Speedy Trial Rights: Explanation & Solution

Explain the right to a speedy trial and the remedy for a violation of the right The United States criminal justice system has put in place crucial measures to ensure that defendants in criminal prosecution are protected to ensure a free, just and fair trial process The sixth amendment has effectively put in place crucial focus on five principles that aim at ensuring that that the rights of defendants are protected The right to speedy trial is one of the principles that have been effectively developed within the sixth amendment.

The United States Constitution provides a significant understanding on the right to a fait trail process for all its citizens regardless of their levels of impairments.

The underlying aspect in this case is to ensure that the defendants are accorded ajust and fair due process where important elements are put into consideration The rights at trial for every defendant are protected and thus there is significant need to focus on key elements, which provide a significant environment where there is need to ensure that there is better understanding of the key issues within the criminal procedure.

The sixth amendment clearly asserts that the defendants have a right to speedy triaL The time limits for a speedy trial is not effectively defined legally. The speedy trial therefore was significantly considered as a key factor in creating a better environment where a number of key advantages can be obtained. Speedy trial is therefore a right to every defendant and should be significantly treated fairly and speedilyi.

Get quality help now

Bella Hamilton

Verified

Proficient in: Common Law

5 (234)

“ Very organized ,I enjoyed and Loved every bit of our professional interaction ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

One of the key advantage of the speedy trail process is that it prevents inclusion of unverified evidence that might be crucial in determining a given case, The right to speedy trial however depends on the available evidence that can be effectively developed to create a better understanding where a given case can be effectively concluded. The violation of the right to a speedy trial depends on the underlying four factors, which must be effectively explained They include the length of delay, the reasons provided, prejudice because of the delay and whether the defendant asserted the right to speedy trial. A speedy trial targets at using the available evidence in ensuring thatjustice is served through a fair and just process.

The speedy trial ensures fast tracks the due process and thus reduces excess tension and anxiety that is suffered by the defendant since it is very clear that it creates a better focus where a defendant is able to understand and make an informed decision regarding the next step to make. The speedy trial process also plays a crucial role in ensuring that there is no damage to the case. A slow trial is likely to incorporate many issues, which are likely to deviate the case from its initial focus, which limits the delivery of a far court process. An important aspect within the due process is the delivery of a fair trial and thus the significant understanding on what a speedy trial entail has been a significant issue since there is the need to ensure that the due process is fully followed and justice delivered. The investigations need to be effectively done in order to ensure that there is enough evidence to ensure that the court processes is successful.

Therefore, the consideration of the speedy trial process incorporates a number of key issues, which need to be considered since the overall objective of the trial process is to ensure that justice is served. Even though the delivery of speedy trial must be put into consideration, it is important to understand that the process needs to be done effectively following all the constraints of the law. The right of speedy trial is violated under certain circumstances especially when the length and reason of continuance is reviewed and considered unjust The continuance of the case therefore is significantly considered as not violating the right to speedy trial when there is significant reason as to why the case is taking too long, An important aspect considered in this case would if the evidence present is not enough to sustain the case.