Are We All Just Prisoners Watching The Shadows Dance

Human slavery is a retrogressive event that many people have condemned, the features of bondage continue to manifest even in contemporary life. Unlike traditional slavery which involved whipping and long unpaid work hours, modern daymodern-day modern-day slavery begins in the mind; restricting individuals to forge a single perspective on issues, instead of utilizing a multifaceted approach. Various examples demonstrate the level of mental slavery that incarcerates people and their actions to a single approach of life importance. ‘Are we all just prisoners watching the shadows dance?” is a phrase from Plato’s The Allegory of the Cave that shows how humans continually remain trapped in mental slavery? In the Allegory of the Cave Plato attempts to show how even though people are physically free, they remain prisoners of their own making, by embracing single-minded ideologies of life.

In an attempt to expound on the issue of mental bondage, this text will assess some of the societal norms and cultures that present aspects of modern-day slavery.

Society is a resultant feature of change (Wessels, 10). It is the small things that occur daily that create the point of reference when it comes to the determination of social values and vices. However, physical change cannot occur without a mental paradigm shift that dictates a new and improved way of doing things. Just like the people in the cave allegory that remain incarcerated yet look outside to the world of freedom, so is the modern society (Plato, 2). One of the most retrogressive and misleading ideologies to ever exist is the belief that education is the only way to succeed.

Get quality help now

Marrie pro writer

Verified

Proficient in: Modern Day Slavery

5 (204)

“ She followed all my directions. It was really easy to contact her and respond very fast as well. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Well, it is impossible to disapprove of the role of education in the shaping of people’s career lives. It is thanks to education that civilization became a reality. Instead of living in bushes and covering our bodies with leaves and animals’ skin like in the past, education gave us the correct tools to make clothes, which people wear today. Nonetheless, education is not the only key to success (Tracy 25). Various global figures continue to scale the heights of greatness even without having to go through the complete cycle of formal education. Ellen DeGeneres, Steve Jobs, David Geffen, Michael Dell, and Rachael Ray are just a small number of individuals that went on to succeed in life even without graduating from college. gets voters hope

Education is not the path but the bus that makes it easier for people to succeed in life (Tobak, 56). Therefore, there is no harm in letting children follow their hobbies and passions as part of their career journey. Just because a student decided to drop out from college to pursue their music passion does not make them a failure. Alternatively, just because an individual decided to venture into business with their tuition money does not make them irrelevant in life. It is agreeable that the end goal for all people is to lead a successful life. Therefore, whether people choose to use education, hobby, or even entrepreneurship as the bus that takes them to success should not be a big deal. The modern economic world offers individuals a myriad of employment and job opportunities, most of which fall outside the realm of formal education requirements. Most jobs in the technological, manufacturing, and art sectors do not require an educational background to enter. As such, it is high time that society, especially parents, opened up their minds to accept that although education is crucial in life, it is not the only road to success.

Modern-day politics are another aspect of self-bondage and incarceration. Many countries across the globe embrace democracy forcing them to engage in cyclical electioneering events aimed at choosing leaders for certain government offices of power. During elections, many voters hope that their elected leaders will cure their problems, most of which remain a functionality of any functioning government. However, immediately after elections, the leaders resort to self-gain tactics that only see them and their close friends and relatives get richer. Instead of fighting for the rights of those who elected them, the politicians hibernate into their cocoons only to come out in the following elections to ask for another term, moist of who Society.

Society and its people are its enemies. Years come and go and politicians change, yet the politics remain the same (Michler, 78). It is the same voters that replace the failed leaders with others even worse than those there before. Instead of becoming the change, we need to see in people’s society, people continue to lament and complain in silence without taking the initiative to implement the change itself. Politicians can only be as good as the society that puts them into power. Therefore, as much as people continue to complain and point accusing fingers at politicians and their politics, they should remember that they are a representation of the larger community. The only way to implement change in society is to stop playing the onlooker role and become a proactive participant in matters of social change.

The election of leaders to political seats is not the only way to achieve political stability. There are many countries across the globe that practice other forms of leadership that have proved to work for them. As such, if politics becomes too expensive for society to maintain, then opting for an alternative mode of leadership is also an option. It is the embrace of varied political perspectives and ideologies that makes a society ready for change, not just the mind but also the physical revolution.

For a long time, the older generation and critics of social media platforms saw the new revolution as a waste of time, especially for the young generation. During the initial introduction, social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and WhtasappWhatsapp were mainly seen as avenues for connecting and chatting with family and friends. As such, most parents and the general society faulted the sites for eroding the concept of traditional connections between people. Social media is a waste and Itof time a unilateral ideology that fails to consider the numerous benefits associated with the new communication channels. It is thanks to the large user numbers of social media sites that have seen a shift in not only advertising and marketing but also the expansion of the job market into online and virtual jobs. The wake of social media and its job creation has provided a new avenue that demonstrates that formal employment is not the only way to earn a living more and more youths are moving away from the formal sector in readiness to embrace the digital world the myriad of opportunities it offers. It is the same critics of social media platforms that have come back to use the sites not only to market their goods and services but also to use information captured by the sites to conduct research studies, most of which study consumers trends.

It is important to note that social media is the current negative biggest mover when it comes to modern economics, citing the numerous job opportunities it offers, coupled with other business initiatives. Those that were out looking into the realm of social media are now the ones struggling to create a niche in the same industry. The turn-around of the use and value of social media is proof that although there might be negative connotations to innovations and events, employing an all-rounded perspective to issues is always a more rewarding approach rather than pure criticism. I am correct to say that the economic values of social media stemmed from the positive criticism of individuals who sought to change the negative name of the innovation into a useful one.

Most countries, especially those that embrace democracy have a constitution that guides their citizens on what to and what not to do. There is a general misconception that it is only the constitution that can achieve law and order within a democracy. People do not stop to question whether a constitution is the only way to maintain law and order. Numerous individuals contend that the constitution is there to help keep up societal lawfulness. In any case, a portion of the rules stipulated in the constitution just go for hindering individuals’ opportunity opportunitiesyetopportunities yet additionally make it less demanding for advanced bosses and s, government officials, to rehearse their capacity. No proof demonstrates that the race of a solitary individual to speak to others in the congress, senate of parliament, is viable for the general public. A more critical take a gander at the constitution uncovers the numerous mystery statements that legislators use to stifle the opportunities of others to make themselves applicable.

First things first, most of the constitutions many democratic nations use were crafted decades ago, in meantime per day modern od that was different from the current reality. The drafters of the constitutions were not angels. As such, it was impossible to predict how life would change and whether or not their guidelines would apply to the modern world. Despite the existence of amendments to constitutionals acts and laws to make them relevant, the approach is a narrow-minded ideology that seeks to restrict people from indisciplined acting or behaving in a certain way, classified by the society as right. The use of a constitution to guide people is a self-declaration that humans are too uncouth and indisciplinindisciplinede to act in the right manner, and it is only a written document that can tame them. Although laws and guidelines are essential for societal harmony, it is also important to explore the possibility of a world without restrictiMostMostons. In fact, most of the crimes committed are memeremember relyrely because there was a restriction. People tend to want to do things more when they bare the tag, as illegal (Goldman, 124). As such, it is possible to say that the legalization of everything could be the solution to ending societal crime, hence is onno need for a constitution and laws to guide people.

From the text, it is evident that there is never one perspective on anything, not even the most important aspects of life. There is always a second, third, or even fourth way to look at the same issue. The rigid mind is usually self-installed bondage that forces people to live in slavery without even knowing it. itin The secret to a more fulfilling and free mind is the acceptance that two or three perspectives can result in the same goal. Just because something has been a norm for a long time does not make it indispensable. Change is there to replace the old with the new, hence societal change. Even though resistance may be a constant reminder when implementing change, sometimes it takes an alternate perspective to steer matters intoin the correct direction.