Problem of Accessibility of Water in Philippines

In 1993 the Board of the World Bank endorsed a Water Resources Management Policy Paper (WRMPP). In that paper, and in this Strategy, water resources management comprises the institutional framework (legal, regulatory and organizational roles), management instruments (regulatory and financial), and the development, maintenance and operation of infrastructure (including water storage structures and conveyance, wastewater treatment, and watershed protection). The 1993 Policy Paper reflected the broad global consensus that was forged during the Rio Earth Summit of 1992. This consensus stated that modern water resources management should be based on three fundamental principles (known as the Dublin Principles).

First is the ecological principle which argues that independent management of water by different water-using sectors is not appropriate, that the river basin should be the unit of analysis that land and water need to be managed together and that much greater attention needs to be paid to the environment. Second is the institutional principle, which argues that water resources management is best done when all stakeholders participate, including the state, the private sector and civil society; that women need to be included; and that resource management should respect the principle of subsidiarity, with actions taken at the lowest appropriate level.

Third is the instrument principle, which argues that water is a scarce resource and that greater use needs to be made of incentives and economic principles in improving allocation and enhancing quality. (Bank 2004)

This study investigates the determinants of household buying decisions to purchase bottled water or purified water from refilling stations among households in Metro Cebu, Philippines.

Get quality help now

Proficient in: Water

4.7 (657)

“ Really polite, and a great writer! Task done as described and better, responded to all my questions promptly too! ”

+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

A survey of 360 households was conducted to obtain data on household sources of drinking water, household bottled water buying behavior and perceptions of water quality. A binary profit model was used to examine the effects of socio economic and perception based variables on the likelihood that a household regularly bought bottled or purified water. Results show that households that perceived their primary source of water, whether from the tap or from other sources, to be unsafe were more likely to buy bottled or purified water. Education of household heads, the presence of children ages 0–5 years, household size and price were also found to have significant effects. Income, however, was not found to have influenced the decision to buy. Having piped access to the local water district and knowledge of government assurances about water safety were also not found to have a significant impact.(Francisco 2014)

Some economic studies have already been done that reviewed or analyzed the potable water scenario within the Philippines. in an exceedingly study of water demand and provide in railway line Manila, Ebarvia (1994) explicit that the majority of the surface water resources in railway line Manila were already contaminated which for these to be appropriate drinking, tertiary water treatment was needed. The Globe Bank Cluster (2003) additional indicated that up to fifty eight of the groundwater offer within the country supposed were drinking are contaminated with coliform and required treatment. It additional declared that thirty one of diseases monitored throughout a five-year amount were water-related diseases. Eight in another study on demand and provide of water in railway line Manila, David and Inocencio (1996) indicated that thirty of the population wasn’t reached by any public water service. What is more, it argued that the standard of water service was poor, liableness of service was inadequate and therefore the progressive rate obligatory by the service supplier didn’t extremely profit the poor.

On the problem of water valuation, Largo et al. (1998) declared that each the worth of water and financial gain of households considerably affected water demand by households in railway line Cebu. However, worth had a larger impact than financial gain on water demand. This instructed that the high worth paid by the poor for water instead of their low financial gain mostly explains their low levels of water consumption. Additionally on water valuation in railway line Manila and railway line Cebu, David et al. (2000) instructed, among others, the adoption of a valuation policy that covers the complete economic price of urban water together with its monetary price of water production and distribution, cost of water wherever there are competitive users and value of externalities or negative environmental impacts. Arellano (1994) emphasized the severe strain on water resources that the growing population of railway line Manila has brought and explored choices for privatization of the Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) that served the water desires of the realm. In another study on the consequences of the privatization of the railway line Manila Water and Sewerage System (MWSS on the worth of water, the poor and therefore the setting David (2000) indicated that unless some changes were created, the water shortage drawback in railway line Manila can persist even with privatization. It additionally declared that the poor can still pay a way higher worth for water. What is more, the paper argued that while the water valuation is progressive, it’s going to find yourself having regressive effects because the poorer households should depend upon shared water association or public taps and thereby truly pay higher water costs.

In another study, Inocencio et al. (1999) studied the fundamental manage water demand to take care of physiological state and correct sanitation and computed the lifeline or minimum consumption block of regarding ten three-dimensional meters per month for a family of half dozen members. Inocencio and David (2001) additional indicated that the supply of water for the poor and poor communities may be a potent tool for assuaging impoverishment because it impacts on health, financial gain and consumption and gender and social inclusion. They additionally argued that during this sense public private-community Partnerships (PPCPs) that are delivering water to the poor in railway line Manila is also tributary to impoverishment alleviation. On establishments, WSP (2004) instructed that rural installation comes with vital investments in capability and establishment building created the foremost property rural installation. It additional argued that the involvement of the government and communities aids the preparation, planning, implementation, and management of such systems. The study additionally instructed that the success of comes would require strengthening native capability and building establishments to control and maintain systems, developing mechanisms for price recovery, expressly targeting the wants of the poor, and providing additional incentives for native investment.

Another institutional study by Singh (2006) instructed that policy manufacturers within the Philippines ought to provide due attention to institutional transformation or the creation of applicable and new establishments because the country moves towards decentralization. On different potable water sources, Magtibay (2004) explained that a little of the population of the Philippines has shifted their preference to different sources of drinkable which the demand at the water replacement stations or water stores that sell pure water is currently increasing. It declared that the standard of pure water conforms to national nine standards for drinkable and is even higher than the standard of water created by ancient installation systems notably in terms of removed impurities. On the problem of accessibility of potable water, Greenpeace (2007) and World Bank (2005) explicit that one out of 5 Filipinos didn’t get water from formal sources. What is more, it explained that solely seventy seven of the agricultural population and ninety of these in urban areas have access to an improved water supply and solely forty four have direct house connections. Madrazo (2002) additional mentioned that those while not house connections solely access water from wells, springs, communal taps, and/or from small-scale informal suppliers. On the problem of finance water comes within the Philippines, Johnson et al. (1996) explored innovative ways in which to finance water districts notably in reference to its monetary donors. Finally, on the problem of meeting development goals, ADB (2006) projected that the Philippines can have rural installation for less than seventy seven of the agricultural population by 2015 that is off-track achieve MDG targets. ADB (2007) additional aforementioned that for the Philippines in 2004, overall installation coverage achieved was solely eighty five (87% urban and eighty two rural), with overall sanitation coverage of seventy two (80% urban and fifty nine rural). It declared so that progress on meeting MDG targets must be improved.

Cite this page

Problem of Accessibility of Water in Philippines. (2022, May 16). Retrieved from

Let’s chat?  We're online 24/7