The Black Masculinity Essay

What is an cultural group? An cultural group is a human population whose members identify with each other. normally on the footing of a presumed common family tree or lineage. These cultural groups are normally united by shared cultural values. common Fieldss of communicating. or spiritual patterns. So possibly the theory of Black maleness can be considered an cultural group. There is the obvious factors of being ‘Black’ and ‘male’ that connects these members in this group; they have skin colour and gender in common.

Possibly this cultural group has come together to be more so merely a group who have race and gender in common. It goes beyond that and Black maleness has members who are non ‘Black’. Possibly this inquiries if history. lineage. and family tree are factored in when going a members of a group. But will these members be genuinely accepted in the cult of Black maleness. Within the dominant civilization African American work forces have developed their ain sense of individuality.

These work forces have integrated themselves into American society making a civilization of their ain.

They have established a linguistic communication. a sense of frock. and behaviours. These protocols help this group of work forces emphasize their ethnicity and gender. Members of this group who follow these traits are considered to be portion of the cult of Black maleness. What is go oning is that white work forces. because of the influence of dad civilization. are pervading the boundaries of the Black masculine cult. This is an experience of somewhat rearward assimilation.

Get quality help now

Marrie pro writer

Verified

Proficient in: Civilization

5 (204)

“ She followed all my directions. It was really easy to contact her and respond very fast as well. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

At first it was the assimilation of the Black adult male into the white man’s universe and now it is as if functions are reversed.

How the white work forces see the Black maleness portrayed through the media and want to be portion of it. Anthropologist Fredrik Barth specifies three conditions under which cultural groups develop and define themselves: ( a ) a dominant civilization is present with the power to keep conditions whereby other groups of people. ( B ) are stereotyped. and ( degree Celsius ) are constrained to certain functions that function complementarily in the general civilization. Barth argues that cultural differentiations are born out of struggle.

The above conditions are necessary for the care of cultural differentiations. So. the care of cultural diverseness requires domination by one group of the remainder. Using Barth’s definition of what an cultural group is and which boundaries are defined by these regulations this paper will turn out how Black maleness conforms to these guidelines set uping them as an cultural group within the dominant civilization. This paper will besides research the difference that is expressed by black males in American civilization through the usage of linguistic communication frock and behaviour.

The cult of Black maleness will turn out that cultural groups can make something of their ain while contriving a new civilization in which they can partake in and be control of. Black Masculinity “A peculiar type of black masculinity–one defined chiefly by an urban aesthetic. a nihilistic attitude. and an aggressive posturing–has made its manner into the cultural mainstream in the last two decennaries. ” There are many lending factors but the image of Black maleness has come about due to the popularisation of hip-hop civilization and the prominence of blame music and the “videomercials” that sell it.

More specifically. it is the consequence of the popularity of the urban “gangsta” and his incarnation in the “gangsta” blame of creative persons such as Dr. Dre. Ice Cube. Snoop Doggy Dogg. and Tupak Shakur. Black maleness is the effort for black males to integrate what the dominant civilization believes to be masculine. Most surveies have nevertheless regarded Black Masculinity as an option to societal position. instead than as an extension of it.

‘Black Macho’ has been portrayed. hence. as differing in sort instead than degree from the wider gendered power dealingss within Society at large… It is nevertheless; merely within the context of wider power dealingss — and as an extension of them –that Black maleness can be to the full understood… Black maleness is so possibly best understood as an articulated response to structural inequality. enacting and overthrowing dominant definitions of power and control. instead so replacing for them. Rather than a hostile and recluse entity [ black maleness ] can be seen as a base for interaction and dialogue with wider society.

These work forces have taken an thought which already exists harmonizing to society and incorporated what they believe is their definition of maleness. This look of maleness. harmonizing to Mercer and Julien: “subjectively incorporates properties associated with dominant definitions of manhood – such as being tough. in control. independent – in order to recover some grade of power or active influence over nonsubjective conditions of impotence created by racism. ” Black maleness embraces the stereotyped function of what a Black adult male typically resembles. What the dominant civilization portrays: the tough cat. more organic structure so head.

This is received as negative because they are non accomplishing what the ideal is. what “Whiteness” is. So would this group of work forces be considered an cultural group within the American society? Harmonizing to Barth an cultural group embodies the followers: “Largely biologically self-perpetuating. portions cardinal cultural values. realized in open integrity in cultural signifiers. makes up a field of communicating and interaction. has a rank which identifies itself. and is identified by others. as representing a class distinguishable from other classs of the same order. ”

Those who choose to conform to these norms of this group will reject or know apart against others and this leads to the inclusion of this specific group. Behavior How one behaves will find what group they will suit into. These behaviours include how one dresses. Acts of the Apostless and negotiations. Black maleness has their ain sense of frock. actions and even linguistic communication. Depicted through the media the Black masculine male will dress “gangster”. There stereotypic baggie denims and large jerseies with the jewellery and baseball caps. This reinforces the hyper-sexualized stereotypic male in society.

Recently. Richard G. Major’s construct of the “cool pose” has proved an insightful term for understanding the kineticss of black maleness as it has developed in response to unequal conditions in the modern urban environment. In a series of closely related plants ( listed at the terminal of this essay ). Major leagues argues that black males have accepted the traditional values of maleness but are so restricted by societal and political factors that many of them have been profoundly frustrated by their inability to ordain these traditional masculine functions.

“In brief. ” Majors explains. “cool pose originated as a header mechanism for the ‘invisibility. ’ defeat. favoritism. and educational and employment unfairnesss faced by Black males. In response to these obstructions. many of these persons have channeled their originative endowments and energies into the building of masculine symbols and into the usage of conspicuous gestural behaviours ( e. g.. demeanours. gestures. vesture. hairdos. walks. stances and handshakings ) ”.

Major leagues includes in his illustrations of the cool airs such diverse behaviours as the usage of wit. feigned emotional withdrawal. and specific stylistic looks like the black athlete’s imaginative hoops dunking. football spiking. and stop zone dancing. every bit good as black musical performers’ aggressive sitting and graceful yet strenuous dance manners. A premier ingredient of the cool airs as a compensatory signifier of maleness is an overdone manner of stamina: “Symbolic shows of toughness support his individuality and addition him respect; they can besides advance chumminess and solidarity among black males”.

Unfortunately. as Majors is careful to indicate out. the ritualized hyper maleness performed by many black work forces as a cool airs. peculiarly the preoccupation with ordaining a tough character is rife with the negative potency to advance unsafe life styles ( e. g.. pack bangers. tough cats. drug traders. street streetwalkers. and procurers ) and to reenforce harmful stereotypes. These images illuminate the figure of the endangering Black male.

He embodies images of the black heterosexual rapper. jock. and film star which challenge the racialist word pictures of black maleness as incompetent. highly-sexed and rude. in the terminal a menace to middle category impressions of muliebrity. household and state. Possibly with these incarnations this is why Black maleness is its ain cultural group. They were unable to absorb into the dominant civilization because they were seen as a hyper sexualized menace to white adult females. This left these work forces to make something of their ain. through frock. linguistic communication and action.

This group uses linguistic communication as another look of societal difference. African American Vernacular English is the linguistic communication that is used to pass on. it is besides known as Black English. Black Vernacular. or Black English Vernacular. Black English is besides known as African american vernacular englishs. a combination of “ebony” and “phonics”. this linguistic communication is spoken by many Blacks in the United States and around the universe. Black maleness has accepted African american vernacular englishs as their linguistic communication because it is something that is alone to the African American civilization.

The job with this signifier of communicating is that it is non widely accepted within the dominant society. The kids who are raised by work forces who are portion of this cult of Black maleness are told to talk otherwise because the signifier of communicating that they have learned is non acceptable. This is a miscommunication and some parties tried to acquire Ebonics recognized as a linguistic communication and to be taught in the school systems. This jurisprudence was non passed but it was interpreted and they are now learning the kids how to interpret African American Vernacular English into American Standard English.

Jackson sees linguistic communication as “badges and emblems of individuality can be seen as a sort of message. the successful transmittal. response. and decryption of which necessary to the interaction is taking topographic point. ” This is why Black maleness is every bit strong as it is because it embraces their ain linguistic communication and through this they are able to keep relationships with others in this group of work forces. Such as the word “Nigga”. if this word were used by person exterior of this cultural group so they would be considered racialist but through music and usage within the group it is considered to be a term used to place each other.

It would be seen as uneven if person who did non embody Black maleness started talking in African American Vernacular English because they may non hold the lineage which allows them to incarnate Black Masculinity and their linguistic communication. Boundaries To organize a cultural boundary it is presumed that the boundary lines would be between different fatherlands. ethnicities. faiths or linguistic communication groups. In the instance of Black maleness the bulk are situated all over North America and the remainder of the universe.

With such a diverse spread it would be difficult to put physical boundary lines on this group. “Ethnic groups are non simply or needfully based on the business of sole districts; and the different ways in which they are maintained. non merely by once-and-for-all enlisting but by continual look and validation…” In stating this. those who partake in the cult of Black maleness erect boundary lines through communicating such as linguistic communication and organic structure linguistic communication. Those who do non react to these actions are non considered to be portion Black male society.

There is certain protocol which will be followed within the group and if this is non followed so there is the designation of an foreigner who is seeking to interrupt through the boundary lines. The job with Black maleness and the exclusivity of this civilization is that it is widely available in pop civilization. It would be easy for person who is non portion of this cultural group to analyze the mass media and larn the traits which define Black maleness. Black maleness is based on attribution how people identify their civilization and how they identify themselves within this civilization. Their boundaries are socially constructed.

Cultural groups portion common civilization which includes shared faith. linguistic communication. manner of frock. lodging. shared imposts; attitudes. beliefs and most have the same perceptual experience of a common yesteryear. As discussed earlier this group embraces a shared common civilization which separates them from the dominant civilization. They have created themselves due to a peculiar historical circumstance and in this instance it is colonisation and the invasion of the White adult male. The individuality of Black maleness is reliant on how persons embrace it. constrained by it; act on it and through this Black maleness will hold a separate individuality as an cultural group.

To divide themselves they have must be able to separate them from the dominant civilization by “creating visual aspect of cultural discontinuity”. Black maleness has done this by presuming functions such as the mobster rapper. the black jock or film star. By making these individualities they are building a boundary between “us” and “them”. Overtime groups tend to go culturally more homogeneous. This endangers the boundary and makes it harder to keep but in order to continue its distinguishable individuality these boundaries need to be maintained by the group.

Boundary care serves to insulate the group from alternate value systems ( harmonizing to which its members may happen themselves ranked otherwise ). preserves the group’s bing internal power construction. and provides a possible beginning of political power for the group through solidarity and Numberss. Black maleness is a strong force in the media and to follow what their cultural beliefs are would be easy. They have familiarized their civilization with the dominant civilization leting anyone to be able to take part in their beliefs. This weakens their boundary lines and makes it harder to keep a fastness at their boundary lines.

The lone thing that would non be broken within Black maleness is in the name. To be a true portion of this cultural group one would hold to be a Black male. This is the lone thing that will keep true to keep the boundary lines of Black maleness. Biologically Self Perpetuating Black maleness has become such a widely known phenomenon and even those who do non portion the same lineage seem to be able to incarnate traits of this group. Traditionally an cultural group would portion a common background and family.

Through the usage of mass media the cult of the Black male has become extremely sexualized and those who see this machismo want to be portion of it. Cultural groups are chiefly endogamic and this new assimilation into their group will do jobs with this. This is a job because it takes off from the power of what this group stands for and what they embody as the butch adult male. “In a societal order where white beliefs signifier cardinal accounts of how persons should ordain their color-sex places and associated function outlooks. black males do non. regardless of their economic position or rational capablenesss. have the cultural privilege to take the enterprise.

” This quotation mark redefines that there is a dominant civilization and leting assimilation this group is leting the power to be taken off. As these work forces are portrayed as hyper sexualized in the media it introduces them to something that the dominant civilization positions as the ideal. this goes back to colonisation and the privation of what the White adult male has. the unachievable. “A major ground for the initial brush was the mystique attached to the hitherto unavailable ‘the white goddess’ ”. This “white goddess”. the unavailable. is the difference between the dominant civilization and the Black Masculinity.

Black work forces move between bulk and minority civilizations and must negociate the racism and favoritism that accompany caste-like minority position. Frazier suggests that Black maleness and male function individuality must be viewed in these changing societal and cultural contexts. Specifically. Black work forces are expected to conform to dominant gender function outlooks ( e. g.. to be successful. competitory. aggressive ). every bit good as meeting culturally specific demands ( e. g.. cooperation. publicity of group. and endurance of group ) of the Black community.

“certain patriarchal values such as physical strength. sexual art and being in control as a agency of endurance against the repressive and violent system of subordination to which they were subjected”. The dehumanising facet of this myth. a myth that Mercer claims many black work forces do non desire demystified because it in some ways ( e. g.. strength. sexual art ) raises them above the position of white work forces. is that. while an accent on the organic structure as beastly force is a marker of the difference between male and female. it is besides a cardinal symbol in the division between nature and civilization.

Possibly this is why Black maleness came to be. It is argued that the members of the Black Power motion defined the political relations of race within “metaphoric of phallic power. ” which developed out of male activists’ desires to counter cultural articulations of black male lower status. and that this is readily seen in the Hagiographas of influential figures such as Malcolm X. Huey Newton. Eldridge Clever. and Amiri Baraka. Wiegman farther claims that the phallocentric position was besides articulated through the macho. hyper masculine characters looking in the blaxploitation movies of the early 1970s.

It is through Wiegman’s phallic theories about Black males that this cultural group created the term and civilization of Black maleness. Conclusion Through Barth this paper has been able to discourse the boundaries which the cultural group Black maleness was able to command. They were able to make their ain cultural group in response to the dominant civilization. They defined themselves through being Black males. They embodied what it meant to be. They did this by frock and action.

This is late obvious through the media and ‘gangta’ blame and possibly with this incarnation they are able to turn out that they are able to be as a powerful force within the dominant civilization. Black maleness members are able to hold their ain sense of linguistic communication whether it be verbal. Ebonics. of physical. “cool pose”. This is how they established members of the group and were able to pass on with each other by these agencies. They reinforced that the “cool pose” shows stamina and it additions him respect and from this it promotes solidarity within the group of Black males.

The “cool pose” is non ever a good thing. In the media the dominant society does non see the jock but the mobster and the stereotype which is created by the dominant civilization. They are seen as a menace and to maintain them safe Black maleness was created in an effort to make values and regulations of their ain in order to obtain position in a dominant civilization. To maintain this group sole these Black work forces created a linguistic communication of their ain and through this they communicate and they are able to keep a strong bond through these agencies of communicating.

Through the usage of linguistic communication they create boundary lines. The boundary lines which they created let them to keep who they are without being assimilated into the dominant civilization. They have embraced and emphasized who they are and what they stand for. To protect this they erected boundary lines such as similar dress/style. linguistic communication. sense of history and shared imposts. These facets are alone to them but as popular civilization embraced these facets such as linguistic communication and dress the boundary lines began to interrupt.

One thing that the dominant civilization could non interrupt is their gender and race. They were African American work forces and no affair what the dominant civilization did to seek and absorb them they had this to observe. This is of import to keep the strength of your boundary lines. Black maleness is a group of Black males who have been able to continue that they are portion of an cultural group and they have history which needs to be respected. They are seeking to prolong a civilization that is easy being integrated into the dominant civilization.

If this group follows what Barth has laid out in order to keep boundaries so Black maleness will be able to be whomever they want within the dominant civilization. REFERENCES Alexander. C. The Art of Being Black. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1996. Barths. F. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. Christiania: Universitesforlaget. 1969. Frazier. E. Franklin. The Negro Family in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1939. Gray. H. “He Is a “Bad Mother*S % @ ! # ” : Shaft and Contemporary Black Masculinity. American Quarterly. Vol. 50. No. 2. 1998. Gray. H.

Cultural Politics. A Particular Section: Black Masculinity and Ocular Culture. Callaloo. Vol. 18. No. 2. ( Spring. 1995 ). Jackson. J. Language Identity of The Colombian Vaupes Indians. In Baumand. R.. Sherzer. J.. Exploration in the Ethnography of Speaking: Surveies in the Socialand Cultural Foundations of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1989. Major leagues. R.. & A; Bilson. J. M. Cool Pose. New York: Lexington. 1989. Mercer. K. Welcome to the Jungle: New Positions in Black Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge. 1994. Mercer. K. & A; Julien. I.

Race. Sexual Politics and Black Masculinity: A Dossier. London: Lawerence & A; Wishart. 1998. Smith. A. D. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell. 1987. Staples. R. Black Masculinity: The Black Male’s Role in American Society. San Francisco: The Black Scholar Press. 1982. Wiegman. R. Feminism. ‘The Boyz’ and Other Matters Sing the Male: Screening the Male: Exploring Malenesss in Hollywood Cinema. London: Routledge. 1993. Wilikinson. D. Y. Expectations and Salience in White Female – African Male Self-Other Role Definitions. Chicago: Nelson-Hall. 1977.