The Role of the Concept of Nature Versus Nurture in Criminal Behavior

Whether a person is a criminal due to nature or nurture remains a controversial battles With dangerous increases in criminals spread across the world, debates around this topic have become all the more significant and valued, However, a person’s genetic composition has a major effect on one’s behavior. A person may be brought up in a wonderful environment, have outstanding parents, supportive friends, desired family, but ultimately become a criminal This goes to show the environment does not catalyze criminal behavior, People born from their parents have traits passed down that lead to the creation of their own, unique personalities These traits cannot be altered and are important to identifying who a person is, Developments in life, do not decide whether one is destined to be a criminal, but the genes that create, define, and make up a human being fundamentally determine sot Hickock, a primary example from Source B had an enviable childhoodt Blessed with a wonderful school life being an outstanding athlete in a variety of sports, star player, and a good student with.

A marks all over seemed destined for success Despite such a wonderful life, l-lickock was born with criminal tendencies and went on to become one.

Even with many positives in life, Hickock could not escape from his destiny. People born with such tendencies may also use their upbringing as a cover up. As seen in source C, the criminal uses his upbringing as a trial tactic in attempt to escape his sentence. Blaming criminal behavior on one’s upbringing is only providing criminals with reasons to justify their actions Furthermore, even if nurture were a reason for criminal conduct, it is up to the person themselves to let it control and destroy them or not, The nurture theory suggests that criminals are often brought up in horrible conditions.

Get quality help now
Doctor Jennifer

Proficient in: Nature Vs Nurture

5 (893)

“ Thank you so much for accepting my assignment the night before it was due. I look forward to working with you moving forward ”

+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

However, evidence from Source A and B shows otherwise, Hickock born with complete opposite conditions is shown to still have criminal tendencies and behaviors despite an excellent childhood.

As shown, even if the environment did play a role in criminal behavior, in the end genetics have a much bigger impact. Capone from source E, a man from a respectable, professional family, had well educated parents and older siblings. Evidently Capone wasn’t poor, but even though he did not have dreamed living conditions, he had a lively family who gave off the feel of normal citizens. His conditions were far from horrible, more close to ideal, butjust like Hickock, Capone became a criminal. Even with guidance from an terrific family, Capone lead the life of a criminal with his siblings eventually becoming the number one public enemy. Genetics inherited from parents play a huge part in one’s fate. Criminal tendencies and behaviors ultimately don’t derive from terrible environmental conditions.

Even if one didn‘t desire to become a criminal, ultimately their genetics would lead them to become one, All over the world, people are using the excuse of the environment affecting and causing their actions to escape capital punishment. Despite common claims, criminals inherently have unorthodox and violent behavior regardless of rich or poor backgrounds. Without a doubt, nature, the genetics that make, explain, and create a person play a significant role in whether a person is to be a criminal or not. Changes I plan on making Remove unnecessary parts Improve sentence structure Add another paragraph Include more direct quotations and integrations Provide more context.

Cite this page

The Role of the Concept of Nature Versus Nurture in Criminal Behavior. (2022, Jul 14). Retrieved from

Let’s chat?  We're online 24/7