This sample essay on History Of Organizational Communication provides important aspects of the issue and arguments for and against as well as the needed facts. Read on this essay’s introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion.
History of the Field Reflection Paper| What is organizational communication? As a field organizational communication studies exactly what it sounds like the communication in organization. Defining the particulars of this often comes down to the researcher and the perspective that skew their opinions on the field. These subtle differences are why it takes Papa, Daniels and Spiker almost 16 pages to express their definition of their field of study. The organizational experiences of an individual have a huge influence on the individual’s opinion and definition.
Despite this all communication that involves two or more members of an organization constitutes organizational communication. It does not have to pertain to the organization, but can be to build a relationship. To actually develop a short definition for organizational let alone organizational communication. There is no way to box this field because of the changes that has occurred over its short life and the wide expanses that it covers. However, it is essential as a future professional in an organization to create this personal philosophy and refine it often.
For me this class and article has changed my view on the definition of organizational communication. For the past several years I have defined the term as communication within a business, but now I see that it encompasses a large majority of the communication that occurs. The influence of organizations has increased to a point that it defines our culture. It has done this to a point that our local, national and global communities could be defined as an organization. However, analyzing the influence of small scale interpersonal communication on the “global organization” is not feasible.
Organizational Communication Essay
Because of this the study of organizations is focused mostly on the members that have a direct and significant influence on an organization they are involved with. This ranges from CEO’s, managers, employees and customers. The communication between the groups and within each group is going to vary greatly, and it also depends on the role that each individual is in. With the near limitless communication possibilities in organizations makes it fascinating to look at how the communication facilitates the development of community in an organization Even by limiting organizational communication to this smaller sect of the globe it still accounts for almost all communication that an individual participates in outside of the family and relationships. As the article details that before leaving the house the influence organizations have on individuals is huge. This also goes further because a large part of the interaction in an organization is between peers both inside and outside of the physical container of the organization.
Since the development organizational communication the changes in perspectives has changed rapidly and drastically. With this change the area of study has also shifted. The traditional perspective was trying to use communication as a tool on their machine to slim down and increase their profits. Since then the view has changed to how communication works and how it can affect social issues within an organizations. As a field the widening the base of study is essential to the growth of the field and organizations. Defining organizational communication is an adventure into communication and all of its intricacies.
The field is as flexible as the organizations it both creates and portrays, but also relates to other fields of study in communication and other social sciences. True understanding of organizations and the communication within will only come through the study of current perspectives and keeping an open mind to new organization types. What is the value of studying organizational communication? Through studying organizational communication we look at the daily communication of almost every individual in the modern world. If we do not study this integral part of our lives we would be missing out on a huge part of human communication.
Being able to analyze different aspects of communication further builds our understanding of our own interests. Organizational communication integrates a variety of communication sub sects making analysis much easier. Organizational communication gives an interesting perspective on other areas of communication as well. The stresses that occur in the workplace drive communication to be a success of failure. This mixed with the wide variety characters in the organizational melting pot it gives researchers a chance to look at interracial, nterpersonal and group communication on a regular basis that otherwise would be much harder to look at. Also studying organizational communication gives companies and individuals to improve their communication and the efficiency of their business. Without communication nothing in an organization can be accomplished. Through studying organizations and then applying the results an organization can improve its profits with little cost and time. Individuals who study any communication let alone organizational communication have a huge advantage in organizational life.
This is the biggest reason that I chose to study organizational communication is to give me a greater understanding of how communication works both in everyday life, but also in the professional world. As with any other young and growing field if you do not study its past you have no chance to make it. The personal and professional benefits of studying this field are amazing. With the global change from small family businesses to large global organizations it is necessary to stay current with the trends of all aspects of the organizations that are taking over the world.
What two or three specific bits of information did you find most surprising, interesting, or valuable and why? The most valuable part of this article, and even this assignment was to develop a better understanding of the field that I am studying. When I first started in this minor I never had a good understanding of the organizational part of organizational communication. Through this article there has been a development of understanding, and a new ability to apply the information I have studied for the last three years.
Every time I hear or read about how young the field of organizational communication is its really astounding how much it has grown. Even with the substantial amount of research drawn on from other fields the rate of growth detracts nothing from the acceptance throughout the organizational community. Being in a communication program it is required that I say that communication is the basis of everything. Having some of the most powerful people in the world acknowledge this young field makes it a lot easier to justify this point of view.
The interpretive perspective brings organizations to a level of abstraction that really shows the importance of communication. The construction of reality through communication has been intriguing to me since it was mentioned in one of my early communication classes. With the interaction between members of an organization there is no way for it to be anything less than the sum of its parts. The judgment of the parts and the sum is as subjective as the example of the five dollar bill. These three parts of the chapter pulled at me strongly because they bring out the uniqueness and importance of communication.
What is something interesting and/or valuable about the history of organizational communication that you discovered from sources beyond the assigned reading? While reading through this chapter I had a hard time trying to find something really intriguing, so I looked for an interesting name on the references page for an interesting name. All of this lead me to Organizational trust: What it means, why it matters from the Organization Development Journal and was written by Shockley-Zalabak, Ellis and Winograd and was published in the winter of 2000.
After reading through the abstract I was hooked into a very interesting article about how trust can increase productivity. Although the article is not specifically about the history of organizational communication it does the field to other organizational fields, and even acknowledges that without communication building trust we be near impossible. By being honest with your employees the since of community can grow. This is especially important when it comes to groups and teams in an organization. Without trust a group can never bridge that gap to achieve teamness.
In order to build trust in a team it takes communication that meets all of the parts the authors are testing in the article. Trust to some degree is an underlying factor in all communication in general, but for an organization trust is money. One of the most important parts of this article was the idea of identification with a company. If an employee agrees with the values of the company and the company’s product they will be more productive making the company and themselves more productive. Working for a company that you feel like you can brag to your family and friends about is something unique and a powerful motivator.
Relating the work of Kenneth Burke, organizations, teams and communication in an article was sure to interest someone in our program, and it does reaffirm previous studies relating to the foundations of the field. Almost all research dealing with organizations are going to have direct ties to the communication field because of how interrelated they are, and the relative youth. For the field to continue to grow we must focus on the past and the ever changing face of organizations in a global market.