Principles and Implications of Scientific Management

The beginning of twentieth century saw important developments in engineering that allowed, for the first clip, mass industry of merchandises. At the same clip big corporations were established necessitating a important work force. The inflow of European immigrants coupled with the migration of the rural public to urban parts made up a work force that was preponderantly uneducated and unskilled.

Consequently, directing such an unskilled work force resulted in inefficient and unproductive administrations. Scientific direction, which involves changing and simplifying the manner undertakings are performed in order to maximize labour productiveness, was implemented as a solution to these organizational jobs.

For many, nevertheless, the thoughts of scientific direction are thought to be irrelevant to our extremely technological advanced society, and hence, it is a direction manner that is no longer required in the twenty-first century. Conversely, it has been argued that the rules of scientific direction can still be seen adapted and implemented in assorted sectors of concern in this current twenty-four hours and age (Wilson, 1995; Jones, 1997 ), and therefore directors must still be cognizant of such a direction manner.

Consequently, extent to which directors in the twenty-first century still necessitate to be cognizant of the rules and deductions of scientific direction will be discussed.

Frederick Winslow Taylor, in 1911, published “The Principles of Scientific Management” , which explained that using the scientific direction method to concerns could notably better worker productiveness. Prior to the coming of scientific direction, undertakings were carried out by specialized skilled workingmans who may hold undertaken drawn-out apprenticeships. As a consequence, determinations about how undertakings were carried out in their specific field were made by them ( Rule of Thumb ).

Get quality help now
Bella Hamilton

Proficient in: Economy

5 (234)

“ Very organized ,I enjoyed and Loved every bit of our professional interaction ”

+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

Scientific direction removed such liberty and replaced it with interrupting down skilled techniques into a series of unsophisticated undertakings that even the unskilled employee could be trained to execute.

  1. In response to these clear inefficiencies in industrial patterns, Taylor ‘s scientific direction was based on certain rules that were to be achieved in order to increase labour productiveness, they included:
  2. Replacing the old Rule of Thumb system with proved scientifically studied work methods, thereby increasing efficiency.
  3. Scientific choice and preparation of every worker to make standardized repetitive undertakings ( deskilling ) as opposed to go forthing them to develop themselves. Therefore, ensuing in improved productiveness and quality of the manufactured goods due to task repeat.
  4. Ensure that the scientifically developed methods are followed by monitoring and collaborating with workers
  5. Work is to be divided equally between workers and directors, hence, directors plan scientific direction rules are applied to be aftering the work by directors, but workers are the 1s that carry out the undertakings. This non merely causes a division of labor but exerts the control of the director over the workers.

The above mentioned rules were introduced and implemented in assorted corporations ensuing in increased productiveness. One such illustration was when Taylor was employed to better work methods at the Bethlehem Iron Company in 1898. Until so each hog Fe animal trainer, on norm, were lading 12.5 metric tons of blast furnaces merchandise per twenty-four hours. By carry oning scientific experiments associating to the optimum times for raising and resting, Taylor was able to better burden by hog Fe animal trainers to 47.5 metric tons per twenty-four hours, raising productiveness fourfold and increasing workers rewards by 60 % as a motivational inducement.

As a consequence up to $ 80,000 nest eggs were achieved per annum. Furthermore, this attack involved the employees taking orders and thereby giving up their manner of making the occupation and replacing it with Taylors methods ( Kanigel, 1997, p 214 ), one of the first illustrations of alining the marks of the workers with those of the directors. It was besides during this period that Taylor noted that money is a primary motivation factor and so workers ought to be paid excess in conformity to their end product and given fillips for making or transcending marks.

The thoughts of Taylor ‘s scientific survey were developed farther by Gilbreth, an applied scientist and director like Taylor. While Taylor focused his attending on clip Gilbreth focused on the gestures of undertakings. In his experiments Gilbreth ‘s used cameras to gaining control and analyze the gestures of bricklayers. Thereafter, by redesigning and doing the motions of workers to be more efficient he was able to increase end product from 120 to 350 bricks per hr.

Henry Ford was another person who adapted the rules of scientific direction to fabricating Ford vehicles. Prior to the execution of scientific direction, skilled craftsmen were required to bring forth the vehicles ensuing in batch production of Fords. Henry Ford, nevertheless, mechanised the undertakings by presenting a individual intent machine to bring forth standardized parts. Furthermore, Ford took the complicated undertakings of fabrication vehicles and divide them into much simpler standardised undertakings that made up an assembly line. Fordism non merely eliminated the demand of skilled workers, but allowed for the efficient mass production of goods.

With the publication of Taylors work on scientific direction, a century ago, the inquiry needs to be asked as to why is this direction manner still relevant even today? The reply may hold to make with fact that, if followed right, Taylorism can significantly impact productiveness and efficiency of a corporation, factors that are still of import in the twenty-first century.

One of the chief illustrations of scientific direction in usage in the twenty-first century is McDonalds, a fast nutrient eating house concern that has spread worldwide. Aspects of Fordist, Taylorism and Gillbreth direction manners can be observed in McDonalds. Ritzers Mcdonaldization, a thesis derived from Braverman, looks at how the work forces in these eating houses have been deskilled, and hence, undertakings have been simplified. The meat is foremost grilled harmonizing to detailed and precise instructions, followed by the add-on of boodle and sauces etc, thereby making an efficient production line with persons holding a peculiar function in the production of a McDonalds repast.

Furthermore, extra facets of the standardised service such as cooking times, drink dispensers and pre-programmed hard currency registries non merely restrict the clip to finish such undertakings but prevent discretion or creativeness, by the worker, that would be counterproductive to rules of scientific direction of efficiency and control etc. Evidence of Gilbreths thoughts are besides present here as the layout of McDonalds kitchens place all equipment, nutrient etc at the fingertips of employees hence avoiding unneeded actions ( gestures ) such as to the other terminal of eating house to roll up an point. Therefore, such direction techniques which guarantee efficiency and productiveness play an of import function in Mcdonalds that others have argued have led to Mcdonalds going the largest eating house concatenation in the universe (Peters and Waterman 1982, p. 173-174).

In the same kernel of McDonaldi zation, supermarkets are a farther illustration of the adaptation of scientific direction in the twenty-first century. There is a clear division of labor with employees with peculiar functions such as stacking shelves, managing questions and scanning merchandises at the hard currency registry.

Call Centres are another illustration of where facets of scientific direction can still be observed. This was chiefly apparent from surveies conducted in 2004, which found that the design and operation of call Centres were in line with Taylorism. Name Centres were mostly supervised including the clip taken per call, whether an appropriate and efficient service was given every bit good as in many instances the advice given being scripted. Furthermore, many of the operators were trained to cover with merely specific facets of questions which they were assigned harmonizing to a old accomplishment set appraisal.

Understating costs was besides a cardinal issue in preparation, as with the high staff turnover it was of import to box cognition in order to let workers to be decently trained every bit shortly as possible. Such methods are in conformity with the rules of Taylorism of replacing the regulation of pollex and scientifically choosing and developing persons. Name Centres were besides found to follow the pay system of Taylorism where wage is relative to the degree of end product, as employees were given a basic pay with committee if they managed a sale and with fillips given if day-to-day or hebdomadal marks were met.

The Television broadcast medium industry is another illustration of the usage of scientific direction in the twenty-first century. Surveies carried out by McKinley and Quinn ( 1999 ) looked at the alterations in the Television broadcast medium due to technological promotions in the 1980s. Programme doing equipment, until so, was undependable and delicate, necessitating changeless monitoring every bit good as skilled operators. Therefore, merely experienced workers maintained and operated the equipment such as cameras. Thereafter, with the production of advanced and dependable equipment, such as point and shoot cameras diminished the demand for extremely skilled operators ( deskilling ) . As a consequence, low skilled workers could be comparatively easy trained to run such equipment.

Car fabrication in the twentieth century brought about the Fordist attack, nevertheless, the thoughts of this direction manner are still present in the twenty-first century. Assorted auto companies are now utilizing machines to fabricate vehicles, but alternatively of holding a individual machine they have used many automatons that each have a specialised undertaking in an assembly line. Consequently, despite important promotions in engineering scientific direction is still relevant in our modern age.

In many parts of the universe scientific direction is still present and is implemented as a direction manner such as in Bangladeshi sweatshops, steel mills in China or industry of athletic wear in Vietnam. In any instance it is evident that in these developing states Taylorism still has a function to play in this twenty-four hours and age in order to maximize productiveness while keeping criterions of efficiency.

Despite the illustrations given showing that scientific direction is still applicable in the twenty-first century, there are a figure of unfavorable judgments of this scientific method which besides contribute to the grounds why scientific direction is non as relevant in the twenty-first century.

One of the primary unfavorable judgments of scientific direction is that its mechanised attack to undertakings, handling workers as machines, is inhumane. This mechanisation is the consequence of deskilling the work force, nowadays in a figure of instances such as in McDonalds, ensuing in small occupation satisfaction and de-motivated employees due to the repeat of the undertakings. This impression is supported by Herzberg and Maslow ( REF ) who province that two factors influence workers, Hygiene ( e.g wage & A; position ) and Motivator ( e.g publicity ), which lead to satisfied and motivated workers. Such thoughts oppose Taylorism, which states that workers are motivated chiefly by money.

In our modern twenty-four hours and age workers are now more ambitious purposes in the workplace every bit good as holding a better apprehension of their rights as an employee. Consequently, employees non merely desire to be a more valued member of the organisation but besides have the chance of publicity within the concern. However, scientific direction does n’t let such possibilities, as it ignores the personal demands of the workers and focal points on efficiency and productiveness. Likewise, another job with scientific direction is that it pays no attending to the psychological and societal demands of workers. As many workers are no longer merely driven by fiscal wagess entirely but by other wagess such as occupation satisfaction, acknowledgment and position (Herzberg).

Scientific direction causes workers to go extremely specialized, thereby impacting their ability to accommodate to new functions and fortunes, hence impeding their flexibleness, a extremely valued property in the twenty-first century. Furthermore, this inflexibleness may hold effects on the concern itself, as to stay competitory in the modern economic system concerns must be able to accommodate to alterations in the market. Such alterations in the concern may be resisted by the specialized work force.

One of the chief obstructions of modern-day scientific direction is that of worker opposition characterized by trade brotherhoods. This obstruction, nevertheless, was besides demonstrated during the initial execution of Taylorism, as labour brotherhoods feared that corrupt employers may utilize Taylor ‘s piece rate system to drive rewards down, which did happen on some degree in 1915. In any instance, due to the low skilled undertakings of scientific direction employment bargaining power is retained entirely by the employer, which may take to workers being underpaid and mistreated.

Likewise, rules of efficiency and productiveness that dive Taylorism come with hard working conditions. In such fortunes workers have the power to hold trade brotherhoods represent themselves in order to better wages, benefits, working conditions etc. As a consequence, scientific direction in the twenty-first century is capable to authorization of such administrations that it is hard to implement to the full to any concern.

In decision, it is evident that some facets of scientific direction are still relevant and are being implemented in the twenty-first century. The advantages of this direction manner in standardizing undertakings and concentrating of productiveness have resulted in assorted industries using the scientific methods. At the same clip, jobs associated with intervention of the employees have lead to Taylorism being mostly absent from the bulk of corporations in the West.

Furthermore, the coming of the modern sophisticated employees to whom money is non the most important incentive coupled with the strength of trade brotherhoods have farther removed scientific direction from modern-day administrations. Therefore, scientific direction theory as a whole is non employed in modern corporations, but instead, facets of it are still discernible in certain concerns, therefore, a direction manner that modern-day directors still need to be cognizant of.

Cite this page

Principles and Implications of Scientific Management. (2017, Aug 13). Retrieved from

Principles and Implications of Scientific Management
Let’s chat?  We're online 24/7