Early Adversity and Cortisol Regulation

Experiences during infancy and early childhood are believed to play a crucial and unique role in organizing children’s neurobiological development. Specifically, experiences within early attachment relationships are expected to assist with regulating the diurnal functioning of the hypothalamic-adrenocortical (HPA) axis (Koss, Hostinar, Donzella & Gunnar, 2014). The HPA axis is an important component of the neuroendocrine system and involves communication between the hypothalamus, anterior pituitary and adrenal cortex. When a person experiences stress, the HPA axis becomes activated and beings to excrete hormones and such as cortisol, in an effort to regulate important biological systems.

Cortisol therefore, becomes an important neurobiological marker of the body’s response to stress. Often, researchers struggle to identify specific predictors in dyregulated HPA functioning due to confounding variables such as genetic expression, sensitive caregiving and environmental stress.

Recently, adoption models have been used to disentangle many of these confounding variables. The present study utilizes an international adoption model which offers a powerful test of the unique effects of early experiences of adversity on cortisol, which is one element of neurobiological development.

As adopted children transition from institutional care into highly resourced families, predictor variables can be isolated and examined. In this way, this study has the potential to provide a deeper understanding into sensitive developmental periods and the neurobiological organization that occurs in infancy and early childhood and will examine whether the effects of early experiences of adversity during this time persist over time. With a deeper understanding of how early adversity impacts development, we can begin to intervene earlier in life and potentially influence and improve longer term mental health outcomes in vulnerable populations.

Get quality help now

WriterBelle

Verified

Proficient in: Adversity

4.7 (657)

“ Really polite, and a great writer! Task done as described and better, responded to all my questions promptly too! ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

There has been a recent surge of interest in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis among developmental researchers. The HPA axis is an important neuroendocrine system that controls reactions to stress and regulates several biological processes through the excretion of neurotransmitters and hormones such as cortisol. (Jacobson, 2014). Studies on early human development have suggested that early separations from caregivers are often associated with changes in the functioning of the HPA axis (Dozier, Peloso, Lewis, Laurenceau & Levine, 2008). HPA therefore becomes a powerful litmus test of stress and aversive experiences. The present study will use HPA changes to determine the impact of early experiences of adversity.

Stress is a condition caused by aversive experiences in which an individual experiences threats to physical or emotional well-being that overwhelm the body’s capacity to cope (Gunnar, Herrera, & Hostinar, 2009). When a body is overtaxed, the HPA axis becomes activated and cortisol is excreted. Cortisol regulation patters are often discussed in terms of the change in cortisol levels between wake time and bed time. This change or natural decline in cortisol throughout the day is called diurnal cortisol. In low-risk samples, cortisol levels are typically high after waking in the morning and low prior to bed time, which creates a steep downward slope from wake to bed time. While some experience with manageable stress prove to be important for healthy development, prolonged, uninterrupted and overwhelming stress can have dire effects on biological systems (Gunnar, Morison, Chisholm, and Schuder, 2001). When the HPA axis is overstimulated, the body is forced to process excessive amounts of cortisol which, over time, cause undue wear-and-tear on the body. This type of chronic stress is often associated with institutionalized care (Gunnar et al., 2001). Institutionalized care within orphanage settings in international countries has been shown to be particularly stressful to infants due to adverse conditions such as over population and limited adult-to-infant ratios (Gunnar et al., 2001). As a result, these children often experience poor quality caregiving, social neglect, which can thrust these children’s bodies into overwhelming and prolonged stress responses.

One of the most valuable ways to study the effects of early adversity on development is through the use of internationally adopted children. Adoption models offer a powerful test of the unique influence of early experiences of adversity for HPA functioning because children experience profound shifts in care giving experiences post adoption by entering highly resourced homes (Koss, Hostinar, Donzella, & Gunnar, 2014).

In a study conducted by Gunnar and colleagues (2001), higher cortisol levels over the daytime hours were found in populations of children adopted from Romanian orphanages. These inflated cortisol levels persisted six and a half years post adoption demonstrating the long-term effects early experiences of adversity can have on HPA functioning.

In another study, HPA axis functioning was examined in internationally adopted children, biologically reared children, and children adopted during their first year from overseas foster care (Koss et al., 2014). HPA functioning was examined in all three samples during the transition to family care in the first two years post adoption. This study analyzed four time points of diurnal HPA samples taken from each child participant. Researchers discovered that post-institutionalized children with lower social care quality prior to adoption exhibited less steep cortisol slopes. In addition, blunted diurnal cortisol levels were found to be a mediator between adoption status and increased behavioral problems two years post adoption. Taken together, research shows that children with early adverse experience demonstrate less strongly fluctuating levels of cortisol compared to low-risk samples of children with no early adverse experiences (Gunnar et al.2001).

Vegt, Ende, Kirschbaum, Verhulst, and Tiemeier(2009) conducted a longitudinal study of internationally adopted individuals who had experienced neglect and abuse early in life. The researchers found that these individuals had decreased waking cortisol levels, resulting in an altered diurnal cortisol slope . Thus, early experiences of adversity appear to have associations with cortisol levels and the diurnal slope, even when children are raised in another environment after their early maltreatment.

Amongst developmental researchers, it is commonly assumed that early experiences can have relatively long-term effects that do not fade with time (Raby, Roisman, Fraley, & Simpson, 2015). This “enduring effects model” could be used to describe the associations between early relational experiences and later outcomes. If the enduring effects model is applied to the present study, we could anticipate that the contributions of early adversity for internationally adopted children’s diurnal HPA outcomes should be relatively stable and persist across periods of development.

Conversely, the “revisionist model” predicts that the association between early experiences and later outcomes would become increasingly small over time, approaching zero as the temporal lag increases (Raby et al., 2015). If the “revisionist model” is applied to the present topic, the contributions of early adversity for internationally adopted children’s diurnal HPA outcomes should decrease as time progresses and resemble HPA patterns more typical of individuals who have no early aversive experiences.

There has been a plethora of research that has been conducted on young, internationally adopted children. Yet there is a paucity of longitudinal research addressing longer-term consequences of early experiences of adversity. There appears to be limited evidence about whether post-adoptive caregiving experiences can facilitate recovery in internationally adopted children’s diurnal cortisol outcomes or whether the effects of early adversity will persist despite substantial improvements in caregiving quality. The present study will seek to fill some of the gaps in prior research by examining the impact of early experiences of adversity on diurnal cortisol outcomes 4 years post adoption. This study is part of a larger longitudinal study conducted examining the significance of early experiences on development amongst samples of internationally adopted children.. For the purposes of this study, the cortisol outcomes of 78 internationally adopted children were examined at the age of 5 years.

Time spent in institutional care was used as a predictor of diurnal HPA functioning. Based on the Enduring Effects model of development (Raby et al., 2015), this study predicts HPA outcomes will remain blunted at the age of 5 years. The aim of the present study was to determine whether early experiences of adversity negatively impact internationally adopted children’s neurobiological development, as measured by the regulation of diurnal cortisol patterns over time. This study predicted HPA outcomes would remain blunted at the age of 5 years. Consistent with that prediction, the findings from this study indicate that longer time spent in institutional care prior to adoption is associated with lower cortisol levels in the morning and more blunted declines in cortisol levels throughout the day. These low waking cortisol results indicate that early experiences of severe adversity can disrupt the regulation of children’s cortisol regulation and the consequences can endure up to four years post adoption. These results thus support the Enduring Effects model of development and imply that early adversity may have lasting implications for neurobiological development (Raby et al., 2015). These findings therefore could inform the design of early interventions for both children and caregivers.

While many people may assume that less cortisol is good, lower waking cortisol levels are symptomatic of dysfunctional cortisol regulation pattern which can have detrimental impacts on physical health and cognitive functioning. Applying information gleaned from studies conducted by Shoal, GIancola and Kirillova (2003), blunted diurnal cortisol patterns appear to confer risk for later psychiatric disorders, most especially psychopathy and substance abuse. We can therefore infer that children experiencing extreme forms of early adversity, such as institutionalization, are at risk for developing psychopathology later in life. For example, blunted cortisol patterns are predictive of increases in aggressive behavior over time and characterize adolescent diagnoses such as conduct disorder and adults with antisocial personality disorder and substance use disorder, dependence, and addiction (van Goozen, Fairchild, Snoek, & Harold, 2007). Shirtcliff and colleagues (2009) have argued that HPA hypo-reactivity is central to the development of lack of empathy. The impaired neural circuitry of individuals with blunted or hyporeactive HPA systems leaves them under-aroused by the distress of others and thus vulnerable to behaving in indifferent ways (van Goozen, Fairchild, Snoek, & Harold, 2007). Although it is premature to suggest specific behavioral implications for the effects of children who experience early adversity, the findings are concerning.

One of the limitations of this study is the nature of the internationally adopted population. The extreme adverse environments these children faced prior to adoption makes it challenging to generalize these findings to other forms of less severe early experiences of adversity. Future research should use similar methodology with samples of domestic infant adoptions, which experiences far less adverse conditions prior to adoption, in order to get a clearer picture of how “typical” adversity in early childhood impacts HPA functioning longitudinally.

Another limitation for this study is the nature of saliva sampling. Saliva sampling is known to produce less accurate measures of physiological reactions to adversity when compared with more invasive measures such as the cosyntropin, tetracosactide, or Synacthen test (ACTH) or Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH). Unfortunately, these measurements are too invasive to be used with children (Gunnar, et al., 2009). Most researchers studying early adversity must rely on samples of cortisol obtained in saliva. Some of the issues that arise with the use of saliva samples include, time of day, child age, sleep/wake cycles, and social context. This study therefore, controlled for age, and time of day when samples were taken, and used diaries to assess external variables such as food, illness and medication in an effort to minimize measurement error. Even with the limitations of salivary samples, research on this neuroendocrine system has grown tremendously popular because of the ease of salivary cortisol measures.

Another critical challenge and possible limitation to the study is the complex and multifaceted nature of adversity in childhood. When researching stress and adversity, we must consider the type, severity, and duration of the adversity the child faces. Other factors such as the family and home environment, psychological mechanisms of coping and defense, individual differences in reactivity and developmental status of the child must be account for when examining the effects of early adversity (Gunnar et al., 2009). When studying internationally adopted populations, it is often impossible to accurately discern the nature of the adversity these adopted children experienced in early childhood. This study relies on parent reports of observed conditions within the care institutions and many parents did not directly observe the actual institution from which their child came. We therefore relied heavily on the amount of time spent in institutional care in order to get a clear measurement early adversity. To further control for unknown environmental variables, recruitment efforts focused on institutionalized care within regions with well-reported adverse conditions such as eastern Europe and Asia.

One final limitation of this study remains the inability to parse out the interaction of the environment with an individual’s unique genetic code to shape HPA functioning and brain development. Without biological samples from birth mothers, we have no way of accurately discerning what genetic factors influence HPA functioning and what is a product of the environment prior to adoption.

Future studies should look longitudinally beyond 4 years post adoption to see if diurnal cortisol outcomes remain dysregulated or if these outcomes fade over time. If these outcomes persist over time, future research can begin to look at different early interventions to regulate the HPA axis. Future research should also look at how HPA functioning may mediate effects of early adversity on executive function development. Executive function deficits often account for similar psychopathology found in HPA dysregulation and therefore may be an important predictor in psychopathology. If we can identify the specific neural networks and functioning responsible for psychopathology, early interventions can be developed and implemented to curve the trajectory of mental health issues.