Established by the trainer (this can be determined by widely available VAK questionnaires), the development action can be tailored to match this. If the training is being delivered to a group of learners who may have different preferred learning styles (e.g. web-based e-learning or group training), all three style should be incorporated to ensure that all learners can engage with the material at some stage during the learning process.
Reflecting on my personal learning style, I tend to fall into the visual and kinaesthetic categories.
I learn best by watching a colleague complete a task first and then attempt the task myself to gain the practical experience.
An alternative to the VAK approach of analysing learning styles is the Honey and Mumford approach. This approach separates learners into 4 categories; Pragmatists (those that can see a link to their own work and can recognise the advantages of this learning), Activists (those that prefer team working, interaction, discussions, problem-solving), Reflectors (those that prefer observation, producing reports and essays with time to think about what they have encountered) and Theorists (those who like to apply theories to problems, using concepts, models and facts).
Again, these learning styles can be established via online questionnaires.
When organisations/employers are deciding upon development actions, they are likely to consider how much time it will take employees away from their productive work, as it is important that the training does not have a negative impact on the operation of the organisation. The budget for training should also be taken into consideration – if there are a large number of employees to be trained, it is likely to be much more cost-effective to explore whether the training can be delivered on site to save on expenses such as travel and accommodation.
Finally, when ascertaining the suitability of different types of development actions, consideration should be taken as to whether they are relevant to the goals and objectives of the organisation (e.g. is it a worthwhile and appropriate investment?). Relevant training and development should improve the quality and efficiency of service provision, and allow the organisation to flourish in a competitive market.
Identify current and future likely skills, knowledge and experience needs using skills gap analysis
A skills gap analysis is a method of determining the knowledge and skills and required for a particular role or team, and then comparing an individual’s or team’s current knowledge and skills to the requirement. Once the skills gap analysis is complete, a plan can be created to address the gaps in skills and knowledge.
To perform a skills analysis on myself, I have chosen to use the SWOT tool.
The Current Position Strengths Weaknesses
The Future Opportunities Threats
The development required in relation to opportunities and threats
Explain how to set Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Time-bound (SMART) objectives
When developing a personal and professional development plan, it is important that individuals set themselves or the team learning objectives. Learning objectives describe the knowledge and skills that individuals will be able to demonstrate once they have taken part in the learning process.
In order for the learning objectives to be effective, they must be considered in some detail, and a popular tool to achieve this is the SMART method.
The SMART method can be broken down as follows in relation to setting learning objectives:
Alternative Approaches to Learning Styles. (2022, Apr 24). Retrieved from https://paperap.com/alternative-approaches-to-learning-styles/