Music Piracy and Copyright Laws Stir Controversy

Music piracy has caused quite a stir with copyright infringement laws in recent months. A current article I found talks about a recent issue within this topic. The main issue is consumers digital writes. It was published in the San Francisco Chronicle by Benny Evangelista. A group of entrepreneurs have proposed a law to protect consumers and allow them to copy CDs, use a MP3 player, and watch DVD movies on their computer. These three areas are the major pirated areas of digital products.

The government is currently trying to crack down on these three areas and make it so it is not possible to do them on any computer. These entrepreneurs feel this is wrong and want to protect the consumers rights. They argue that not all people that own a computer are going to be piraters. They state All consumers are not potential criminals. The entrepreneurs have proposed a Consumer Technology Bill of Rights that says the following things should still be okay for consumer to does rights. They argue potential criminals. The entrala still be okay for corecord tv shows to watch later, copy songs from CDs to a portable device, make backup copies of content, and translate content into different formats. The concern that the government has is the rights listed about can be taken advantage of.

This article is defiantly coming from one side of the topic. The side it is arguing is the consumer side. This side contains both innocent and guilty parties which includes the people that are taking advantage of digital technology; pirates.

Get quality help now

writer-Charlotte

Verified

Proficient in: Music

4.7 (348)

“ Amazing as always, gave her a week to finish a big assignment and came through way ahead of time. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

The other side is the artists and corporate businesses that want to protect their product. Without this proposal all consumers would be labels as piraters when just a certain percentage actually are.

The writer for this article is a reporter for the San Francisco Chronicle. His primary role is to inform the public about current issues. He specifically want to write about issues that impact the people of the San Francisco area. One can tell that the writer is coming from a consumer standpoint. All of the facts that he reports on is supporting the proposed law to protect consumers digital rights. The writer has a dull tone in the article. This is the basic approach when writing a informative piece of writing. The writer, Benny Evangelista is a general writer. He has the credentials to write an informative piece of writing but he is probably not the best writer for the issue. A better writer would be one that is involved and submerged in the whole topic of music piracy. Someone that comes from more than one angle would have a bigger impact on the reader. If they informed the reader of all the sides of the issue, the reader could take it for what it is and decide for themselves what they think about it.

The writer is responding to a big issue and most people do not realize that this issue affects them. A lot of people these days download music off of the internet and listen to it for their own personal enjoyment. But they did not pay for it. Before this huge internet piracy thing the only way to listen to music was to by CDs or tapes. Now people are getting this music for free and not realizing that it is violating copyright laws. Music piracy is a big issue now and many people are more informed on the issue. They must make a moral decision whether to continue downloading this music without paying the artist are album companies is right. Benny Evangelista is informing the public further about the issue so people can make this decision with further information to base it on.