Fillemon Johannes; 201602792; Curriculum Development

1

CODeL ASSIGNMENT COVER

2019 ACADEMIC YEAR

Course/Module Name Course/Module

Code

Curriculum Development and Practice CFC3702

Assignment no

(e.g. 1, 2 or 3, etc.).

1

Student Name Fillemon Johannes

Student number 201602792

Email Address [email protected]

Cell/Tel no 0853111370

CODeL Centre Windhoek

2

Table of Contents

Section A ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. …….. 3

Section B ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. …….. 6

References ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. …. 10

3

Section A

1.

1.

? The syllabus is portrayed as the outline of the themes secured or units to be instructed

within the specific subject AND curriculum allude to the overall content, instructed in

an in structive framework or a course (Engelbrecht, 2008) .

? Syllabus is descriptive in nature, but the curriculum is prescriptive.

? The curriculum includes a more extensive scope than the syllabus. A syllabus is derived

from the curriculum

(Kandjeo -Marenga, 2014)

2.

? Syllabus implies the subjects as well as the themes secured within the course of study.

On the other hand, curriculum infers the chapters and scholastic content instructed in

school or college (Kandjeo -Marenga, 2014) .

3.

? Lesson plans depict in detail what and how an instructor intends to instruct on a day -to-

day basis; the arrangement of activities, understudy gathering, and assets utilized.

On

the other hand, curriculum may be a handle for recording what substance and abilities

are really instructed in a classroo m, school, or district amid a longer period .

? Lesson plans are done according to the curriculum

(Engelbrecht, 2008)

4.

? Curriculum which is “the subjects comprising a course of study in a school or college.”

Have to be implemented first for it to be in effect. As implementation means “the

process of putting a decision or plan into effect; execution.

Get quality help now
Sweet V
Verified

Proficient in: Biology

4.9 (984)

“ Ok, let me say I’m extremely satisfy with the result while it was a last minute thing. I really enjoy the effort put in. ”

+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

”

? After the designation of curriculum, it will be put into action which is called

implementation

(Wolfaardt, Curri culum development and practices, 2012)

5.

? Assessment is an aspect of curriculum ; it is done based on the curriculum (Wolfaardt,

Assessment and Evaluation, 2014) .

4

2. According to (Eisner & Vallance, 1974) as cited in (Wolfaardt, Curriculum development

and practices, 2012) they described the primarily concerns of the five conceptions of

curriculum as follows;

a)

? Primarily concerned with the refinement of intellectual operations

? Concerned with understanding the processes by which learning occurs in

the classroom

? Centers on the how not the what, abilities that can be connected to

fundamentally anything;

? What is the learner’s relationship with the materials?

? Centers on the child, not the social setting, improvement of cognitive

aptitudes that are generalizable.

b)

? focus is mainly on the techniques that teachers use to present learning

content

? too centers on process; how learning is communicated or encouraged,

? a value -free framework; brief and to the point,

? the dialect of generation, frameworks to deliver learning in predicable ways;

not as value -neutral

c)

? emphatically esteem immersed; child centered;

? centers strongly on substance; people find for themselves; (The present

experience of the learner is a major focus )

? emphasizes individual growth;

? gives coordinates encounters; substance and devices for self -discovery;

? orientated towards emotional, psychological, spiritual growth and

development

d)

? solid accentuation on the association to the bigger social setting;

? stresses societal needs over person needs;

5

? specialist for social alter;

? Devices for person survival in a changing world;

? Issues of political control be incorporated; two bunches (1) ve rsatile, more

preservationist and (2) reformists, more forceful authority.

e)

? most tradition -bound;

? social transmission of the built up disciplines;

? represent mental movement at its best;

? Hutchins, ” bring out our common humankind, instead of our individ uality”;

? a few later alter in inflexibility, experiencing considerable alter

3. (Wolfaardt, Curriculum development and practices, 2012) explained them as follows:

a) “It can be referred to as the planned program of objectives, content, learning

experiences, resources and assessment offered by a school. It can also be referred to as

the planned course of study. (pp . 16) ” E.g. Biology content as a subject

b) “This is every thing that is learnt during school activities that is not a designated part of

the official curriculum. It is everything that is “picked up” e.g. the role of the teacher,

learner, status, attitudes to learning and everything that is not “officially prescri bed” in

the official curriculum for it is implicit, embedded and taken -for -granted procedures

and materials.” (pp. 17)

c) Is characterized as experientially based in terms of substance and instructing strategies

that accentuates the viable side of the subjects e.g. engine mechanics in VTC .

d) Could be a wide explanation of the largely inspirations for a course as such to create

an understanding of the hypothesis behind an educational modules or a subject to create

pertinent abilities. E.g. Life science aim; Scientific skills (Ministry of Education, 2015)

e) May be a general explanation for the ultimate result to be accomplished and it serve as

a premise for decision -making, e.g. at the end of this course an understudies ought to

be able to compose within the Biology dialect.

f) Is an exact, precise depiction of required result from learners, e.g., an understudy ought

to be able to clarify how blood circulate all through the human body (M inistry of

Education, 2015) .

6

Section B

1. Agreeing to (Olivia & Kirkland, 2012) as cited in (Wolfaardt, Curriculum development

and practices, 2012) , there is the taking after Six -Step Approach to curriculum designing.

Step 1 : Problem identification.

? Distinguish and characterize the issue and know what precisely what ought to be

tended to.

Step 2 : Needs assessment of learners

? Curriculum designer must know who your target audience is and what the target

gathering of people needs.

Step 3 : Goals and objectives

? When designing curriculum, you must distinguish the conclusion towards which

the exertion is directed. Decide the objectives and targets, whereby they are

particular and quantifiable that will coordinate the choice of curricular substance,

clearly communicate the purpose to all, and recommend what learning strategies

will be most effective to accomplish the objectives and destinations.

Step 4 : Educational s trategies

? Distinguish the instructive methodologies by which the curricular exercises will

be accomplished, and Indeed include the substance and methodology. The

designer must give the implies by which curricular objectives are to be

accomplished.

Step 5 : Implementation

? The designer must have now to recognize adequate assets, support, and other

components to effectively execute the curriculum.

Step 6 : Evaluation and feedback.

? After gone through and done with the previous steps, t he arrange to assess the

ad equacy of the curriculum must be depicted . All the loose ends must be closed

and g ive data almost nonstop for quality advancement.

It has been said that, once the six steps have been completed, the curriculum designers start again

with a needs evaluation to survey what changes are required (Cycle starts once more.).

7

2. The Namibian instruction is in a way based on the behavioral reasoning of Tyler. As h is

method of reasoning too highlighted a critical set of variables that we will weigh against

the questions he raised. According to (Wolfaardt, Curriculum development and practices,

2012) Tyler accepted that the structure of the school educational programs too had to be

responsive to three central components that speak to the most components of an educative

encounter. These are as takes after: the nature of the learner (formative component s, learner

interface and needs, life encounters, etc.); the values and points of society (democratizing

standards, values and demeanors); information of subject matter (what is accepted to be

commendable and usable information). Looking at the Namibian wid e curriculum, they

have started the curriculum policy “Education for all” which needs that we create another

way to think around our framework of instruction and preparing and how we organize it

(Kristensen, 2009) . From the “Go als for Namibian Essential Instruction (access, quality,

equity and democracy.” within the Namibian outline “school subject’s competencies”,

“Areas of Learning (such as science, social, commerce etc.)” and “Aims” are determined

based on the Tyler’s three c entral variables (Kristensen, 2009) . Thus, it can be concluded

that Tyler’s contribution to our Namibian curriculum is relevant.

3.

Current curriculum models can be broken down into two wide categories — the product

model and the process model (Stutt, 2018) .

? The product model is results -oriented. Grades are the prime objective, with the

center lying more on the wrapped up product instead of on the learning process.

? The process model , in any case, is more open -ended, and centers on how learning

creates over a period.

4. (Wolfaardt, Curriculum development and practices, 2012) discussed the learner centered

curriculum as follows:

? Learning ought to be upgraded which the learner should be dynamic within the

learning environment. Which actually mean learners must be highly /fully engaged

in what ever is being presented to them. E.g. (Flom, 2013) giving and let learners to

illuminate issues, assess prove, analyze contentions, produce hypotheses — all those

learning aptitudes fundamental to acing fabric within the teaching .

8

? Learning ought to be based on the on -going lives of the learners and center on their

interface and needs. E.g. the N amibian curriculum should focus on how learners

must cope themselves with any difficulties they will encounter in their live such as

the epide mic HIV/AIDS, poverty etc.

? Moreover, learning ought to center on the meaning that the substance and

encounters hav e for the learners, and the relationship between learning and feeling.

? The curriculum ought to too center on issues around liberation by making a

difference in learners to pick up mindfulness, competencies and states of mind that

will empower them to requi re control of their lives. E.g. the curriculum

emphasizing on how to do proper decisions about ones’ life, structuring awareness

about teenage pregnancy, HIV/AIDS etc.

? In this curriculum substance is critical within the sense that it should be based on

the wants and interface of the learner, that will offer assistance to them to create

the competencies and demeanors to liberate them from social treachery and it ought

to be significant to them

5. (Wolfaardt, Curriculum development and pr actices, 2012) listed and described the role

players in evaluation as follows;

? The learners ; as ought to be permitted to take part in their possess assessment,

ought to be empowered to do peer assessment, ought to learn how to reflect on their

claim learning and ought to gotten to be accomplices within the curriculum handle.

? The instructors ; as ought to offer assistance to create appraisal exercises for

learners ought to assess their claim execution as well as that of their colleagues.

They ought to be prepared to ended up intelligent of their possess hones, ought to

be included in agreeable curr iculum work, and ought to be mindful nearby others

for program assessment.

? Parents and the community ; as ought to not as it were be collectors of assessment

data, but be given the opportunity to take part in assessment assignments. They

ought to contribut e to all angles of educational modules counting assessment.

? The regional offices; because they are the “watch dogs’ of curriculum usage and

assessment in arrange to guarantee that assessment was done accurately at the level

and according to the syllabus, which it was reasonable and solid.

9

6. According to (Katjavivi, 2016) , the following are factors that have pressurized Namibians

to reform their education:

? Lack of teaching facilities

? The need for upgrading the skills of instructors in the vocational training program

? Inadequate pre -primary development

? Linguistic Diversity

? Poor Teaching Methodology

? Low Teacher Motivation and High Absenteeism

? Inadequate Teacher Qualification and Support

10

References

Eisner, E. W., & Vallance, E. (1974). Five conceptions of curriculum: Their roots and implications

for curriculum planning. In E. W. Eisner, & E. Vallance (Eds.), Conflicting Conceptions

of Curriculum (pp. 1 -18). Berkley, As cited in Wolfaardt 2012: PA: McCutchan

Publishing.

Engelbrecht, F. D. (2008). General Teaching Methodology. (W. de Waal, Ed.) Windhoek,

University of Namibia, Namibia: Centre for Open, Distance & eLearning.

Flom, J. (2013, June 3). Choice for learning. Choice for life . Retrieved from Q.E.D. Foundation:

-characteristics -of -learner -centered -teaching/

Kandjeo -Marenga, H. U. (2014). Teaching methods of Biology. Windhoek, University Of

Namibia, Namibia: Cent re for Open, Distance & eLearning.

Katjavivi, P. H. (2016). EDUCATIONAL TRANSFORMATION IN NAMIBIA. Forum of the

Commonwealth Council on Education (pp. 10 -12). Windhoek: Palierment of Republic Of

Namibia. Retrieved from

d/media/2016/speech_at_commonwealth_16.pdf

Kristensen, J. O. (2009). Reform and/or change? The Namibian. Windhoek, Teacher Educator and

Project Manager for the Life Science Project Ibis/MBEC, Namibia. Retrieved from

nload?doi=10.1.1.540.4785&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Ministry of Education, A. a. (2015). Aims. In Life Science Syllabus Grades 8 & 9 (pp. 1 -2).

Okahanja: National Institute for Educational Development (NIED). doi:ISBN: 978 – 99945

– 2 – 111 – 1

Olivia, S. O., & Ki rkland, R. (2012). Six -Step Approach to Curriculum Development. As cited in

Wolfaardt 2012 (Curriculum development and practices).

Stutt, A. (2018, October 25). Curriculum Development and The 3 Models Explained . Retrieved

from Top Hat Blog, New To Teaching : -development –

models -design/

11

Wolfaardt, D. (2012). Curriculum development and practices. (C. Villet, Ed.) Windhoek,

Materials Development and Instructional Design Department, Namibia: Centre for Open,

Distance & eLearning .

Wolfaardt, D. (2014). Assessment and Evaluation. Windhoek, University Of Namibia: Centre of

Open, Distance & eLearning.

Cite this page

Fillemon Johannes; 201602792; Curriculum Development. (2019, Dec 20). Retrieved from http://paperap.com/fillemon-johannes-201602792-curriculum-development-best-essay/

Let’s chat?  We're online 24/7