We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Hobbes Vs Locke Essay Paper

Words: 361, Paragraphs: 5, Pages: 2

Paper type: Essay , Subject: Medicine

Locke had a theory of natural law and natural right; he believed that a rational purpose to government did exist. Defending the government as an institution, Locke insisted that not only did a good government care for the well-being of its public and have a basis for enforcing obligations on the citizens of its country; but, also, that a government was necessary for public welfare. Locke maintained that all human beings were equal and free to enjoy their inalienable right of pursuing life, health, liberty, and possessions.

To Locke, natural justice would always exist, whether a government did or not, it was just his belief that a government might better guard natural justice. Locke also defended the concept of popular sovereignty and the idea that rebellion is acceptable when the government stops protecting the natural rights that it was originally established to protect. So, Locke’s idea of an effective government was one that would maintain order among the people and provide protection and resolution when ones natural rights were broken.

Hobbes Vs Locke Essay

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on Hobbes Vs Locke Essay
Just from $13,9/Page

Get Essay

The exact opposite of Locke’s theory was Hobbes’, whose stated that if people had a choice between living under a government or living without one, they would choose the state with a government. According to Hobbes, this is because an individual is better off in a state where only the government can legally exercise aggression; which then allows the individual to focus on serving his and his family’s wants, and to satisfy the needs of the state that would allow it to maintain a good government.

So, it was Hobbes’ view that it was unnatural for man to put himself under the control of others – to have a government- but that it was rational to do so. Hobbes preferred monarchy mainly because he believed there should be only one supreme source of authority. He could tolerate parliament alone, but not a system in which government power is shared. This is the exact antithesis to the views of Locke. So, Hobbes’ thesis, although it was opposite from Locke’s, had the same ideas of maintaining order and providing protection and resolution when the rights of the people were threatened.

About the author

This sample is done by Scarlett with a major in Economics at Northwestern University. All the content of this paper reflects her knowledge and her perspective on Hobbes Vs Locke Essay and should not be considered as the only possible point of view or way of presenting the arguments.

Check out more papers by Scarlett:

How to cite this page

Choose cite format:

Hobbes Vs Locke Essay. (2019, Dec 05). Retrieved from https://paperap.com/paper-on-comparative-analysis-on-locke-and-hobbes-theory/

Is Your Deadline Too Short?
Let Professionals Help You

Get Help

Our customer support team is available Monday-Friday 9am-5pm EST. If you contact us after hours, we'll get back to you in 24 hours or less.

By clicking "Send Message", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
No results found for “ image
Try Our service

Hi, I am Colleen from Paperap.

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Click to learn more https://goo.gl/CYf83b