Oppression In The Handmaid's Tale

The following academic paper highlights the up-to-date issues and questions of Oppression In The Handmaid’s Tale. This sample provides just some ideas on how this topic can be analyzed and discussed.

Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale delves good into the horrid nature of utmost control and immoral restrictions in specifying the corrupt theocratic authorities at big. and more specifically the consequence this control has on the society’s adult females. In an age in which a freshly emerged and unmerciful governmental system called the Republic of Gilead has “put life back to the in-between ages.

” sparked by a widespread terror of sterility. personal freedom and individualism have become unthinkably decreased ( Genny 1 ) .

Handmaids selected to populate in the houses of affluent. well-respected twosomes go through a life wholly designed by the authorities for the exclusive intent of bearing kids. Caught between following the rigorous regulations made for adult females by the Republic and interrupting them in secret for the interest of her saneness.

the supporter Offred basically but non purposefully offers close to nil for her society’s benefit.

Not allowed to read. compose. talk her ideas or even look another in the oculus. the most she can offer proves to be occasional. well-monitored food market errands and the little possibility of supplying the gift of life for an elect Commanding officer and his Wife. Parallel to a dystopia in which Offred has been stripped of the most simplistic allowances. adult females in today’s assorted Middle Eastern societies find comparatively equal trouble in using their strengths due to the terrible suppression and forced construction of their day-to-day lives.

Get quality help now

writer-Charlotte

Verified

Proficient in: Culture

4.7 (348)

“ Amazing as always, gave her a week to finish a big assignment and came through way ahead of time. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Handmaid’s Tale Oppression Essay

Regardless of the changing context of these two scenarios. they both present themselves problematically in visible radiation of women’s personal battle to lend in society—in both Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and the modern Middle East. apparently unethical yet utmost theocratic authorities exercises illustrations of such radically unformed control over its people that the development and demeaning of the natural rights of adult females become prevailing.

But on what evidences should the male citizens of the Republic of Gilead and those in today’s foreign communities be granted more release and chance while the adult females are held more confined of their ain independency? As Offred finds herself trapped in such an unreasonably restrained living state of affairs. she instinctively recognizes the current deficiency of available free will because she one time knew what freedom looked and felt like.

For illustration. in resistance of her preparation as a servant with the Aunts. she can non assist but roll her ind back to the pre-Republic yearss “thousands of old ages before. ” when she and fellow females could really travel to school and ticker “movies of the remainder of the world” that even included “dancing [ . ] vocalizing. ceremonial masks. [ and music ] . ” clearly taking topographic point in a land where “people…were happy” ( Atwood 118 ) . Offred every bit good as other servants in her topographic point necessarily endure within their world by seeking to keep a appreciation on the memories of such privileges they one time took for granted. such as existent telecasting to advance quality instruction.

Alternatively of populating the of course broad life of chance that was one time available to Offred and existed in her place and school life. such a vision has been taken off by the authorities and exists now merely in her memory. as the Aunts present to her and the other possible servants a government-approved movie with “the rubric and [ few ] names blacked out…with a crayon so [ they ] couldn’t read them”—another illustration of a farcical restraint. reading. that could hold instilled fruitful possibilities in the head of a adult female ( Atwood 119 ) .

In add-on. as if the remembrance of commissioned instruction and other past events were non plenty a cause of yearning. Offred besides recalls the fearless. authorising liquors of her late loved ones—particularly her female parent whom she spots in the movie. “wearing the sort of outfit Aunt Lydia told [ the servants ] was typical of Unwomen in those days” while “smiling. laughing…and raising [ her ] fists in the air” ( Atwood 119 ) .

To witness such a wild and free spirit in action. that one time was allowed for adult females but has been officially banned by the extremist Christian followerss of the Republic of Gilead. doubtless sparks a deep enticement within servants to arise against this authorization bring downing such “unacceptable losingss of rational liberty” ; nevertheless. such a enticement proves to be a challenge to prosecute for some adult females today ( Tolan 1 ) .

While the initial instructions of Islam attempted to better life conditions for Muslim adult females by allowing them some of the same rights as work forces in the 7th century. adult females become incapable of backing these rights when their society efforts to implement the “laws” of the Islamic faith. described by the Columbia University professors who wrote At the Crossroads of the World: Womans in the Middle East: Today. many Muslim adult females do non hold the chance to bask rights one time considered theirs by their faith.

Womans may be unaware of their rights or live in societies where these rights have been misinterpreted or misrepresented by persons in power ( be it the province. civilization. or household ) . In Moslem states around the universe. there is a cardinal difference between what is prescribed by spiritual texts and what is really practiced. a gulf between the ideal and the existent ( Esposito 1998. thirteen ) .

Frequently. the supposedly ‘religiously grounded’ limitations placed on adult females within certain societies have small or nil to make with the instructions of Islam. More frequently they are a map of socioeconomic and political factors. Recent illustrations of such limitations included Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. which prohibited adult females from having medical attending from males and placed other limitations on their motion in public ( Revolutionary Association of the Women in Afghanistan ) ( Crocco. Pervez. and Katz 110 ) .

At most. these adult females are granted with the semblance that they possess legitimate freedoms. when in actuality their authorities prohibits this executing with the false justification that it merely conforms to the Islamic faith. The servants and all adult females likewise governed by the Republic of Gilead correspondingly must follow the regulations of the government that claims to be runing in the name of the Christian religion in an effort to formalize its restrictive kernel.

Therefore. no inquiry exists as to how Offred becomes “increasingly foolhardy with her actions and behaviours. ” or to why in the terminal “there is the strong possibility that her foolhardiness has cost her her life” ( Genny 1 ) . Most decidedly does Offred’s state of affairs come off as unjust when she eventually experiences a little gustatory sensation of the natural freedom she one time had but still deserves. Because it is evidently an “oasis of the forbidden. ” she has to coerce herself to “hold…absolutely rigid” when the Commander invites her into his out-of-bounds personal sod to play a game of Scrabble. something harmless. yet banned.

Despite “ [ T ] he fact that [ she’s ] terrified. ” Offred still recognizes that “this is freedom [ ; ] an eyeblink of it. ” as if “he were offering her drugs” ( Atwood 138-139 ) . While Atwood implies in her novel that “feminist Utopianism can non avoid the contamination of dictatorship. ” she employs the construct of rebelliousness in that Offred can nurture her natural inclinations to really bask herself through interrupting the regulations ( Tolan 30 ) .

Similarly for the adult females in Iraq. the Ba’ath Party that emerged in 1963 sought commissariats for women’s equality. including the autonomies of instruction and employment ; nevertheless. outside the major urban centre of Baghdad. “the society still relegated Iraqi adult females to a really inferior place vis-a-vis men” ( Brown and Romano 1 ) . To keep two next communities with such contrasting ways of regulating adult females is arguably beliing and hence. a cause for concern.

Ultimately. adult females have simplistically natural rights that ought non to be rendered in the least. particularly by illicit theocratic authoritiess. Under no fortunes are the rights to believe. determination. reading. and composing. among many others. capable of being outlawed justifiably. regardless of gender. With such autonomies. adult females carry great possible in lending to society. despite the possibility of sterility or radically spiritual devotion—and in a batch of instances. that part can be imperative.

Today in Iraq. a adult female can non have private belongings or keep any position. while forced to give up her instruction and get married a alien. However. adult females still make up 65 % per centum of the population. and do up 70 % of the agricultural work force ( Al-Jawaheri and Harris ) . Though they continue to contend for the equal rights and intervention they deserve while accepting their low fortunes. the important importance of allowing adult females this moral approval remains strong.