We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

“Why lie to the history books” Review Paper

Words: 728, Paragraphs: 1, Pages: 3

Paper type: Review , Subject: Book Reviews

Essay on “Why lie to the history books”

It seems that you do not is aware that is socialism, not to mention how to write frantically about Semenov, saying, “ignorant stupidity” – well, well, well … actually funny! – about the author of “Economic ethnology” (a link to the electric version Here’s a list of his scientific works -.? Not ashamed?) – a man for the first time disclosed the full range of existing and existing forms of exploitation of man by man (and a half dozen – note can immediately call at least half a dozen?). No, I am far from simple links to authorities and is ready to do without them. But … there is the view that, at least, deserve close attention. And you … it’s not just lack of tact, it is immediately obvious, and bad faith, but – excuse me Your will return – and a real nonsense. And now, in fact. Socialism is not determined by the “combination of features” – remember how Hattabych old man was trying to create a phone booth in the image and likeness – but “somehow” did not work. So it is with definitions – they should work! The meaning and essence of socialism, precisely on the classics, Marx, including socialist ideas, ranging from the 19th century, first of all, the implementation of the principle of social justice (and this is the most current Western idea until now, the center of speculation and lies all the authorities and ideologies), which in the language of the economic theory of socialism – a classless society, that is, one in which the means of production are owned by society, not the state. That’s about it and lied, and lying Stalinist propaganda (and it is clear why – the death of his reeks of such a theory, or rather, with the subsequent dying off = falling asleep all the state functions assumed by the Company’s control, in the language of orthodoxy – the dictatorship of the proletariat – remember Lenin’s opinion ” about it “? Forgot?). Therefore impossible demagoguery about the socialist state – of this nature can not be (in ME and Lenin). State – is politarnaya forms of private property, including people, reaching to the slaves in the Gulag (this is just a scientific truth from the 20th century). Corporate Ownership nomenclature is precisely private property in accordance with its definition. Semenov wrote about the socialist principle of distribution “according to work”, as an economist, as a researcher and expert on pre-class and early class economies (though it is something to take the sense and think that it is not likely, but is something you do not understand …). What is behind it – quite clearly – the impossibility of class relations, including politarizma – this is where the bureaucracy robs the people and fattening, portraying servants of the people, under the guise lied about the “public property”, humanism and justice. And you wonder inserted – “on demand”, but by the way, this principle has already proved its necessity and effectiveness of one of the existing types of economic relations – in the primitive state. Stalinist state works because liberally lubricated with blood, but the current level of production and technology completely eliminates this shovels mode of production, hence the vital need to destroy a huge parasitic superstructure over society, called the state. “Socialism immediately on the planet will not work”, – who told you? In general, how do you ponabrali all this confusion about socialism, the impossibility of historical science, truth, etc. Stalinist blyagi? Just trouble, I must say. And remember, you have a large inflated – and this is in the best case. And in my opinion, the destruction of the global class relations between the two countries is possible only once and everywhere, and hence it is clear that capitalism and politarizm – two sides of the same coin and the fate they will have a common – a quick death, either with mankind or separately – if the latest “smart enough”. And yet to me the most lovely of the covenants of Stalin’s contemporaries, “an honest man to kill Stalin” – he wrote with his blood on the walls of the chamber shortly before the death of Artur Artuzov, I hope you know who this is? If not – would highly recommend steeper any fiction.

About the author

This sample paper is done by Joseph, whose major is Psychology at Arizona State University. All the content of this work is his research and thoughts on “Why lie to the history books” Review and can be used only as a source of ideas for a similar topic.

Here are other papers written by Joseph:

How to cite this page

Choose cite format:

“Why lie to the history books” Review. (2019, Sep 28). Retrieved from https://paperap.com/paper-on-why-lie-to-the-history-books-book-review-34/

Is Your Deadline Too Short?
Let Professionals Help You

Get Help

Our customer support team is available Monday-Friday 9am-5pm EST. If you contact us after hours, we'll get back to you in 24 hours or less.

By clicking "Send Message", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We'll occasionally send you account related and promo emails.
No results found for “ image
Try Our service

Hi, I am Colleen from Paperap.

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Click to learn more https://goo.gl/CYf83b