Boxing Is Barbaric and Should Be Banned Paper
Victory is achieved If the opponent is knocked down and unable to get up before the referee mounts to ten seconds or, if the opponent Is deemed too Injured to continue. Number of doctors are behind the banning of the sport because of the serious nature of the injuries that can be sustained during a match. The most common injuries consist of cuts and bruises, which consequently, lead to stitches and dental work being required. However, injuries sustained from the sport can be much worse; body blows that can lead to Internal bleeding and broken ribs.
Furthermore, the most serious risk comes from the possibility of either catastrophic or gradual brain damage. Brain damage comes from an injury caused by a single blow or several blows to the head. Gerald McClellan Is a living example of the serious effects boxing can have. McClellan went up In weight to challenge world Super-Middleweight champion Engel Been in London on February 25, 1995. McClellan slumped to one knee in round ten. He was counted out and collapsed in his corner. Later it was discovered he had suffered extensive brain damage.
He lost his eyesight, the ability to walk unassisted and became 80 percent deaf. In this match there were no doctors on site and he had to wait for a cubicle at the hospital. Despite this, those in favor of the sport would argue that now there are always doctors at ring side, the referee can stop the match at any time, the ropes have been redesigned and there are always rooms reserved In hospitals In case of an emergency. There Is absolutely no safe level of boxing. The risk is always there. Any blow to the body and especially the head can lead to complications or even death.
Opponents of the sport say that although medical staff can attend to various injuries and remove blood clots, prevention is the best route and that Is to ban boxing. What makes boxing deferent from other dangerous’ sports is the chronic and consistent damage inflicted on the participants as well as the intention to inflict hurt on the opponent. Arguably boxing is legalized manslaughter or murder. It is the opposition’s aim to knock the opponent out, they could throw one punch too many and cause death or serious Injury. E consider ourselves to be closed, more so than the Romans who were entertained by gladiator fights for life and death. Thousands of years on and we still go to cheer on a man punching another man until they are knocked out, Just for fame, wealth and glory. Has civilization progressed? An alternative viewpoint Is that the aim of the game Is to stop the opposing player, not to kill them, as these men are trained athletes and should be able to recover from a OK. Some societies today have taken the controversial step to outlaw this sport.
Professional Dodging NAS Eden Deanne In Norway slice 1 1 Ana In Swansea slice 1970. I support the reasons as to why boxing has been banned. What are the differences between somebody hitting another person in a ring from hitting someone on a street? The governments in these countries viewed the health concerns involved s being more important than the freedom of the individual to take part in a boxing match. If a ban on the sport can work in other countries, it can certainly work here. On the other hand, in a ring there are rules and regulations and, takes place in a safe controlled environment.
Furthermore, is boxing sending out a message to kids that it is k to hit each other? Fights in schools are taking place more and more often due to the belief that fighting can settle arguments. The big money bouts advertised on premier television channels, without censorship see boxers arguing and boasting at press conferences hat are ultimately settled by hitting each other in the ring. Having said that, it is argued that boxing can help self discipline giving those who struggle academically a way out of drug dealing and crime.
People perceive boxing to be a quick route to easy money forgetting that boxing promoters such as, Frank Warren and Don King take their cuts along with agents and trainers. It is known the world is becoming less healthy and obesity is becoming, more common. About 46% of men in England and 32% of women are overweight and an additional 17% of men and 21% of women are obese. Those in favor would say that boxing will help the current weight crisis in the world to come down, though it is the training that results in weight loss not the actual fighting.
So, why don’t people Just do the training as you do not have OK someone to get fit? The government has seen fit to ban sports like fox hunting and coco fighting, so why don’t they ban boxing? Cockfighting is a cruel blood sport that pits two roosters against each other. Spectators place bets, and the fight ends after one or both roosters die. This is similar to boxing as people place bets on who’s going to be the victor. Boxing and other sports, like wrestling, are living evidence that mankind has not rid itself of savage behavior.
Inevitably it will come to an end when humanity becomes more and more civilized. Human sacrifice and pistol duels were familiar practices in the history of human evolution. Those barbaric practices came to an end years ago and people now laugh at themselves and regret such acts. I believe this will be the fate of boxing after tens or hundreds of years. The more people become civilized and sophisticated, the more they are able to ward off both the performance and the encouragement of these so called sports.