This has either collapsed completely, or has fallen into serious disrepair.There are a number of factors here:
People don’t feel they have time or inclination to engage with a community of experts , they might already have lost trust in -unless a crisis hits, and they are forced to. This is why establishing effective lines of communication is so critical,because if people start overloading the healthcare systems only when a crisis hits, and the lines of effective communscation have not been clearly established and are already at a comfortable and efficient level, this could spell a melt down.
. Digital communication in itself offers real challenges as well. The first is obviously that many people are not yet tech savvy ( significantly the elder demographic) and it is not a simple 1.2,3 step to achieve the neccessary level of patient engagement. This is why, possibly, it has been implemented at so many different levels of complexity to encounter the many a nd diverse lifestyle and education needs.
If you don’t have time, or don’t want to learn more than the digital basics- you might just remain at the messaging stage. However, if just one platform engagement is successful, patients might perceive real value, and they might test the rest of the patient engagement waters as well. Another very interesting thing about the so- called Internet literate population is that recently they were disocved to have the attention span of a gold fish.. I would dare to add that maybe this disturbing and noteworthy find ( in terms of the upward ascent of civilizaton) isbecuae attention is focussed very much on trivial issues like cool videos, games ,shopping,a nd other activities which would encourage this kind of attention span.
This is tongue in cheek, of course; but the fact remains that Internet attention is focussed so much on the trivial , that communicating the need to use serious, useful services that take more than a few seconds to understand, and use effectively, might even be a barrier in itself.
Armed with this information, make off for the beach at sunset, alone. Take your brain along with you. Spend a few hours thinking about this your brain has this particular capacity and characteritics:
Intelligence can be defined as a general mental ability for reasoning, problem solving, and learning. Because of its general nature, intelligence integrates cognitive functions such as perception, attention, memory, language, or planning
Reasoning, problem solving, and learning are crucial facets of human intelligence. People can reason about virtually any issue, and many problems may be solved. Simple and highly complex behavioral repertoires can be learned throughout the lifespan.
Evidently thsi si due to the particular characteritics of the human brain related to its frontoparietal network
The article cites the following example:
When it comes to getting out of a tricky situation, we humans have an evolutionary edge over other primates. Take, as a dramatic example, the Apollo 13 voyage in which engineers, against all odds, improvised a chemical filter on a lunar module to prevent carbon dioxide buildup from killing the crew.
UC Berkeley scientists have found mounting brain evidence that helps explain how humans have excelled at relational reasoning, a cognitive skill in which we discern patterns and relationships to make sense of seemingly unrelated information, such as solving problems in unfamiliar circumstances.
Their findings, reported in the Dec. 3 issue of the journal Neuron, suggest that subtle shifts in the frontal and parietal lobes of the brain are linked to superior cognition. Among other things, the frontoparietal network plays a key role in analysis, memory retrieval, abstract thinking and problem-solving, and has the fluidity to adapt according to the task at hand
So , as the article itself poses the question, if we have such great reasoning powers, why are we not reasoning correc tly?