Essay-Hinduism and Buddhism The idea of Religare or binding oneself back to one s religion is key to many religions. In Christianity, we bind ourselves back to the truth unveiled through scripture, myths, tradition, and the church s teachings. Hinduism, however, has a much different interpretation of the idea of binding oneself back. There is not a whom or what that I can put my finger on. We all came from one God and we must get back to God. But how can one go about doing that?
A Hindu would say to free ourselves from the desires and illusions present here on Earth.
To free ourselves from material possessions and pleasures would be to obtain Moksha. Moksha, for Hindus, would be the point of freedom and the attachment to Brahman. In a way, this is extremely ironic, for, in the act of binding oneself back, a Hindu would obtain liberation. To me, these terms seem directly contradictory, however, this is proof of the fact that our minds cannot understand certain aspects of religion, and that we are limited.
The goal of a Hindu is to release themselves, but also to gain a complete understanding of life. By doing this, they are freed from the continuous cycle of reincarnation. There are, as Huston Smith tells us, four paths to the goal. The yogas are the specific direction taken to unleash the human potential of Moksha. The goal of the yogas is to come into and remain in touch with Brahman. The first way to God is through knowledge.
The three steps taken on this path are learning, thinking, and the third, a little more complex, consists of separating one s material ego from one s Atman. The second way to God is through love. The love we show to others can be translated into a love for God. The third path to God is through work. Through devotion to one s work, God can be seen through the highest rewards if done so wisely. The final Hindu path to God is through Psychophysical Exercises. In this way, Hindus experiment with mental exercises and observe their effects. Not all Hindus take the same path to God, but the goal is identical.
The Buddha made many reforms to the path to God. Well, not so much a reform as perhaps an alternate route. He called this the Middle Path. A way between sensuality and asceticism, the Middle Path lay through intelligence. The main revolutionary idea behind the Buddha s teachings was that he rejected asceticism, which at that time had been a popular belief and a socially approved route to salvation. Not only did he reject self-denial, but the worship of gods. In his renowned Eightfold Path, there is never any mention of worship. Also, he refuted the idea that one had to pass through countless rebirths to reach the Brahmin caste before being able to obtain salvation. For this very reason, Buddhism ultimately failed in India, because of the widespread control by the Brahmins. The most challenging concept for the Hindus to accept was that the Buddha taught that the soul did not exist. Hindus thought that the Atman, or soul, was God. The Buddha reasoned that if the soul is purely God, then it is not individual and therefore is an An-Atma or no soul. The achievement of liberation then for Buddhists takes form in Nirvana. Nirvana occurs when people release their yearning for false selfhood, which is similar to Hinduism. Paradoxically, as with Hinduism, the act of extinguishing this yearning occurs simultaneously with enlightenment. Studying Hinduism and Buddhism has been surely enlightenment for me. To my amazement, Hinduism addresses a few questions I have had before. I’ve wondered about the way life is connected and how life is a flowing circle of life and death. Hinduism has based primarily on the idea of Brahman and that everything is one. The idea that material positions are meaningless is something that I dread to think about because I am most certainly a victim of ttoday’ssociety based on wealth and power. It infuriates me to think that my possessions are meaningless, but for some reason, I am drawn to these teachings of Hinduism.
The majority of teachings of all the religions we have studied so far have made sense to me, and this is the most puzzling conclusion I am faced with. What does this mean? I have found something here and I am utterly confused. How the heck can more than one religion make sense to me? It is almost as though I could draw parts from different religions and form something new and rounded. This of course is a ludicrous idea, for thousands of years of traditions stand in my way. I just wish there would be some way to wipe the slate clean and rework the idea of God is a complete universal sense. I sometimes tend to view our ancestors and traditions to be inhibiting us from reaching some far-off realization that no Buddha or Brahmin or anyone has ever obtained. In Conclusion, I do wish to continue studying religions beyond high school maybe it will lead me to some discoveries.