Hamlet Drawing Ideas

Shakespearean tragedies had an insurmountable influence on English literature ND literary criticism; with the themes and meanings of Hamlet being agreed upon for generations. Hamlet’s flaw was clear, his inability to act is a Shakespearean way of Impressing “the truth that action Is the chief end of existence. ” In the modern era however, deconstructionists and revisionists have torn down these established criticisms and replaced them with a melange of interpretations drawing upon Freudian psychoanalysis, the theories of critical gender and racial scholars, and the contextual Ideals of New Historicism.

These new theories decry the Romantic view hat Hamlet’s flaw Is his Inaction, Instead positing that “dithering [and] blathering” lead to his downfall. Both of these popularizing interpretations are fallacious constructs; instead, Hamlet’s tragic flaw is his paranoia, which manifests itself through both inaction and rash hyperactivity. In order to analyze the tragic flaw of Prince Hamlet, one must first understand the strengths of his character. Hamlet truly is a “man living in meditation.

” His intellectual faculties are unmatched by any character in the play.

All of the characters in Hamlet are members of the royal court, from Polonium the elder testaments and advisor, to Horopito the scholar, to the trusted courtesans Reassurance and Guilelessness. Despite being surrounded by Denmark leading lights Hamlet’s intellect is prominently displayed by his rhetorical brilliance and beauty, with his paranormals evoking the courtly teachings of Balderdash Castigation. No rhetorical flourish goes unused during Hamlet’s many conversations, speeches, and soliloquies.

The famous “To Be Or Not To Be” soliloquy contains both anaphora and assonated In the same sentence, “to die: to sleep/To sleep, perchance to dream.

Get quality help now

writer-Charlotte

Verified

Proficient in: Plays

4.7 (348)

“ Amazing as always, gave her a week to finish a big assignment and came through way ahead of time. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

” His excoriating beech on human nature to Reassurance and Guilelessness in Act Two, Scene Two employs slight of hand rivaling David Vernon. A rhetorical question first appears to be answered with the traditional metaphysical worldview of the day, but then shifts into revealing the Renaissance belief on the “quintessence of dust” being the true state of mankind. This lexicographical illusion requires prodigious intellect, particularly given its extemporaneous nature.

Hamlet’s Intellect Is not limited to the spoken word. He understands that the subconscious mind of Claudia will cause him to reveal his guilt during the play; a splay of remarkable psychoanalysis, particularly considering the pre-Freudian world Hamlet inhabits. On matters historical, Hamlet’s intellect remains acute; by having the “election light upon Firstborns” with his “dying voice,” Hamlet shows his understanding of the ancient rights which give Fortifiers claim over Denmark throne. Through this rhetorical brilliance, armchair psychology, and historical 1 OFF which Coleridge lectured on.

This does not mean however, that the intellect is responsible for Hamlet’s fall because it causes inaction. Even the charge of inaction demands Hamlet’s acquittal; or he commits many actions throughout the play. Hamlet murders his ex-girlfriend’s father, successfully navigates the web of intrigue present at Elisions, valorously duels with Alerter, and finally vanquishes his usurping uncle. Indeed, the very reason Alerter wanted to duel Hamlet was because Hamlet had acted to kill both his sister and father. Hamlet’s actions kill at least five of the characters in the play.

The story of Papyrus, as told by the First Player, whose vengeance “made mulch the burning eyes of heaven/and passion in the gods,” denounced rash and unconsidered retaliation; ND Hamlet understood that he needed to carefully execute Classis’s execution if he is too truly avenge his father’s demise. As a product of the Victorian era, Hamlet wanted Claudia to burn in eternal damnation, and it was this desire which caused him to delay striking down Claudia, not fear or indecisiveness. Hamlet’s desire to see Claudia have “his heels… Kick at heaven/ and that his soul may be as damns and black/ as hell is a microcosm of his actual tragic flaw, which was paranoia, both Justified and unjustified. Hamlet was so worried about Claudia possibly going to heaven that he delayed murdering the usurper. This same paranoia manifests itself in Hamlet’s demands of Aphelia to “get [to] a nunnery,” as his mother’s betrayal has left Hamlet distrusting of even the loving Aphelia. Furthermore, Hamlet’s decent into madness through his “antic disposition” is hastened by a paranoia required for Hamlet to survive in the spider web of intrigue woven by Classis’s schemes.

In order to elude the machinations led by Polonium the spymaster, Hamlet is forced to constantly question the motives of everyone around him. The buffoonery of Reassurance and Guilelessness hides their true motivation: the utter ruin of Hamlet. Hamlet uncovers this motivation, and outwits the hapless routines, sending them to their demise in England. This clever triumph required Hamlet’s paranoia, but this selfsame paranoia which allows Hamlet to survive brings about much of the plays tragedy.

This paradoxical flaw of paranoia is also responsible for the “dithering” and “blathering” of which Seams Haney accuses Hamlet. Hamlet stabs Polonium through a curtain because his paranoia leads him to believe that the “wretched, rash, intruding fool” is actually Claudia. Hamlet even refers to Polonium as a “rat,” the colloquialism for a traitor. Upon realizing he has not slain Claudia, but rather Polonium, Hamlet does not apologize. Rather, his paranoia allows him to continue screaming at Gertrude, accusing her of collusion in King Hamlet’s murder, a crime Hamlet has no proof of her committing.

Hamlet needs no evidence however, as paranoia allows him to connect her “[blurring] the grace and blush of modesty’ with being an active conspirator in murder. This is the hyperactive conclusions of a man driven mad by the paranoia he needs to survive in the insane world around him. It is this paranoia which is responsible for both Hamlet’s inaction, and his hyperactive. In his writings on political life, the Greek philosopher and polymath Aristotle sited that all ideas start with a thesis, are opposed by their polar opposite, the antithesis, and are then combined in a synthesis.

This process produces the moderate Ana correct result. In ten realm AT literary criticism, tons nouns true tongue the modern era. The thesis of the Romantic traditionalists has been countered with the antithesis of modern revisionists such as Seams Haney. The synthesis of their ideas and ideals is to Justly conclude that paranoia was Hamlet’s tragic flaw, with its’ manifestations being both tragic inaction and tragic hyper-action.