Explanation: “The primary criticism to the structural-functional approach to religion is that it overlooks religions dysfunctions. For instance, religion can be used to justify terrorism and violence”, (Juergensmeyer, 2000).“Religion has often been the justification of and motivation for war. In one sense, this still fits the structural-functional approach as it provides social cohesion among members of one party in a conflict (e.g. the social cohesion among members of a terrorist group is high), but in a broader sense, religion is obviously resulting in conflict, not the resolution of such,” (Wikibooks)ReferencesJuergensmeyer, Mark (2000).
Terror in the Mind of God.University of California Press. ISBN 0520240111Wikibooks:
According to the process of social construction of reality, each individual in the society creatively shape their reality according to their own subjective interpretation of their interaction experiences. In this aspect, people tend to give their own meaning to their experiences and this meaning greatly influence how they respond to their given situation.
Consider encounters such as flirting for example, in this situation that individual that is given the compliment can either interpret the situation as a friendly and casual comment making their interaction purely platonic or professional.On the other hand, he or she can also interpret this situation as something romantic if he or she will designate meaningful motives to the actions of the other individual. Thus, how the person will react or respond to a flirting encounter depends largely on how he or she will interpret the situation and what meaning that individual will give to the experience.