Racism is the main problem facing Islam today. Muslims are gradually reducing racism around the world. This topic is related to the topic “Current social, moral and political problems” of Muslims and their solutions in the light of Islamic teachings.
Muslims face this problem in most of the world in different countries such as India, Europe, America, etc. Thousands of Muslims have been killed in India, women are being persecuted and raped by Indian soldiers, and now they are also facing a curfew for the last 91 days.
Now the world is speechless. The Indian state rejects Article 35, which has the power to challenge Kashmir and increase the number of troops in Kashmir. The Indian state is sending thousands of soldiers to Kashmir to kill people in Kashmir.
Geographic regions have faced this over the past seventy years. Also faces this disadvantage, which is that Israel force the Palestinians of the Palestinians. Every Jewish and Muslim Arab date their land claims thousands of thousands of years ago.
this political conflict began in the early twentieth century. Jews. The Arabs resisted, considering this land theirs.
The UN’s partnering early attempt to offer every cluster of land is failing, and Israel and the surrounding Arab countries have great wars over territory. Today’s cues are largely the same as two of these wars, one fought in 1948 and the other in 1967. The recent incident in Newzland is a good example of racism. They were scientists, engineers and accountants.
Some of them were born in New Zealand, while others fled back to the Pacific Islands, fleeing conflict or seeking a stronger life.
Many died trying to protect others, in line with relationships.
New Zealand officials began to get excited about the number of names of fifty Muslim believers UN agency, which was shot by an assistant aggressor on a weekday in 2 mosques in the metropolis.
Some of those named were natives of New Zealand, while others were from Asians, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, India, and Egypt. They committed this incident in that they committed this incident. In the days when the country installed toban clothing (also Triticum aestivum spelta burkha and burka) following deadly serial bombings that killed more than 250 people on April 21, dialogue on a similar ban is gaining momentum in India. Sen’s Knife, which is an ally in the care of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has demanded a ban on the dress – the dress worn by Muslim girls. “People wearing masks or clothing can pose a threat to national security,” said Sen’s knife, mentioned above in Samna, his mouthpiece.
Although Seine’s knife call did not resonate with the BJP, it previously said the demand had caused an inappropriate issue, the issue sparked headlines. however, this may not be the first time India has requested a ban on clothing (or burqa).
Two BJP candidates in the province recently stated that opposition parties wore victimization veils and asked people (including men) to fake votes against the BJP.
In 2010, France banned Muslim girls from wearing any clothing that covers their face and head. In the 2018 organization, the worldwide Human Rights Committee (UNHRC) presented that France’s binding ban on clothing and alternative veils could be a violation of human rights.
However, similar demand usually rises in countries such as the UK and Australia. Regular reports of Muslim girls about their clothes are also rumored in several countries, especially in the West.
All over the world, people are divided over the ban on the wearing of clothing (alternatively Triticum aestivum spelta as a burqa and burka) and alternative veils that cover the face. while opponents of the ban decision she combined in nursing, its supporters use examples of cases where women units of measure use dress against choice.
In addition, proponents of the ban argue that terrorists use these clothes (and various veils), including to carry out terrorist attacks. The ban on clothing dialogue should be used by political groups to complement their unconditional interests, promoting bias in one aspect and raising the “Islam in Danger” card in another.
Before we have the tendency to travel across countries to discuss which clothing and various veils are banned, it could also briefly explain here the veils that Muslim women wear, and therefore the methods they are all completely different from. each one.
This garment could also be the garment of Muslim women, which covered the entire body, including the face and head. Clothing usually has a mesh that allows the person to check what is going on. it is a loose dress that is very much designed, making it difficult to recognize the shape of a woman’s body.
However, the same demand usually grows in countries like the UK and Australia. Regular reports that Muslim women go about their clothes come, first of all, in many countries, mainly in the West.
All over the world, units of the area of people were divided due to the ban on clothing (alternatively spelled from soft wheat as clothing and burha) and various veils that cover the face. The one woman makes the women wear the dress of their choice.
At times the life and life of the militants. Malcolm believed that Christianity and Judaism lacked the revolutionary rigor to reform social institutions. He had had negative experiences with white Christian Yankees and had a history of using the Afro-Asiatic curse2 to justify enslavement of Africans, and this undoubtedly shaped his views. The binarity of Jewish-non-Jewish Judaism did not appeal to him either.
For Muslims, Malcolm’s writings spawned an otherwise fragile blueprint for an interracial or postracial Ummah (international Muslim community), a story that raised the profiles of Muslim-majority Arab and alternative societies in the Middle East that he visited. A truth that challenges that very story challenges the evoked color blindness of Muslim societies.
Decades before Malcolm, another twentieth-century image reformer, came to a similar conclusion regarding Islam: Gandhi felt that Islam, compared to Hinduism, had a transparent and absolutist vision of human brotherhood.
An excellent contribution of Islam to the national culture of India is its pure belief in the indistinguishability of God and the use of the reality of the brotherhood of people for those who conditionally live in their ranks. I am addressing these 2 distinctive contributions. For in Hinduism, the spirit of brotherhood has become overly philosophical. Likewise, while philosophical Hinduism has no alternative god other than God, it cannot be denied that intelligent Hinduism is thus not nearly as unshakable as Islam. The words of Gandhi and Malcolm may inspire pride in Muslims in their days, but the lack of a vital appreciation of race among Muslim history such pride will fuel Muslim exceptionalism, or at least mislead broad statements about several color-blind Muslim history. Nonetheless, measured research will show the United States the power of Islam to tackle the vexing issues of racism and racial superiority.
The conclusion is that everywhere in the world, Muslims are confronted with racism, and Muslims do not seem to be united, so the square measure of the world harms the Muslim. We are supposed to want a Muslim to unite, every Muslim leader – inform the world that we do not appear to be terrorists and stop racism in the United States.