a voluntary act.

Persons may give their voluntary informed consent while not knowing all the facts. A person may withhold the truth or fill the “truth” with false information to get the person to participate. Another way of one using another would be by coercion. There are two types of coercion. “Occurrent” coercion which involves the use of physical force and “dispositional” coercion involves the threat of physical force.

Mappes is not saying that using another person is always morally wrong, because we use other people for our own ends all the time. We use a physician to keep ourselves healthy and the physician uses his patients for his lively hood.

Each of the parties uses the other group to fulfill their own task, based on the voluntary participation and their given consent. Both parties respect each other and realize that they have the right to do with their lives as they see fit, and should not be coerced into doing something that would violate their rights as a human being.

Get quality help now

WriterBelle

Verified

Proficient in: Communication

4.7 (657)

“ Really polite, and a great writer! Task done as described and better, responded to all my questions promptly too! ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

If someone will not give their consent on a particular situation, then that is their right and it should not be violated. If someone wanted to get consent from someone who was reluctant to do so, then they might immorally use them by one of two ways.