1- HIS tone was honest, calm and reasonable. He started by belonging himself to both Identities (Lebanese and French) by explaining with patience. But at the end he had a trouble to identify his identity and he tried to have only one.
2- Identify who you think is the author’s intended audience. His audiences are those who have multiple identities and become normalized. Also who deal with them (fanatics and anopheles).
3- Search through the article and highlight all the passages that seem to you to be contributing to the thesis of the essay.
Then write thesis in your own words. The thesis of the essay is that the person shouldn’t have to define himself or his identity to people if he were raised according to different cultures. It’s unfair to him – as It Is to other people – to have to choose between certain aspects of his identity or even hide those facts and save them for a deferent group of people that can cope with those different sides.
“The Identity can’t be compartmentalized “.
4- Define the word “xenophobe “using either a dictionary or context clues? How does using the word “xenophobe” develop Mallow’s overall thesis? It means people that fear or hate foreigners. And it develops the overall thesis because that group of people make person with two identities feels lack of understanding and mistrust. So they will have a bad effect on the society by making who have dual identities normalized.
5- using context clues, what do you think the word “normalized” means? How does the author become normalized? It means people who have unimportant and powerless position in the society.
The author became one of them cause he was born in Lebanon, and lived most of his life in France. So, he can’t say that he is French because some people look at him as a traitor. On the other hand he can’t say that he Is Lebanese because he will feel lack of understanding and hostility. And because of the differences In religion and cultures between both society.
What is Mallow’s tone in the beginning of the essay? How does this change at the end? His tone was honest, calm and reasonable. He started by belonging himself to both identities (Lebanese and French) by explaining with patience.But at the end he him – as it is to other people – to have to choose between certain aspects of his identity or even hide those facts and save them for a different group of people that can cope with those different sides. “The identity can’t be compartmentalized “. Using context clues, what do you think the word “normalized” because he was born in Lebanon, and lived most of his life in France. So, he can’t say can’t say that he is Lebanese because he will feel lack of understanding and hostility. And because of the differences in religion and cultures between both society.
Deadly Identities. (2019, Nov 27). Retrieved from https://paperap.com/paper-on-deadly-identities-by-amin-maalouf-analysis/